Student Background Questionnaire National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, 16 - 19 October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disability. Goals and Indicators Methodological issues Needs proper adaptation to the conditions and language of country The indicator provides a screening.
Advertisements

Birth Registration and Early Learning
Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation ELLCO
Translation and Translation Verification National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
Translation and Verification of ICCS instruments Summary of the Field Trial & Plans for the Main Study National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor,
Children’s subjective well-being Findings from national surveys in England International Society for Child Indicators Conference, 27 th July 2011.
2.F Developing a Contextual Assessment for OOS 15 year olds.
Overview of Main Survey Data Analysis and Scaling National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Measuring socio-economic background and its influence on school education outcomes South Australian Institute for Education Research Spring Seminar Series.
Deborah Cobb-Clark (U Melbourne) Mathias Sinning (ANU) Steven Stillman (U Otago)
Infant AND TODDLER SENSORY PROFILE
Parental Acculturation and Influences on Education of Elementary Latino Students: A Parent Perspective. Laura Castro California State University, Long.
Overview of field trial analysis procedures National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Research Ethics Levels of Measurement. Ethical Issues Include: Anonymity – researcher does not know who participated or is not able to match the response.
Proposed Cognitive Test for the Main Study National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
1 Writing the Research Proposal Researchers communicate: Plans, Methods, Thoughts, and Objectives for others to read discuss, and act upon.
Needs Analysis Instructor: Dr. Mavis Shang
ICCS European Regional Report National Coordinators Meeting Madrid February 2010.
Outline of International Report on ICCS National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Targeting Research: Segmentation Birds of a feather flock together, i.e. people with similar characteristics tend to exhibit similar behaviors Characteristics.
Building a database for children with disabilities using administrative data and surveys Adele D. Furrie September 29, 2011.
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Contextual questionnaires 10 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
Economic Analysis and Statistics Division, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Beirut, 7-10 June 2005 Martin Schaaper OECD METHODOLOGIES AND.
National Adaptation Forms International Study Centre Data Management Seminar Hamburg, July 2008.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 ICCS 2009 Field Operations.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 ICCS Sampling Design.
Validation of the Assessment and Comparability to the PISA Framework Hao Ren and Joanna Tomkowicz McGraw-Hill Education CTB.
ICCS status report Wolfram Schulz International Study Centre Data Management Seminar Hamburg, July 2007.
Overview of ICCS field trial National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Affective-Behavioural Domains and Contextual Framework National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October
3rd NRC Meeting, 9-12 June 2008, Windsor 1 Data Management Procedures Michael Jung, IEA Data Processing and Research Center.
IEA INTERNATIONAL CIVIC AND CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION STUDY (ICCS) A new comparative study of civic and citizenship education AERA Annual Meeting New York,
Research Designs & Methods  Research design: the strategy and overall framework of the research. Example: A survey design.  Research method: how the.
National adaptations to main survey instruments and layout verification National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Explaining variation in CCE outcomes (Chapters 7 & 8) National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Quality Assurance Program National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
The reporting of student questionnaire data (Chapters 4&5) National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
The Contextual Questionnaires for the PISA for Development Study Options.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 Data Management Procedures Preview of software used in ICCS Michael Jung, IEA Data Processing Center.
ICCS Main Survey Overview National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
Proposed student questionnaire for the main survey National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Study Overview National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October
Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg WinW3S – Listing Students and Assigning Booklets.
Eurostat DSS November 2013 Strategic issues related to the modernisation of European social statistics Standardisation of variables.
ICCS Marker Training Hamburg July 2008 Final note on marking Reliability marking report from WinDEM will include record of scores for double-marked items,
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshop Out-of-School 15 year old 1 st and 2 nd October 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
Teacher Survey Design National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 1 ICCS 2009 Data Files and Variables.
The European Indicator of Language Competence Presentation Policy Forum, Council of Europe, 7 February 2007.
24-25 September 2009Meeting of the European Directors of Social Statistics Update on Lifelong Learning and Education Systems statistics Agenda point 4.8.
15-May-09 Core variables in social surveys Citizenship and Country of birth Eurostat F-1: Population Anne Herm.
15 May 2009 WG Core variables in social surveys 1 Point Educational attainment.
Teacher Questionnaire National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Undergraduate School of Criminal Justice
How to analyze your data Deciding which approach to use Analysing qualitative data Analysing quantitative data Measuring data.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
ACER Research Conference 2008 Brisbane, August
Method.
Education and Training Statistics Working Group Meeting 5/6 June 2012 Item 4.1 Revised legal framework for CVT statistics Sylvain Jouhette 5/6 June.
Item 10 – Conclusions of the meeting
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2015
Meeting of the Directors of Social Statistics October 2016
PISA for Development Technical Workshops Contextual questionnaires
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Item 4.3 – Repeal of CVTS legal acts
Social Practice of the language: Describe and share information
Education and Training Statistics Working Group, May 2011
Meeting of the Directors of Social Statistics Board June 2016
STEPS Site Report.
Meeting of the Directors of Social Statistics February 2016
Presentation transcript:

Student Background Questionnaire National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Characteristics of the Student background questionnaire (StBQ) Will collect contextual data at the student level Will be administered after the international test (before StPQ) Will take about 15 minutes to complete May have similar questions as in TQ and ScQ

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Mapping StBQ contents to the Contextual Framework

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Proposed student background questions All of these draft questions are in a preliminary stage In particular questions on participation and communication may need further discussion and refinement Some questions will require national adaptations, which should be reviewed and documented (e.g. ISCED categories for parental education)

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Changes from CIVED Inclusion of questions on participation, communication and teaching (as factual student reports) Categories for parental and expected education with reference to international framework (ISCED) Re-writing of problematic CIVED items Addition of items (e.g. country of birth for parents)

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Priorities were assigned to the preliminary set of questions * Low Priority **Medium Priority ***High Priority Priorities are subject to further discussion!

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Student characteristics Age*** Gender*** Optional: Ethnic background (“What best describes you?”)**

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Home characteristics Household composition** Number of people at home* Country of birth (student, father and mother)*** Year of coming to * Language use at home***

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Socio-economic indicators Parental occupation (mother, father) – two questions each*** Parental education (simplified)*** Household possessions** Books at home*** Daily newspaper at home*

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Student activities Frequency of involvement*** –Discussions –Media use –Social activities Active civic-related participation out of school*** Frequency of active civic-related participation*** Civic-related activities at school***

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 School-related issues Classroom practices (climate for open classroom discussion)*** –Frequency scale instead of agreement scale! Expected education*** –ISCED levels instead of years of education (to increase precision)

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Issues Development of cross-nationally valid measures of active participation Feasibility of capturing data on parental occupation (validity, reliability of coding procedures) Trends from CIVED: Should some variables be kept unchanged for trend reporting? Use of “Don’t Know” categories (parental education, others?)

NRC Meeting Amsterdam Oct 2006 Questions or comments?