WG 2 Progress Report at TP#9 Group Name: oneM2M TP #9 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: 2014-02-17/21 Agenda Item: WG Reports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEM10-04 Initiation of a Work Item ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
Advertisements

IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IEEE Down Selection Process Date Submitted: January 18, 2005.
Release 2: Work Items best practices Group Name: TP15 Source: Scarrone Enrico, Telecom Italia Meeting Date:
Methods Of Work Ad hoc Report TP#11 Source: Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, Meeting Date:
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #17 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
OneM2M Draft proposal for slide set. This is not intended to be a oneM2M presentation. It is a collection of source material slides which can be used.
Method of Converting Resource definitions into XSD Group Name: WG3 (PRO) Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date:
30-31 March 2005 Workshop "IMS over Fixed Access" - Washington 1 TISPAN_NGN Project plan Martin Niekus Alain Sultan
TST WG Progress Report at TP 17 Group Name: TST WG Source: TST WG Chair, JaeSeung Song (KETI) Meeting Date: to , Sapporo, Japan Agenda.
Discussions for oneM2M Semantics Standardization Group Name: WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 ASN/MN-CSE.
Report of co-conveners WG1/WG2 meetings between TP1 and TP2 Group Name: Technical Plenary #2 Source: Omar Elloumi, Alcatel-Lucent,
Announcement Resources ARC Announcement_Issues Group Name: WG2 Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Input Contribution.
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
WG-2 - ARC TP #16 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #16 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
HGI activities transfer to oneM2M Group Name: MAS Source: Patricia MARTIGNE (Orange), Deutsche Telekom, Telecom Italia Meeting Date: Agenda.
Recommendations for transfer from TISPAN to 3GPP SP For information Source: Goran Engstrom: TISPAN WG1 chairman Stephen Hayes: 3GPP SA Chairman.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 05 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: ETSI.
MoW&M&P Report Group Name: TP19 Source: MoW Convenor, Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, Meeting Date:
© 2003 Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Used with the permission of the Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. under the terms as stated in this document.
Setting oneM2M’s Market direction
WG 2 Progress Report at TP #8 Group Name: oneM2M TP #8 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /13 Agenda Item: WG Reports.
WG1 status report to TP#17 Group Name: oneM2M TP17 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#17, Item 10.3,
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #9 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #10 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: WG5 Chairs Meeting Date: to
WG 3 Progress Report at TP #7 Group Name: oneM2M TP #7 Source: Raymond Forbes, LM Ericsson, Meeting Date: /18 Agenda.
Status Report on Access TP8 Group Name: WG2 Decision  Meeting Date: Discussion  Source: OBERTHUR Technologies Information  Contact:
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#17 closing Group Name: WPM (TP adhoc) Source: convener WPM Roland Hechwartner, Meeting Date:
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Steve Barclay, ATIS] [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M-Cons#4, 28 Mar 2012.
TP WG1 status report to TP#16 Group Name: oneM2M TP16 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#16,
TSG-S Project Coordination Recommendations Nick Yamasaki TSG-S Chair ABSTRACT: This document presents TSG-S recommendations for improved coordination of.
TST WG Progress Report at TP 19 Group Name: TP Source: TST WG Chair, JaeSeung Song (KETI) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP19, Item.
SEC Conference calls following TP#11 Group Name: WG4 (SEC ) Decision  Meeting Date: Discussion  Source: OBERTHUR Technologies Information.
MoW&M&P Report Group Name: TP18 Source: MoW Convenor, Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, Meeting Date:
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
Project management and communication structure Nataša Urbančíková Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
ARC ordinary F2F meeting Seoul, June 2013 WG2 MEETING NOTES.
WG-2 - ARC TP #18 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #18 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
Release Timeline Discussion R2 and beyond Group Name: TP_WPM Source: Roland Hechwartner, WPM Convenor, Meeting Date:
Release Timeline Discussion R2 and beyond Group Name: TP_WPM Source: Roland Hechwartner, WPM Convenor, Meeting Date:
OneM2M Partnership Project. Contents Introduction Founding Partners Participation Scope & Objectives Structure Deliverables Contacts © 2013 oneM2M Partners.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 14 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: [ETSI]
Recent Results of JCA-NID and TSAG Byoung Nam LEE HyoungJun KIM ETRI, Korea.
Doc.: IEEE /0281r1 Submission James D. Allen (Appairent Technologies, Inc.) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
TST WG Progress Report at TP #20 Group Name: TP Source: TST WG Chair, JaeSeung Song (KETI) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP20, Item.
WG5 – MAS#19 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
SEC #11 WG4 Status & Release 1 Outlook Group Name: Source:,, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
WG1 status report to TP#21 Group Name: oneM2M TP21 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#21, Item 10.4,
WG5 – MAS#21 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
WG 3 Progress Report at TP10 Group Name: oneM2M TP10 Source: Raymond Forbes, LM Ericsson, Meeting Date: to
WG2 - ARC TP #20 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #20 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #8 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
MoW Report Group Name: TP21 Source: MoW Convenor, Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, Meeting Date:
WG1 status report to TP#20 Group Name: oneM2M TP20 Source: Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#19, Item 10.4, Reports.
Authorization Architecture Discussion Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 28 MAY, 2014 Agenda.
Technical Plenary Terms for the collaboration with P2413 From: oneM2M TP Chair Source: Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
WG5 – MAS#22 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Tim Carey(Alcatel-Lucent, WG5 Vice Chair) Meeting Date:
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#20 Group Name: WPM (TP adhoc) Source: convener WPM Roland Hechwartner, Meeting Date:
Reasons for CSF Clean-up (Issues & Next Steps) Group Name: WG2 Source: Syed Husain – NTT DOCOMO Meeting Date: (ARC_9.3) Agenda Item: 6 DOC#:
WG1 - REQ Progress Report at TP #11 Group Name: WG1 REQ (Requirements) Source: WG1 Vice Chairs Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#11,
Proposed Process for Forming the oneM2M Baseline  Group name: TP#1  Source: Laurent Laporte, Sprint,
20 September 2004 C R4 0 Proposed Process for TSG-C Work Items Source Alberto Gutierrez Motorola
WG5 – MAS#23 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
3GPP interworking in R3 Group Name: ARC
WG1 status report to TP#15 Group Name: oneM2M TP15
Release Timeline Discussion R2 and beyond
DSC Change Governance Review Group
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#25
WG5 – MAS#27 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Presentation transcript:

