Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator December 8, 2014 12:30.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Tuesday, November 1, :00-3:30 p.m.
Advertisements

Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Webinars May 23 rd and 30 th, 2014.
Anticipated Grant Opportunities to Support Additional Time for Learning Grant Information Webinar March 14, :00 AM – 11:00 AM 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM.
Update and 2009 Grant Process. What is ITQ? Part of Federal No Child Left Behind $$ focused on increasing the number of “highly qualified” teachers in.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
1 Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Title IIB Webinar Tuesday April 6, :00-4:30 p.m.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Title II, Part B Competitive Grant Program No Child Left.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Friday, January 10, :00-3:30 p.m.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Title II, Part B Mathematics and Science Partnerships Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
11 Mathematics and Science Partnership Grants Title II, Part B No Child Left Behind.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
New York State Staff/Curriculum Development Network S/CDN September 22, 2005.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Session (ESE, Malden) June 6, 2014.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Spring 2013 OMSP Request For Proposal. The purpose of this PowerPoint is to highlight critical components of the Request for Proposals that have historically.
Improving Instruction through Regional Data Initiatives FY2010 ARRA Title II, Part D Competitive Grant Program Applications due September 15, 2009.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
Service-Learning and Ecosystems!
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
MSP RFP 2012 Info Session Nov. 1, 2011
New Jersey Department of Education
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP)
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator December 8, :30 – 1:00 p.m.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2 POLL What type of organization do you represent?  District/LEA  Higher Education – STEM Department  Higher Education – Education Department  Charter School or Private School  Other

Agenda  Overview of the Federal Program  Overview of the Massachusetts Program  The Request for Proposals RFP  Developing a Proposal  Evaluation  Budget

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 4 Federal Program Title IIB of No Child Left Behind  U.S. Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Priorities  Encourage collaboration between institutes of higher education and school districts  Provide high-quality professional development to increase teacher subject matter knowledge and standards-based instructional practices  Improve student academic achievement in mathematics and/or science  Investigate institutional change in partner organizations

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5 Massachusetts Title IIB Program  Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MMSP)  Three year duration - dependent upon continued funding  In-service training to teachers provides at least:  Minimum of 45 hours of direct instruction  Minimum of 24 hours of supplemental support to support implementation in the classroom

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 6 MMSP Title IIB Program Goals  GOAL I: Develop and implement an effective and sustained course of study for in-service educators of STEM by integrating the courses of study into schools of arts and sciences and/or education at institutions of higher education.  GOAL II: Identify credible, instructionally useful measures of student growth and select, develop, and pilot District Determined Measures (DDMs) that measure student growth relative to subject matter standards.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 7 MMSP Title IIB Program Goals (continued)  GOAL III: Increase the number of STEM educators in the partner school districts who participate in effective professional development and advance their knowledge of subject matter standards, disciplinary practices and student learning.  GOAL IV: Develop and implement a systemic approach to STEM education by integrating professional development with district and school STEM improvement initiatives.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 8 History  Cohort 1: February 2004, 8 partnerships  Cohort 2: September 2004, 2 partnerships  Cohort 3: September 2006, 9 partnerships  Cohort 4: September 2008, 8 partnerships  Cohort 5: September 2010, 2 partnerships  Cohort 6: February 2012, 5 partnerships  Cohort 7: April 2014, 6 partnerships  Cohort 8: December 2014, 1 partnerships  This RFP will continue Cohort 8

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 9 MMSP Title IIB Cohort 8  Develop and deliver rigorous Professional Development (PD) for middle school STEM educators.  Develop DDMs to measure student growth and inform educator development resulting from the PD.  Integrate PD into the Districts/LEA STEM initiatives and course offerings of Institutes of Higher Education.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 10 RFP: Request for Proposals  Contains information about the program, purpose, eligibility, general requirements, funding, and submission  Contains links to:  Workbook  Additional Information:  Required Program Information  High-Need District List,  Definition of Terms,  Technical Guide B: Measuring Student Growth,  Massachusetts Standard for Professional Development,  Links to Rubric, Frameworks, Key Practices, etc.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 11 Eligibility  Include at least one high-need district (LEA) and a STEM department from an institution of higher education (IHE);  Develop middle school STEM DDMs and Professional Development;  Address the Required Program Information;  Develop proposal collaboratively by the partners;

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 12 General Requirements  High-quality, content-specific middle school STEM professional development (PD) in accordance with the Massachusetts Standards for Professional Development;  Selection, development, and implementation of District- Determined Measures of student learning growth related to this PD  At least 50% of the participating teachers are from high- need districts  Integration of the state evaluator into planning and compliance with state and federal reporting requirements;  Regular collaborative meetings of partners  A web page to communicate and disseminate partnership information.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 13 PD Design: Courses Meet Massachusetts Standard for Professional Development  Standards-focused courses  Rigorous & graduate level  Minimum of 45 hours of direct instructional time  Responsive to identified district needs

