Nominal Workflow = Outline of my Talk Monitor Installation HWC Procedure Documentation Manufacturing & Test Folder Instantiation – NC Handling Getting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Uythoven, AB/BTLHCCWG, 3 May 2006 Page GeV Commissioning Machine Protection Needs to be commissioned to: Prevent damage with the used, higher.
Advertisements

Quick Start Guide | Skill Assessments Using your Online Product Interfaces and Features Getting Started - My Account Creating/Logging into your Self Test.
Slow Control LHCf Catania Meeting - July 04-06, 2009 Lorenzo Bonechi.
Handshake over DIP 10/08/20091R. Alemany - BE/OP/LHC.
YOUR LOGO HERE YOUR LOGO HERE Amy Brink Comparing caTissue Plus to caTissue 1.3.6A Amy Brink March 5 th, 2014.
Post Mortem Workshop - discussion1 17/1/2007 HWC Requirements GMPMA  Concentrate on pre-beam requirements Post-quench analysis ([semi-] automatic) Integrity.
Software Engineering For Beginners. General Information Lecturer, Patricia O’Byrne, office K115A. –
The TIMING System … …as used in the PS accelerators.
Breakdown of tests foreseen in preparation for beam Equipment folder: tests results, handling of NC, performance below specs, machine as commissioned vs.
E. Hatziangeli – LHC Beam Commissioning meeting - 17th March 2009.
Term 2, 2011 Week 3. CONTENTS The physical design of a network Network diagrams People who develop and support networks Developing a network Supporting.
Developing Workflows with SharePoint Designer David Coe Application Development Consultant Microsoft Corporation.
Web Trnsport – Beta Testing and Implementation TUG Roundtable Discussion Elizabeth Rodgers Info Tech, Inc. October 9, 2007.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October ICC Status Tanya Lim 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – ICC Status Tanya Lim RAL.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
Status Report – Injection Working Group Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities after long stops.
1 Beam Plans for Accelerator Systems: The Machine Protection System Jan Uythoven On behalf of the MPWG and the MPS Commissioning WG Special thanks to R.Schmidt,
Friday to Saturday 02:00: Machine closed. 09:00: Cryogenics all OK. Preparing pre-cycle. 10:00: Pre-cycle started. 11:30: Pre-cycle finished. 14:00: Beam.
LHC BLM Software revue June BLM Software components Handled by BI Software section –Expert GUIs  Not discussed today –Real-Time software  Topic.
FGC Upgrades in the SPS V. Kain, S. Cettour Cave, S. Page, J.C. Bau, OP/SPS April
Trigger Software Validation Olga Igonkina (U.Oregon), Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL) TAPM Open Meeting – April 12, 2007 Outline: Reminder of plans Status of infrastructure.
LHC Progress Friday 30 th October 2015 Coordination Week 44: Massimo Giovannozzi, Wolfgang Hofle, Jorg Wenninger.
RBAC Content: LHC Operational Mode Piquet Roles RBAC Strict LHC Operational mode and CMW Acknowledgements: Pierre C., Wojtek S., Stephen P., Lars J., Verena.
LIU-PSB Configuration Management EDMS Documentation, Layout and ECRs Thomas Birtwistle EN-MEF-DC.
Proposal for a Global Network for Beam Instrumentation [BIGNET] BI Group Meeting – 08/06/2012 J-J Gras CERN-BE-BI.
LHC Collimation Working Group – 02 April 2012 Results from Beam-Based Collimator Alignment G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi,
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Services and Resources Web IT Services and Resources Web Pages A Proposal Tim Bell 1.
Post Mortem Workshop Session 4 Data Providers, Volume and Type of Analysis Beam Instrumentation Stéphane Bart Pedersen January 2007.
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency LHC Beam Operation Committee, G. Valentino, R.W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, S.
1 September 2007 – Tango Meeting – A.Buteau ICALEPS 2005 Status report SOLEIL September 2007.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
BI Offline Algorithm Framework Some Examples of What It Can Do for Us.
LHC machine status ~ Daily Summary ~ Daily beam commissioning meeting Week 42 - October 13 th, 2015 CERN, Geneva, CH M. Lamont and S. Redaelli for the.
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
Commissioning / Reliability Runs / Dry runs 1 Jan Uythoven, LIBD meeting on LBDS Reliability Run 04/02/2014 Nov – Dec 2013 Commissioning individual MKDs.
CO Timing Review: The OP Requirements R. Steerenberg on behalf of AB/OP Prepared with the help of: M. Albert, R. Alemany-Fernandez, T. Eriksson, G. Metral,
The Dashboard The Working Conditions The Common Chapters State What’s Next.
Preparation for Circulating Beam - Part II Collimators (40') Oliver Aberle o Breakdown of tests foreseen in preparation for beam o Equipment folder: tests.
First Ideas – New Wire Scanner GUI - LHC V. Kain, G. Crockford, M. Kuhn Emittance Working Group 6/26/
4. Operations and Performance M. Lonza, D. Bulfone, V. Forchi’, G. Gaio, L. Pivetta, Sincrotrone Trieste, Trieste, Italy A Fast Orbit Feedback for the.
SP5 - Neuroinformatics 3DSomaMS Tutorial Computational Intelligence Group Technical University of Madrid.
E. Hatziangeli – LHC Beam Commissioning meeting - 3 rd March 2009.
MPE Workshop 14/12/2010 Post Mortem Project Status and Plans Arkadiusz Gorzawski (on behalf of the PMA team)
Brian Drendel October 31, This talk  Beams-doc private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4474https://beamdocs.fnal.gov/AD-
H2LC The Hitchhiker's guide to LSA Core Rule #1 Don’t panic.
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
LHC Beam Commissioning Meeting V. Kain & R. Alemany
A monitoring system for the beam-based feedbacks in the LHC
DRY RUNS 2015 Status and program of the Dry Runs in 2015
Saturday Coordinators weekend: Mike Lamont, Eva Barbara Holzer
Generator Services planning meeting
LHCCWG Meeting R. Alemany, M. Lamont, S. Page
Dry Run 0 Week 13: BI test of...everything circulating beam: all fixed displays and BI applications OP directories for 2009, concentrators running Need.
Wire almost entirely through beam before BLM triggers dump
Overall commissioning strategy for protons (estd. 2005)
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
LHC dry-runs (BE-BI view)
Machine Protection System Commissioning plans
LHC BLM Software audit June 2008.
Improving Collimator Setup Efficiency
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
New page for summary of test status
Wednesday :35 : Beam lost because of trip of RCBXH3.L1
Presentation transcript:

