Faculty Meeting Wednesday, January 16, 2008 Lorelei Coddington CGU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
California Teacher Performance Assessment (CalTPA) #1 Workshop
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Mentoring/Assessing & Scoring the edTPA Mara Manson Ed.D September 20, 2013.
Kelly Vaughn, PhD Assistant Professor School of Education & Leadership Notre Dame de Namur University Background and Overview of Performance Assessment.
Kansas Performance Teaching Portfolio
Task 3 Assessing Student Learning
E-portfolio in TaskStream (DRF) Signature Assignments Signature Assignments Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd semesters) Classroom Community (1 st & 2 nd.
Teacher Performance Assessment
Teaching Event –commentaries –written responses to a set of task-specific prompts. –provide contextual information needed to understand the artifacts and.
Teachers for a New Era Presentation Ryan Jones Manchester High School.
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
California Teaching Performance Assessment (CA TPA)
Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA). PlanningInstruction (Engaging students & supporting learning) AssessmentReflection Academic language Student Voice.
Brian Yusko Associate Dean of Academic Programs Subject and grade-level specific.
Principles of Assessment
Strategies for Efficient Scoring Jeanne Stone, UC Irvine PACT Conference October 22, 2009.
CA Teacher Performance Assessments Orientation
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
Subject Specific Pedagogy Task 1 Multiple Subject Credential Program Division of Curriculum and Instruction Charter College of Education.
TPAC - Task 2 By Dora L. Bailey, An analysis of the effects of teaching on students’ learning (the “so what”) Video Tape should : 2.
PACT Areas that are Scored 1. Context for Learning 2. Planning 3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Reflection 6. Academic Language strand that runs across.
John Seelke University of Maryland College Park Preparing and Supporting Candidates for the edTPA 1.
WELCOME TO SPRING QUARTER 2007 We are ALMOST there! iv. Sample Graduation Requirements and Integration Plan 2007b (Stanford)
A California Perspective Sally Mearns, with thanks to: Phyllis Jacobson, California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Helene Chan, PACT Guru.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
TPA Task 2 Calibration Claremont Graduate University Sonja Lopez.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
Task 1: Planning for Instruction and Assessment
1 Teaching Performance Assessment California State University Fullerton Single Subject Credential Program Presentation developed by V. Costa, Department.
Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) August 25, 2014.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
CALIFORNIA TEACHER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (CALTPA) #4 WORKSHOP Facilitator Stacy A. Griffin, Ed.D
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Task 2 Instructing and Engaging Students in Learning.
Assessing Scientific Inquiry  Presented by:. Goals for Scoring Sessions  Learn to reliably score student work using the Scoring Guide.  Understand.
Remediation of Failing Candidates UC San Diego, Education Studies Bobbie Allen Chris Halter Rachel Millstone.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
WELCOME TO WINTER QUARTER 2007 We are halfway there! iii. Sample Graduation Requirements & Integration Plan 2007a (Stanford.
1 California Teaching Performance Assessment Background.
1 The Thinking Behind · PACT· abridged & amended (amendled) Performance Assessment for California Teachers Raymond Pecheone Raymond Pecheone Stanford University.
EdTPA: Elementary Literacy
TEACHER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS OVERVIEW LIT CENTER MINI LESSON A.STREET FALL
Michael Bohannan National University Domain B: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
California Teacher Performance Assessment (CalTPA) #2 Workshop Facilitator: Stacy A. Griffin, Ed.D
EdTPA Resident Teacher Breakfast, UC Davis Multiple Subject Teacher Education.
1. How can we gather and use evidence of the qualities of teaching performance that inspire, engage, and sustain students as learners – to improve teaching.
1 Disclaimer This resource is provided for informational and support purposes only. There is no requirement that it be used as- is or as a template by.
Learning to Teach System Skill Building Three.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Information & Training Session
California Teaching Performance Assessment
EdTPA, Pro-Cert, National Boards
New Student Experience
TEACHING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT UPDATE
Oregon Teacher Standards & Practices Commission July 24, 2013
TEACHING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT UPDATE
Georgia Department of Education
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Tennessee edTPA Conference
ISU Teacher Education Quality Assurance System
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Meeting Wednesday, January 16, 2008 Lorelei Coddington CGU

Agenda  Welcome  TPA Task 3 Assessing Learning  TPA Task 3 Calibration  LUNCH  Small Group Discussion/Planning  Task 4 Culminating Teaching Experience

Review Task 3 Assessing Learning  Assemble into groups of four with at least one resident “expert”  Walk through exemplar (score level 4) benchmark task and identify steps/components of the Task  Using the Venn diagram compare/contrast the skills and knowledge needed from Task 2, Designing Instruction to Task 3 Assessing Learning.

Assessing Learning Task Step 1:Assessment Selection and Planning for the Whole Class A. Academic Content Selection B. Assessment Planning Step 2:Learning about Whole Class and Two Focus Students Student 1: An English Learner Student 2: A Student With an Identified Special Need Step 3:Assessment Adaptations for Two Focus Students A. Adaptation for Student 1 B. Adaptation for Student 2 Step 4:Giving the Assessment to the Whole Class, Including Two Focus Students Step 5:Analyzing Evidence of Student Academic Learning and the Assessment Step 6:Reflection on Assessment Implementation and Student Learning

Task 3 - Assessing Learning  Focus is on choosing an appropriate assessment to go with content selection and instruction  Adds TPE 3 “Interpretation and Use of Assessments”  FS 2 is a student with an identified special need (IEP, 504, GATE)  Must teach the lesson and collect and analyze student samples  Assessment artifacts must be submitted with permission slips

Task 3 - Assessing Learning  Multiple subject candidates are to choose a Social Studies or Science lesson  Single Subject candidates are to choose a different class and different topic from the Task 2  Single Subject Spanish are to choose a student who represents a different instructional challenge in place of an English Learner  All are to choose different focus students than those in Task 2

Re-calibration  Assessors will be assigned a permanent number  Review rubric language  Look at the preponderance of evidence  ROE - typical places to find information  Numbering sections helps!  Final scoring statement  Factors known to promote bias

Factors Known to Prompt Bias  “Fatal Flaw”  Issues of Familiarity  Student Ability/Level of Class  Learning Environment  Personal Characteristics of the Teacher Candidate  Writing Prompts

Let’s Calibrate!

TPA Task 3 - Assessing Learning  Focus Question: What do our interns need to KNOW in order to be successful in completing the Assessing Learning Task? What do our interns need to KNOW in order to be successful in completing the Assessing Learning Task?

Task 4 - Culminating Teaching Experience

Culminating Teaching Experience Task Step 1:Learning about the Whole Class and Two Focus Students Student 1: An English Learner Student 2: A Student With a Different Instructional Challenge Step 2:Learning Environment and Academic Instructional Planning for the Whole Class Step 3:Lesson Adaptations for the Two Focus Students Step 4:Teaching and Video-recording the Lesson: Whole Class, including Two Focus Students Step 5:Analyzing the Lesson Step 6:Reflection after Instruction

Culminating Teaching Experience ROETPETask Steps GS8, 92 LAS8, 91 CE10, 112, 4-video PFI6, 7, 8, 92, 4-video MA6, 7, 8, 93, 5, 4-video PS1, 4, 5, 6, 72, 4-video AESL2, 35, 6 R136 Aspects of Teaching on

Video Evidence  Evidence found in the video should connect with the evidence found in the written response  Evidence in the video should compliment, reinforce, and support the written evidence  Video evidence is an additional piece of evidence and should be weighted equally with other pieces of evidence found in the written response