SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PM 2.5 Carbon Measurements in EPA Region 10 Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Advertisements

Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Chemical Composition of Organic Carbon Fractions Barbara Zielinska.
Carbon artifact adjustments for the IMPROVE and CSN speciated particulate networks Mark Green, Judith Chow, John Watson Desert Research Institute Ann Dillner.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Overview of CSN Data Relevant to OC/EC Artifact Adjustments presented by James Flanagan RTI International Davis, CA January 22-23, 2008.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Use of National PM2.5 and Speciation Network Measurements for Model Evaluation For presentation at PM Model Performance Workshop February 10-11, 2004:
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Recent Finnish PM studies / 2 examples. Characterizing temporal and spatial patterns of urban PM10 using six years of Finnish monitoring data Pia Anttila.
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Plume-in-Grid Modeling for PM & Mercury Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 5th Annual CMAS.
IMPROVE Ion Study Plan Presented by Marc Pitchford to the RPO Technical Groups Dallas, TX 12/3/02.
Is there need to collect routine ammonia/ammonium measurements in ambient air monitoring networks? Perspectives of a Data Analyst from a Small State Air.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Urban vs. Rural Atlanta An assessment of : 1)PM2.5 composition and trends 2)The Atlanta Urban Heat Island Effect.
MRPO Nitrate and Organic Speciation Special Studies Donna Kenski National RPO Technical Meeting Dallas, Dec. 3-4, 2002.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
X. Zhang, J. Liu, E. T. Parker and R. J. Weber
Estimating the Contribution of Smoke and Its Fuel Types to Fine Particulate Carbon using a Hybrid- CMB Model Bret A. Schichtel and William C. Malm - NPS.
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
Data Analysis/Monitoring Session OAQPS Updates Neil Frank RPO National Workgroup Meeting Dallas TX December 3-4, 2002.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Eric Edgerton, ARA, Inc. PM Model Performance Workshop Chapel Hill, NC February 10, 2004 SEARCH: Overview of Data for Model Performance Evaluation Photo.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
Measurements of Trace Gases and PM 2.5 Mass and Composition near the Ground and at 254 m agl During TexAQS 2000 and Comparison with Other Regions K. Baumann,
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004 ) Washington University, St. Louis CIRA/NPS VIEWS Team.
Correlations between DTT Activity and PM Constituents Wing Tuet April
Elements of a Weight of Evidence Determination
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
National Wildlife Refuge
Source Apportionment of Water Soluble Elements, EC/OC, and BrC by PMF
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Characterization of Aerosols at Fire Station 8, Atlanta, GA
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
K. Baumann, M.E. Chang, V. Dookwah, S. Lee, A.G. Russell
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
New Approaches to Air Measurements in AOSR
TFMM PM Assessment Report
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
Continuous Carbon and NHy Measurements
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Robin L. Dennis Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003

Outline SEARCH Overview Data Quality for Continuous PM Carbon Collaboration NH 3 Measurements Biomass Emissions In-Plume Oxidation Rates SO 4 Neutralization Other

SEARCH SouthEastern Aerosol Research and CHaracterization Study Jefferson Street Site (JST) Atlanta, GA Yorkville Site (YRK) Yorkville, GA

Oak Grove Centreville Pensacola Yorkville Jefferson Street North Birmingham Gulfport OLF #8 rural urban suburban SEARCH Network

SEARCH Measurements - Continuous CategoryObservables Temporal Resolution Trace Gases O 3, NO, NO 2, HNO 3, NH x, NOy, CO, SO 2, CO 2 1 min. Fine Particles Mass, BC, B scat SO 4 2-,NO 3, NH 4 + TC <10 min. or 60 min. Surface Met. T, RH, BP, WS, WD SR, precip. 1 min. Hg (2 sites)Hg(0), RGM, TPM60 min.