Nominal Workflow = Outline of my Talk Monitor Installation HWC Procedure Documentation Manufacturing & Test Folder Instantiation – NC Handling Getting Access during others HWC periods HWC of our monitorsUpdate MTF Ready for BeamMachine Check-Out

Machine Check Out Once HWC is ok, we can start machine check out of an instrument in order to Check its integration in the control system Check its functionality Debug it as much as we can before beam Have people involved (‘commissioners’ from OP/ABP) knowing and 'owning' the systems.

Machine Check Out We will base this activity on the summary dashboard on our Wiki Web. Test of the software public interface agreed with OP/ABP RBAC implementation will start when the configuration tools will be ready 2 dedicated test servers are in place to assess our logging needs before migration to operational servers Fixed Displays and Graphical User Interfaces Testing processes introduced in the LHC sequencer to regularly (ie before each fill) check the status of our instruments

Machine Check Out The BI SW responsible of the instrument knows best what can be tested and when. He/She will organize the continuous assessment of its instruments, ie: find/organize time slots, also outside official dry runs, where conditions allowing to test a (or several) box of the dashboard are met. Invite the instrument team members to test the box together or by sub-groups depending of the case maintain the dashboard info up to date (color scheme and details on the box dedicated page) and prepare battle field for the next iteration

Machine Check Out In addition to this, we will also participate to the LSA dry runs. This dashboard should help the organiser to know what they can use To work efficiently between these official dry run, we’ll need a sequence of events (injection, BLM/BPM/BSRT/BQ measurements, start of ramp, beam dumped,...) that LSA should play for us regularly outside dedicated dry runs.

Requested Timing Table 1/2 1. Injection beam #1 Tinj1-1000msecHX.FW-CT (561) Tinj1-10msecHX.BLMCAP-CT (578) Tinj1-1msecHX.BPMCAP1-CT (584) Tinj1-1msecHX.BCTFCAP1-CT (576) Tinj1-1msecHX.BSTRCAP1-CT (586) Tinj1Injection beam#1 (next slide) Tinj1+100msecHX.BWSFLY-CT (588) Tinj1+100msecHX.BQHT-CT (591) 2. Sleep 20secs 3. Injection beam #2 Tinj1-1000msecHX.FW-CT (561) Tinj1-10msecHX.BLMCAP-CT (578) ?? Tinj2-1msecHX.BPMCAP2-CT (585) Tinj2-1msecHX.BLMCAP-CT (578) Tinj2-1msecHX.BCTFCAP2-CT (577) Tinj2-1msecHX.BSTRCAP2-CT (587) Tinj2 Injection beam#2 (next slide) Tinj1+100msec HX.BWSFLY-CT (588) Tinj1+100msec HX.BQHT-CT (591) 4. Sleep 1 mn (feedback, orbit, logging…) 5. Energy Ramp per steps (like Etienne) every 20sec with each step HX.BLMCAP-CT (578) HX.BPMCAP1-CT (584) HX.BCTFCAP1-CT (576) HX.BSTRCAP1-CT (586) HX.BPMCAP2-CT (585) HX.BCTFCAP2-CT (577) HX.BSTRCAP2-CT (587) HX.BWSFLY-CT (588) HX.BQHT-CT (591) 6. Sleep 2 mn (feedback, orbit, logging…) 7. Beam #1 dumped HX.DUMPED1-CT (574) 8. Sleep [variable 0ms->1mn] 9. Beam #2 dumped HX.DUMPED2-CT (575) 10. Sleep 30 sec 11. Set energy to 450GeV 12. Send ‘Start Simul Table’ event (TBD) to Check Instrumentation. 13. Sleep 2mn and go back to 1

Requested Timing Table 2/2 For injection, Ioan can create LTIMs multiplexed on the next injected beam telegram group (RNGI). However this is not yet handled by LSA as RNGI is always 1 (=NO- RING). Could we have this? Etienne is currently playing following energy steps (much slower, ie 10mn per steps) [450, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, 2000, 2250, 2500, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000 GeV]. We could, if easier, scan energy from 0 to in GMT per step of 64 every 250 ms. We want to test our ‘as good as new’ routines. Can we agree on a temporary CTIM for that (also transmitted to the workstations via Ethernet) during the machine check-out period.

What’s next if we agree 1/2 Free AccessNo Access Restricted Access RF Tests – No Access for Months! Most BI individual instruments and a part of BLM and BPM should be ready for first tests around here

What’s next if we agree 2/2 LSA team has to create (and maybe extend to other equipment groups), test and run on regular bases (TBD) the proposed timing table. BI will organize a dedicated meeting per instrument before the end of March to present people and system state and plan and launch the activity