1. WG 3 Progress Report at TP #7 Group Name: oneM2M TP #7 Source: Raymond Forbes, LM Ericsson, raymond.forbes@ericsson.com Meeting Date: 2013-10-14/18 Agenda Item: WG Reports

2. Issues for DECISION in TP None identified © 2013 oneM2M Partners 2

3. Issues for DISCUSSION in TP None identified © 2013 oneM2M Partners 3

4. Items for INFORMATION © 2013 oneM2M Partners 4

5. Highlights Progressed Work-Items – WI-0008 TR-0009v0.2.3 Protocol Analysis (to be available) – WI-0009 TS-0004v0.1.1 Protocols (on the portal) Decision in WG to reschedule approvals – WI-0008 TR-0009 until TP#10 TP-2013-0349 – WI-0009 TS-0004 until TP#12 see TP-2013-0350 Need to work on Management protocols with WG5 – Discussion on a WG5 Work-Item (possibility for shared responsibility & shared text in the Technical Specification) – Feasible in October TP.8 for shared room with WG-2 to avoid overlap. © 2013 oneM2M Partners 5

6. Open Issues Document oneM2M-PRO-2013-0065R03-Protocol_Segments – What are the differences between PS1 and PS2, why not the same protocols? – Why can we not allow all protocols on any interface? – No prohibitions or restrictions at that stage of development – why should we develop any at this point? – PS5, PS4, PS6 – what’s the difference according to what had been defined so far? – Picking up one protocol now is dangerous as each one has its characteristics. – The concept of protocol statements is very useful. Some reference points are not covered. Need a protocol segment for Mcn. – There are more reference points to be covered as in the diagram. – In most cases PS1 goes over larger network and PS2 goes over local area network – could justify different protocols. – More protocols should be considered. – No difference seen between PS 3 and PS5. – PS1 and PS2 are to be sorted at first, the others can come further. Most likely to support more than one option. – Choosing from the list of candidatures seems still premature before solidifying a portion of Architecture. © 2013 oneM2M Partners 6

7. Open Action Items None identified © 2013 oneM2M Partners 7

8. Next Steps Request contributions to complete analysis in the TR – Verticals utilization of protocols E.g. Energy, Residential – Protocol analysis E.g. Zigbee, IEEE 802.15.4 Request contributions for preliminary work on TS – Attribute data types, segment protocols, etc. Progress TR and TS though conference calls © 2013 oneM2M Partners 8

9. Next Meetings / Calls Proposed Interim meetings between TP#7 and TP#8 (December 09) – PRO#7.1 Wednesday – 1:00 pm UTC, October 30 (NA daylight time - EU standard time) – PRO#7.2 Wednesday – 1:00 pm UTC, November 06 (World on standard time) – PRO#7.3 Wednesday – 1:00 pm UTC, November 13 (World on standard time) – PRO#7.4 Wednesday – 1:00 pm UTC, November 20 (World on standard time) – PRO#7.5 Wednesday – 1:00 pm UTC, November 27 (World on standard time) WG-3 sessions are expected in Stream 1 with WG-2 at TP#8 (09-14-December 2013) © 2013 oneM2M Partners 9