SEARCH Measurements - Discrete CategoryAnalyte(s) Frequency ( ) PM 2.5 MassDaily PM 2.5 SO 4 2-,NO 3, NH 4 + OC, EC Trace Elements 1/3 PM coarse Mass1/3 PM coarse SO 4 2-,NO 3, NH 4 + Trace Elements 1/6 PM coarse OC, EC1/6 (2 sites) Note: all measurements blank corrected

Comparisons of Continuous and Discrete PM Measurements in SEARCH

SEARCH TEOM Configuration Nafion drier 30C Heavy insulation (thermal shock) Filter change every 3 days

Yorkville TEOM vs. FRM 2002 Median absolute difference = 0.84 ug/m3 Median absolute % difference = 6.8 No seasonality

ARA Continuous SO4 Harvard SO4 analyzer –Denuders to remove SO2 (carbonate) and reduced S gases (C monolith) –Reduction of SO4 to SO2 on hot SS (850+C) –Automated zeroing every 90 minutes –1-minute data acquisition Mean and s.d. each averaging interval

ARA Continuous NO3/NH4 3-channel analyzer for NH4 and NO3 NH4 via oxidation to NO on hot Pt NO3 via reduction to NO on Mo Remove gas phase species with acid/base denuders and C monolith Detection via NO-ozone CL 1-minute data acquisition

Time Series of 24-Hr SO /2/20028/3/20028/4/20028/5/20028/6/20028/7/20028/8/20028/9/2002 8/10/20028/11/20028/12/20028/13/20028/14/20028/15/20028/16/20028/17/20028/18/20028/19/20028/20/20028/21/20028/22/20028/23/20028/24/20028/25/20028/26/20028/27/20028/28/20028/29/20028/30/20028/31/2002 9/1/20029/2/20029/3/20029/4/20029/5/20029/6/20029/7/20029/8/2002 Filter SO4PILS SO4ARA SO4 SO4 (ug/m3)

Time Series of Hourly SO /23/02 0:00 8/23/02 12:00 8/24/02 0:00 8/24/02 12:00 8/25/02 0:00 8/25/02 12:00 8/26/02 0:00 8/26/02 12:00 8/27/02 0:00 8/27/02 12:00 8/28/02 0:00 8/28/02 12:00 8/29/02 0:00 8/29/02 12:00 8/30/02 0:00 8/30/02 12:00 8/31/02 0:00 8/31/02 12:00 9/1/02 0:00 9/1/02 12:00 9/2/02 0:00 9/2/02 12:00 9/3/02 0:00 9/3/02 12:00 9/4/02 0:00 9/4/02 12:00 9/5/02 0:00 9/5/02 12:00 9/6/02 0:00 9/6/02 12:00 9/7/02 0:00 9/7/02 12:00 9/8/02 0:00 ARA SO4PILS SO4 SO4 (ug/m3)

Continuous vs. Filter SO 4 2- at Yorkville (using CE = 0.82)

Hourly SO 4 2- PILS vs. ARA Continuous Atlanta, GA - August 2002 (using CE = 0.86)

Time Series of 24-hr NH 4 + NH4 (ug/m3)

Time Series of Hourly NH /23/02 0:00 8/23/02 12:00 8/24/02 0:00 8/24/02 12:00 8/25/02 0:00 8/25/02 12:00 8/26/02 0:00 8/26/02 12:00 8/27/02 0:00 8/27/02 12:00 8/28/02 0:00 8/28/02 12:00 8/29/02 0:00 8/29/02 12:00 8/30/02 0:00 8/30/02 12:00 8/31/02 0:00 8/31/02 12:00 9/1/02 0:00 9/1/02 12:00 9/2/02 0:00 9/2/02 12:00 9/3/02 0:00 9/3/02 12:00 9/4/02 0:00 9/4/02 12:00 9/5/02 0:00 9/5/02 12:00 9/6/02 0:00 9/6/02 12:00 9/7/02 0:00 9/7/02 12:00 9/8/02 0:00 ARA NH4PILS NH4 NH4 (ug/m3)

Scattergram of Hourly NH 4 +

Time Series of 24-hr NO 3 -

Time Series of Hourly NO /23/02 0:00 8/23/02 12:00 8/24/02 0:00 8/24/02 12:00 8/25/02 0:00 8/25/02 12:00 8/26/02 0:00 8/26/02 12:00 8/27/02 0:00 8/27/02 12:00 8/28/02 0:00 8/28/02 12:00 8/29/02 0:00 8/29/02 12:00 8/30/02 0:00 8/30/02 12:00 8/31/02 0:00 8/31/02 12:00 9/1/02 0:00 9/1/02 12:00 9/2/02 0:00 9/2/02 12:00 9/3/02 0:00 9/3/02 12:00 9/4/02 0:00 9/4/02 12:00 9/5/02 0:00 9/5/02 12:00 9/6/02 0:00 9/6/02 12:00 9/7/02 0:00 9/7/02 12:00 9/8/02 0:00 ARA NO3PILS NO3 NO3 (ug/m3)

