Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADVISING STUDENTS: WHAT DO THEY REALLY WANT? Marymount Innovations October 2009.
Advertisements

2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Student Satisfaction Inventory Results Saint Joseph’s College March 12, 2013.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
CIC Key Indicators for Hollins University Jamie Redwine Office of Institutional Research June 2005.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA Measuring Student Perspectives on University Experiences.
The Evergreen State College Game show Your hosts: The folks from Institutional Research and Assessment.
Student Engagement at the Research University (SERU) at UW: Student Life Student Life Assessment Meeting 02 October 2014 Debbie McGhee.
UTK Quiz. The University of Tennessee was founded in:
SATISFACTION AND SELF-PERCEPTIONS: HOW ARE THE RELATED? STEVE GRAUNKE INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS.
The Results of The Current Curriculum Student Survey Spring 2002 Department of Planning and Research.
Registration Satisfaction Survey FAS Report, Fall Presented by: K. El Hassan, PhD. Director, OIRA.
Fall 2008 Graduate Survey Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Personal and Professional Development FLEX – Spring 2015 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Climate for Minorities at UK A Summary of Various Survey Findings (1997 – 2001)
Global Health Minor Cornell’s Global Health Minor Begun in 2006 with cofunding from the US National Institutes of Health and Cornell University Complements.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Selected Results of President’s Office Survey of Alumni Graduating in 1997/98 The Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies July 15, 2003 Jennifer.
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Comparative Alumni Research 2011 Update Overall Comparison: Lutheran Colleges to Flagship Public Universities Lutheran Educational Conference of North.
Comparing Senior And Sophomore Knowledge and Confidence Concerning Academic Advising Anecdotal evidence suggested that a discrepancy existed between what.
Campus Climate: Embedded in Strategic Plan Core Theme Three: Building Community – Create a diverse, inclusive, and safe environment accessible to all Objective.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
An Institutional Look at Students’ Satisfaction with NWTC Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Career Project – Part II.  How many students attend?  How diverse is the campus?  How many students choose to attend graduate or professional school?
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
Undergraduate&Graduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2016
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Institutional Research and Planning
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2017
2003 Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
One Step Away Initiative
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Report to the Board of Trustees November 2018
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2018
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Institutional Research and Planning
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
Institutional Research and Planning
Presentation transcript:

Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning

Undergraduate student sample 19 % response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate students

Undergraduate student satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction [percentage] Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate student satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction [means] Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Histogram of Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction

Undergraduate student satisfaction Overall Satisfaction Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate satisfaction with NJIT Five year comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate student satisfaction Academics ** Increases over the previous year are highlighted.

Undergraduate student satisfaction Campus Life ** Increases over the previous year are highlighted.

Undergraduate student satisfaction Computers ** Increases over the previous year are highlighted.

Undergraduate student satisfaction Public Safety/Buildings & Grounds ** Increases over the previous year are highlighted.

Undergraduate student satisfaction On-campus Food Services

Undergraduate student satisfaction Student Services ** Increases over the previous year are highlighted.

Five year comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate importance vs. satisfaction High importance, high satisfaction  Personal security and safety on campus  Quality of own academic program  Relevance of coursework to career development  Overall quality of instruction High importance, low satisfaction  Overall quality of food service  Quality of campus life

Undergraduate correlates of satisfaction

Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Student satisfaction By Undergraduate/Graduate Undergraduate Response Rate: 19% Graduate Response Rate: 24%

Graduate student sample (N=566) 24% response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Graduate students

Graduate student satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction [percentage] Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance

Graduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction [means] Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance

Graduate student satisfaction Comparison with 2006 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance

Histogram of Overall Graduate Satisfaction

Overall Graduate satisfaction with NJIT Four year comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate student satisfaction Comparison of 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall graduate satisfaction by school Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate student satisfaction By citizenship Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate student satisfaction By enrollment status Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate importance vs. satisfaction High importance, high satisfaction  Personal security and safety on campus  Quality of own academic program  Relevance of coursework to career development  Support for computer hardware and software High importance, low satisfaction  Overall satisfaction with financial aid services  Opportunities to work on research projects with faculty

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction By School

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school SOA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall undergraduate satisfaction by school SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction By School

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction by school CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction by school CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction by school NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction by school SOA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall graduate satisfaction by school SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied