ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2010 Shao-Fu ShihSteve AndersonMike Goldfarb Josh Smith.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
ECE 477 Design Review Team 22  Txt Msg DJ Garrett Strzelecki Kyle Brown John Doherty Chris McCabe K.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 15  Spring 2013 Jackson McCormick, Andrew Batek, Carey Woolet, Justin Lindley.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2012 Brennan Tran Jonah Ea Ben Pluckebaum Kevin Meyer.
Twitch Plays ECE477 ECE 477 Design Review Team 1 − Spring 2015 Hannan Harlan Root Tornquist.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Srichand Varun Madhu Anvesh.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Stuart Pulliam Will Granger Linda.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Spring 2005 Omar Shaikh - Nathan Smith - Jeff Huston - Ryan Koors.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 1  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Nathan Irvin Will Bouchonnet Allen.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 6  Spring 2011 Left to right: Kirk Iler, Brian Bentz, Stephen Wolf, Fuhe Xu.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8  Spring 2008 Mike Cianciarulo, Josh Wildey, Robert Toepfer, Trent Nelson.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 19  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Calvin Mwesigwa John Marston Noah.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Spring 2005 Paul Dulle Pat McLaughlin Randy Scheifele Chad Bjorklund David Meyer.
Xin Jin Zelun Tie Ranmin Chen Hang Xie. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2010 Digi-Brush Josh LongCaleb Ayew-ewKatie Schremser.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 14  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2007 Wes Chris Josh Dave.
 Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design  Schematic and theory of operation.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 2  FALL 2011 Members: Bo Yuan, Yimin Xiao, Yang Yang, Jintao Zhang.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 7  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE Grande ECE 477 Design Review Team 3 - Fall 2008.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 01  Fall 2010 Jigar Gandhi Chandler Wall John-Taylor Smith Eric Zarowny.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 2  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 11  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2009 Ben Carter – Jacqui Dickerson – Ian Oliver – Dennis Lee.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2006 Prashant Grimella Andy Brezinsky Tim Sendgikoski Clark Malmgren.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Fall 2006 Daryl Dave Will Ben.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Fall 2006 Sumanth Peddamatham Alex Tucker Chris Arges Radhika Mulani.
ECE 477 D ESIGN R EVIEW T EAM 5 MY ATM F ALL 2012 Tung Lun Loo Yu Chen Lim Chuan Yean Tan Xue Yuan Wong.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 02  Fall Outline Project overview - KProject overview - K Project-specific success criteria -KProject-specific success.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Fall 2007 Steven Kingsley (Analog) Roy Scheck (Leader) Tony Liechty (Digital) Charles Lan (Software)
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 18  Spring 2013 Derek Pesyna, Tim Brown, Evan Foote, Doug Wile.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2007 JUSTIN AZAD AFIFF NUHAIRIADAM.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 8(SLOW)  Spring 2006.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 7  Spring 2008 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 12  Spring 2006 EricDaniel Atandra Sriharsha Aasenda Silva Burman Vengapaty.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.
Colin Graber Jason Kohl Jacob Varnau Cameron Young ECE 477 Design Review Team 2 - Spring 2015 R.I.S.K.
Eric Tarun Craig Dave ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Spring 2006 Galamback Chawla Noble Kristof.
1 © 2008 RoboRubik ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 11 – Spring 2008 Tyler Heck Dave Bukiet Erik Carron Casey Kloiber.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2010 Mike Wei Jon SchwarzCarlo Mesina Bill Bergquist.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 9  Fall 2005 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich.
Treasure Chess ECE 477 Team 2 - Spring 2013 Parul Schroff, Brock Caley, Sidharth Malik, Jeremy Stork Design Review.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
ECE 477 Design Review Team BOAR  Fall 2011 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Left to Right:
ECE 477 Design Review Team 1  Spring 2009 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2008 Varun Srichand Anvesh Madhu.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 3  Spring 2005 “VoIP Connect” Ankur TrushalAshish Dushyant.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 21 - Spring 2013
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 4  Spring 2006
ECE 477 Design Review Team 5  Fall 2006
ECE 477 Design Review Team ??  Fall 2012
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe

Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria Block diagramBlock diagram Component selection rationaleComponent selection rationale Packaging designPackaging design Schematic and theory of operationSchematic and theory of operation PCB layoutPCB layout Software design/development statusSoftware design/development status Project completion timelineProject completion timeline Questions / discussionQuestions / discussion

Project Overview The Digital Real-time Intelligent Networked Kegerator will address safety, legal, usability, and economic concerns of draft beverage distribution. Alcohol consumption monitoring will provide a tool to allow a person to know exactly how much they have consumed, learn estimated legal limits, and reduce unauthorized or unlawful drinking. System control and monitoring will allow users to track inventory, decrease beverage waste, and predict future resource needs.The Digital Real-time Intelligent Networked Kegerator will address safety, legal, usability, and economic concerns of draft beverage distribution. Alcohol consumption monitoring will provide a tool to allow a person to know exactly how much they have consumed, learn estimated legal limits, and reduce unauthorized or unlawful drinking. System control and monitoring will allow users to track inventory, decrease beverage waste, and predict future resource needs.

Project-Specific Success Criteria An ability to sense and control beverage temperature.An ability to sense and control beverage temperature. An ability to identify authorized users via electronic identification.An ability to identify authorized users via electronic identification. An ability to track consumption on an individual basis.An ability to track consumption on an individual basis. An ability to display user/device status on an LCD.An ability to display user/device status on an LCD. An ability to control the function of and report the status of the kegerator via an embedded web server.An ability to control the function of and report the status of the kegerator via an embedded web server.

Block Diagram

Microprocessor Selection

LCD Selection

RFID Reader Selection

Packaging Design Self contained unitSelf contained unit Easy to add on to existing systemEasy to add on to existing system

Schematic/Theory of Operation

PCB Layout 236 mm 117 mm

Bottom Copper Analog Gnd / Power Gnd 50 mil i Digital Gnd Pins 2 and 3 Internally Connected Single Point of Analog and Digital Ground

Top Copper 12V 50 mil12V 60 mil 5V Traces 50 mil 3.3V

PCB Layout Common Beverage Interface Temp/ Compress RCM3315 Microcontroller Module 5V and 3.3V Converters Serial Interface Biometric Future Dev

Common Beverage Interface Have common I/0 simplified easily through symmetry Segregates High Current Analog From Rest of Circuit

DC to DC Converter Traces made short and large as possible Bypass Capacitors mounted underneath to get as close as possible Power and Signal Gnds Segregated EMI reduction

Software Design/Development Status All functions built into costate statements.All functions built into costate statements. –Temperature polling –Rabbit web External events triggered by interupts.External events triggered by interupts. –Flowmeters: code working on rabbit Other hardware over serial communication.Other hardware over serial communication. –Bill Validator: code working on rabbit –RFID: code working on rabbit –LCD: code working on computer

Project Completion Timeline Week 8 – PCB and Schematic finalization and test circuitsWeek 8 – PCB and Schematic finalization and test circuits Week 9 – Finalize PCB and test circuitsWeek 9 – Finalize PCB and test circuits Week 10 – Complete all functional software modules and hardware testingWeek 10 – Complete all functional software modules and hardware testing Week 11 – PCB integration and testingWeek 11 – PCB integration and testing Week 12 – Integrate controller functions with web and hardware testingWeek 12 – Integrate controller functions with web and hardware testing Week 13 – Add complex featuresWeek 13 – Add complex features Week 14 – Test complex features, create video and posterWeek 14 – Test complex features, create video and poster Week 15 – Final Presentation, ReportWeek 15 – Final Presentation, Report

Questions / Discussion