Continuous vs. Filter Summary 24-Hr Averages (JST) MAE = median abs. error; MAPE = median abs. % error

Ongoing Comparison Work in VISTAS Millbrook Site –R&P 8400S (SO4) vs. HSPH SO4 –R&P 8400N (NO3) vs. ARA NO3 –R&P 5400 (EC) vsAethalometer (BC) –ARA NH4 vs. STN NH4

SEARCH/ARIES Collaboration on Carbonaceous Aerosol Historical Samples ( SEARCH/Improve/STN) –Composite Monthly or Seasonal Quartz Filters –Detailed Speciation (GC/MS) –CMB analysis for major sources Planned Samples ( SEARCH 4 sites/VISTAS 5 –Collect hi-vol samples 4 SEARCH sites, 5 VISTAS sites –Detailed Speciation/CMB and 14 C for Selected Events

Primary Carbon Source Attribution Sample Matrix January -December = 4 one-month composite; one for each quarter 6= 2 six-month composite; summer & winter 3= 2 three-month composite; summer &winter D= 30 daily samples ; July’01 & Jan’02

Sources of Primary OC in PM 2.5 (F) (F/M ?) (F) (M) (Secondary F/M?)

Simplified Organic Carbon Source Matrix Combination of CMB and C-14 data allows calculation of secondary OC by difference.

OC Source Matrix Atlanta, GA – January * 2000 Data: Zheng et al., ES&T, Primary* Secondary Total # Modern 64 <5 61 +/-5 Fossil 36 <5 39 +/-5 # from 14 Cdata

OC Source Matrix Atlanta, GA – July 2001 * Zheng et al. Source Apportionment of Fine Particles at Atlanta, GA, AAAR 2002 Primary* Secondary Total # Modern <5 > /-5 Fossil 40* <5 41 +/-5 # from 14 C data

SEARCH NH 3 Measurements Oak Grove Centreville Pensacola Yorkville Jefferson St. N.Birmingham Gulfport OLF rural urban suburban 24-hour denuder (1/3 day) all sites Continuous at Yorkville (9/15/03) and Oak Grove (1/15/04)

Total Reduced Nitrogen (NH x ) Diagram

Continuous NH 3 vs Denuder NH 3 24 Hour Samples Gaseous NH 3 is deduced by subtracting particulate NH 4 from NH x

NH 3 Time-Series 9/12/03 – 9/30/03 Yorkville, GA SEARCH Site Gaseous NH 3 is deduced by subtracting particulate NH 4 from TRN

HNO 3, NH 3, NH 4 NO 3 Event 9/24/03 – 9/27/03 Yorkville, GA SEARCH Site

1-hour NH x vs. Wind Direction

1.8 km 2.3 km 4.5 km The Smoking Chicken

HMS Fire and Smoke Summary for /21/03 Emissions from Biomass Burning Oak Grove

Bsp (m -1 ) WD and B sp for Oak Grove – 10/21/03

CO and NOy at Oak Grove – 10/21/03

NOy vs. CO Oak Grove Event – 10/21/03

Comparison of ERs with Literature Values

Field Observations of SO2 Oxidation Rates in Coal Fired Power Plant Plumes E. S. Edgerton, B. E. Hartsell, C. J. Waid, ARA, Inc. J. J. Jansen, Southern Company D. Alan Hansen, EPRI AAAR 2003 Anaheim, CA October 22, 2003

SO2 and SO4 8/20/02 Event

Daytime Pattern of Observed Oxidation (n = 28)

Continuous PM at Jefferson Street August 16, 2001

SO4, xsNH4 and Molar Ratio

Background adjusted Molar Ratio

SEARCH/VISTAS Collaboration on Characterization of Meteorology and its Relationships to Fine Particle Mass and Visibility in the VISTAS Region

Summary SEARCH network will provide comprehensive PM/trace gas data through 2005 Filter data needed to characterize continuous PM technologies –Data adjustments –Data uncertainty Carbon speciation work underway (primary vs.secondary, Modern vs. Fossil) NH3 measurements begun in the SE –Primary species: high and variable near sources, expect lower and less variable near sinks Combination of continuous PM and Gas measurements shows promise –SO4 neutralization variability –Contributions from biomass burning –gas/particle conversion