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 14 PD Design: Follow-up Activities  minimum of 24 hours per course;  guide the implementation of PD course(s) into standards-based instruction;  facilitate connections between PD course(s) and DDMs;  facilitate the development and analysis of DDMs;  encourage active engagement of district or school instructional leaders;  promote connections to district STEM initiatives;

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 15 Funding  $1,000,000 for  Approximately 4-5 MMSP projects  Up to $200,000 per year, for up to 3 years Years 2 and 3 contingent on performance and available federal funding

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 16 DEVELOPING A PROPOSAL

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 17 Form a Partnership  High Need School District  Institution Higher Education  Science, Math, Engineering Department  Other LEAs (Private Schools, Charter Schools or Consortiums)  Businesses  Nonprofit & For-profit Organizations

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 18 Assess Needs Middle School STEM  DDMs  Areas to develop or improve  Student Achievement  DDMs, MCAS, and/or benchmark assessments  Teacher  Licensure  Individual Professional Development Plans  District/School  STEM Initiatives  Instructional Leadership

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 19 DDMs  Measures of student learning, growth, and achievement related to the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks.  Comparable across the district for all educators in a grade or subject.  Selecting DDMs gives districts a long-sought opportunity to broaden the range of what and how knowledge and skills are assess.  The results of which will lead to improved educator practice and student learning.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 20 Develop Activities  Meet the needs of the district(s)  Align with the goals of the partnership  Describe the methods to identify and enroll teachers in sufficient numbers in courses that address their professional growth needs and DDMs development  Standard-specific course or course of study  Course syllabus and sample session  Align with MA Frameworks – revised STEM standards  Consider sustainability  Integration of educator’s experiences into initiatives at the school/district level  Integration of courses or course components into the higher education institution’s on-going program, department or regional offerings

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 21 EVALUATION Logic Model Participant feedback Participant info database PD and Support Activities Teacher Knowledge and Skills Better Classroom Instruction Improved Student Achievement Standard logic model for professional development programs Required tools/measures Pre/post test of content knowledge Self-report surveys and/or classroom observation DDMs MCAS scores

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 22 Evaluation One State-Wide Evaluator  Role: Objective collaborator  Skilled in systematically gathering, analyzing, and presenting data  Proficient using analytic tools/software  High level of comfort using online reporting tools

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 23 Evaluation Program-Level Evaluator will:  Coordinate partnership data collection and analysis  Evaluate impact and design of the program  Provide technical assistance to partnerships  Serve as liaison with USED for evaluation issues

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 24 Evaluation Course-Level Evaluator will:  Analyze and summarize course and impact data  Changes in teacher knowledge and teacher practice  Changes in student Achievement  Progress toward integrating PD with STEM improvement initiatives (for high need districts)

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 25 Evaluation Course-Level Partnerships will:  Design PD courses to Meet Massachusetts Standard for Professional Development  Formative Evaluation  Summative Evaluation  Tools  Develop, administer, and analyze DDMs  Maintain Participant Tracking System

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 26 Design Your Budget All budgets and budget descriptions must be:  Aligned with the program activities and reflect any coordinated uses of resources from other sources  Cost-effective: cost per teacher participant should be approximately $2,000 per course  10% should be allocated for the state evaluator to support local and program evaluation and technical assistance activities

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 27 DESIGN YOUR BUDGET  Funds may be used for  Administrative costs  Stipends  Substitutes  Materials for professional development  Local program data collection  Program dissemination  DDMs analysis  Travel to state and national Title II-B meetings

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 28 DESIGN YOUR BUDGET  Funds may not be used for  Equipment (single item costing $5,000 or more)  Instructional materials or equipment for use by students of participating educators  Space rental  Food  Full-time staff positions.  Grant funds may not be allocated to pay for both a participant’s graduate credit tuition and to provide a stipend

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 29 DESIGN YOUR BUDGET  Indirect costs, may not exceed 8%  Administrative costs and indirect costs combined may not exceed 20% of the total budget  Consultant fees may not exceed $100 per hour, up to $750 per day  Please request ONLY what you actually intend to spend

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 30 SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSAL  Review your proposal (objective reader)  Allow time for obtaining necessary signatures  Mail  2 complete proposal packages with original signature   1 complete copy of entire proposal (excel workbook)  Syllabus with sample session  Other documents that are part of your proposal  Submit on time: must be received by 5 pm on Monday, January 26, 2015 to be considered Subject: "2014 MMSP Competitive Application"

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 31 REVIEW PROCESS  A proposal will be disqualified if: it is late, incomplete, or it does not meet the eligibility requirements.  Proposal review is based on the required application components and the scoring rubric (See Additional Information).  The results of the review will be reported to the Commissioner for his final determination.

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 32 TIMELINE Proposals Due January 26 Review January 27 – February 27 Recommendations to the CommissionerEarly March Announcement of Awards Mid March Grants Management ProcessingMid March Official Notification and Initial Funds Disbursement Early April Project Start Early April

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 33 Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator Contacts

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 34 QUESTION/ANSWER

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 35 Networking and Collaboration Time