Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSEG Project Project Update. Topics n Data Requirements and Recommendations n Assessment of Local Data Quality.
Advertisements

Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
SPECIAL EDUCATION REPORT UPDATE Data Quality Council Meeting November 7, 2013.
PIMS Basics: Who Reports What to Whom and How the Data is Used
Special Education Data collection and reporting. SPED Data Collected Graduation/Drop Out (ISEE) State Assessment Participation/Performance (Assessment)
> Special Education Data … Communication is Critical for Reporting Special Ed Data to PennData & PIMS… Congruency Matters for.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
July 2014 Submission Presented by: Jill Budny Phone: New Special Ed Data
April 2009 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Positive Behavior Specialist.
Special Education Data Collection and Reporting Data Collection, Verification, and Reporting Timelines Sara Berscheit / Steve W. Smith 2009 COSA Conference.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Career, Vocational, and Transition Planning Fall 2011 Drake University.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Georgia CTI Fall Conference November 11, 2011 Atlanta,
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
WHAT IS EMIS? Education Management Information System Established by law in 1989, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) provides the architecture.
Minnesota Continuous Improvement Process: Program Evaluation Report Writing Post School Outcome and Parent Survey Minnesota Department of Education Conference.
ISES UPDATES August 28, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Pennsylvania Information Management System (PIMS) Capital Area IU – PennData Group Meeting Sharon Clark, PIMS Project Director Dave Ream, PIMS Project.
B-1: Graduation Percent of youth with an IEP graduating from high school with a regular diploma Measurement – Michigan identified >80% as the target for.
DQN Debrief/Review/Clarification Did we all hear the same thing? What questions remain?
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
SPP/APR Updates June SPP – State Performance Plan –Establishes baseline data and sets targets through school year for 20 Indicators APR.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Navigating System Performance Review and Improvement (SPR&I) Oregon Department of Education Fall
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Penn Data Completion  Revised Student Database  Tables 1-7  Sign Off Procedure  Preschool Report – Aggregate.
Special Education Federal Child Count Reporting NOVEMBER 2015.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Special Education Data Review February February –APR submitted February 15 –Indicator 4 (Discipline) review of policies, procedures, and practices.
YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
THE EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER SELPA. Steering Meeting | October 21 * Denotes a handout SELPA Information Sharing Finance * Legislative Updates:  SB 172.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
Reporting a Student thru Different PIMS Submissions Barry Frye Manager of Student Data Information Systems Appalachia Intermediate Unit 08 1.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Schuld.
July Special Ed Data Reporting… Remember…Special Education is Special!
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
1 December 1 This is a Test! It’s About Your Data Barry Frye Manager of Student Data Information Systems Appalachia Intermediate Unit 08.
July 2017 Special Education Collection
Special Ed Data Reporting
What is “Annual Determination?”
Collection 1 October Student Data Set
ACT 16 Special Education Collection
Data Collection Contact
New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Special Education Collections
Special Education Collections
PennData/PIMS Special Ed
Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Felton
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
Special Education Discipline
SPR&I Regional Training
Kentucky School for the Blind
STARS Changes In Special Education
Presentation transcript:

Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting

Why is the data collected? Federal IDEA funding State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Special Education Data Report Targets Compliance Monitoring Corrective Action and LEA Determinations Accountability

State Performance Plan Indicator 1Graduation rates Indicator 2 Dropout rates Indicator 3 Student participation and performance on statewide assessments (PSSA/PASA) Indicator 4 Suspension and expulsion rates Indicator 5 Educational placement (Least Restrictive Environment, or LRE) Indicator 8 School facilitated parent involvement Indicator 9 Disproportionate representation by race/ethnicity Indicator 10 Disproportionate representation by race/ethnicity in disability categories Indicator 11 Timelines for initial evaluation Indicator 13 Postsecondary transition goals and services Indicator 14 Postsecondary outcomes

Data Sources Main Source - IEP, ER, NOREP (Teachers, Directors, Psychologist) Staff (Tables 1-3) -Human Resources/Business Dept. Table 8A – Initial Evaluation Report (ER) Discipline Table 9A & 13 - Principals/Safe Schools – Table 13 Children Subject to Expulsion - includes all students in grades K-12 (including regular education students)

Who Submits? School District of Residence Who Else Submits: – Charter School – Foster Parent Home District (1305) – School District Where County Prison Is Located Who Does Not Submit: – IU – Educating School District (if different that the Resident School District) – APS – County Prison – CTC – PRRI – SJCI You Do Not Submit These Students: – Students educated in state adult and state juvenile correctional facilities. (These are reported by PA Department of Corrections Education)

Best Practices Accuracy starts with student enrollment Check/Analyze data monthly Sync SIS and Special Ed systems Keep data current in systems – IEP, ER, RR, exit data, discipline data, staff Plan timelines so IEPs are not due at the end of November

Submission Timelines Oct – Act 16 Dec – Child Count, Table 14 July – Staff, Exits, Discipline July/Quarterly - Table 8A April - Table 8 MOE/CEIS (submitted by IU with information from Districts) Data validation timelines defined locally by IU

December vs. July Submissions December Child Count – Active Students with a valid IEP on December 1 – PIMS Special Ed Snapshot – PIMS Student Template July Child Count – Only Students exiting Special Ed during school year (7/1 - 6/30) – PIMS Special Ed Snapshot – PIMS Student Template – Supplemental Tables Staff (Tables 1 – 3) Initial Evals (Table 8A)* Discipline (Table 9A) Expulsions (Table 13) * On cyclical monitoring year.

Submission Process

Comparison Reports Data submitted this year compared to last year’s data. Provide Justification: – Was there an increase in a particular population within the LEA? Why? – Was there a change in personnel or programming that caused a particular category to increase? What? – Was there a change in policies or procedures that caused a change in reporting categories? What? – Small N size

PIMS Special Ed Snapshot District AUN Location Code (within district of residence) – field 2 School Year Date PA Secure ID Teacher Name Primary Disability Secondary Disability Amount of Special Education Services Type of Support Educational Environment Educational Environment Percentage Exit Date Exit Reason Service Provider Location of Special Ed Services – field 71

PIMS Student Template Current Grade Level Birth Date Gender Address Race/Ethnicity Code Challenge Type Special Education (38) LEP Participation Name (First, Last, Suffix, Middle)

Staff Tables Table 1 – Special Ed Teachers and Paraprofessionals providing services to children with disabilities, Ages 3-5 – Highly Qualified / Not Highly Qualified Table 2 – Special Ed Teachers and Paraprofessionals providing services to children with disabilities, Ages 6-21 – Highly Qualified / Not Highly Qualified Table 3 – Personnel providing related services for children with disabilities, Ages 3-21 – Fully Certified / Not Fully Certified

Discipline Tables Table 9A – Reported by student – Unilateral Removal by School Personnel For Drugs, Weapons, Serious Bodily Injury – Unilateral Removal by Hearing Officer – Out of School Suspensions – In School Suspensions

Expulsion Table Table 13 – Expulsions for Special Ed and Regular Ed Receiving educational services Not Receiving educational services

Resources Intermediate Units PIMS Manuals: – - Administrators/PIMS/Pages/default.aspx - Administrators/PIMS/Pages/default.aspx – Volume 1 - Domains – Volume 2 - Appendix (where you will find specific codes) PennData Website: – Contains: Special Education Resource Guide/July Submission Guide/State Performance Plan/Table 8A Template – – Penn Data Managers: Edna Website: –