WG 2 Progress Report at TP#9 Group Name: oneM2M TP #9 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /21 Agenda Item: WG Reports

Issues for DECISION in TP Endorse R. Brennan as co-rapporteur of TS-0001 (replacing G. Foti) © 2013 oneM2M Partners 2

Issues for DISCUSSION in TP WG2 leadership would like to encourage those who contributed to WG2 features to ensure those are addressed in WG3 for stage 3 aspects © 2013 oneM2M Partners 3

Items for INFORMATION © 2013 oneM2M Partners 4

Highlights WI-0002 TS-0001 Architecture – Enforced priorities Not all contributions were handled -> conference calls – Agreed way forward for essential (sometimes controversial) subjects needed to declare a freeze Triggering Charging Security Access Right/Role/Subscription – Discussed how to handle features that will not be part of R1 (features to be moved to R2) – Continuous coordination with other WGs WG4: Provided the basis for SEC section in TS0001 -> THANKS WI-0011 TS 0007 (Services) – Agreed skeleton – Initial discussion on architecture – Initial input on architecture © 2013 oneM2M Partners 5

Highlights Agreement in principle to freeze TS-0001 one week after availability of the output draft. Extract from method of work – Deliverable Freeze:A Technical Plenary (TP) and/or Working Group (WG) action on a draft deliverable, restricting further technical input to essential changes and corrections – From 7.2 Deliverable management – Step 4: Freeze a)The Working Group (and/or Technical Plenary) may determine that the technical content of a draft deliverable is complete (given consideration of the WI scope and workplan), and may freeze the deliverable for technical input. b)A deliverable freeze shall restrict further technical input to essential changes and corrections. © 2013 oneM2M Partners 6

Highlights Agreement in principle to put TS-0001 under Change Control mode Extract from method of work – The Working Group (and/or Technical Plenary) may determine that the content of a draft deliverable is sufficiently advanced that it will utilize the Change Control process. a.1) New Technical Specification (TS), Technical Report (TR) or other deliverable types may be placed under Change Control at the discretion of the group a.2) New Technical Specification (TS) deliverables shall be placed under Change Control no later than the Freeze date. a.3) Approved Technical Specification (TS) and Technical Report (TR) deliverables shall always be under Change Control

Guidelines for change control Includes an informative introduction containing the problem(s) being solved, and a summary list of proposals. The second part containing proposals: Follows the principle of completeness, where all related changes within a deliverable are simultaneously proposed to be made E.g. A change impacting 5 tables should not only include a proposal to change only 3 tables. Includes any changes to references, definitions, and acronyms in the same deliverable. Follows the drafting rules Has content that does not conflict with the content of an already approved text, by modification, deletion or the addition of an editor’s note. Has been spell-checked and is grammatically correct, to the extent practicable Change bars for modifications shall be used. The change should include the current and surrounding clauses to clearly show where a change is located and to provide technical context of the proposed change. Additions of complete sections need not show surrounding clauses as long as the proposed section number clearly shows where the new section is proposed to be located. Each CR should contain changes related to only one particular issue/problem. Multiple changes in a single CR shall be clearly separated by horizontal lines with embedded text such as, start of change 1, end of change 1, start of new clause, end of new clause. When subsequent changes are made to content of a CR, then the accepted version should not show changes over changes. The accepted version of the CR should only show changes relative to the baseline approved text.

Next Steps Need to provide guidelines for next steps – What is considered essential change/correction – Guidelines will be available within one weel Decisions will be made on a case by case basis © 2013 oneM2M Partners 9

Next Meetings / Calls © 2013 oneM2M Partners 10