1. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP)

2. Focus “The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities shall be on improving education results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities ”

4. Monitoring Priorities 616(a)(3) The Secretary shall monitor States and require each state to monitor its LEAs using quantifiable indicators to measure performance in the following areas: 1. FAPE in the LRE 2. Disproportionality 3. Effective General Supervision

5. State Performance Plan Reporting 616(b)(2)(C) States must annually collect data in these priority areas to analyze the performance of each LEA. Each state must report annually to the Secretary on its performance under its performance plan. States must report annually to the public on the performance of each LEA on the identified targets in the state’s performance plan.

6. Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) Nash-Rocky Mount Data Story

7. Indicator 1 Graduation 2007- 2008 Data State Target: 80% NRMPS: 43.6% 2008– 2009 Data State Target: 80% NRMPS: 46.7% Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma.

8. Indicator 2 Drop Out 2007– 2008 Data State Target: 6.5% NRMPS: 11.8% 2008 – 2009 Data State Target: 6.0% NRMPS: Rate not calculated at this time Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school.

9. Indicator 3 Assessment Participation and performance of children with disabilities on statewide assessment. State Target 2007-08 = 25% of LEAs meeting AYP State Target 2008-09 = 45% of LEAs meeting AYP NRMPS did not meet AYP.

10. Indicator 3 Assessment Participation/Reading Grade07-08 399.5 498.8 597.5 686.2 794.0 895.7 10100 Grade08-09 395.0 4 5 6 7 8 1095.0 Grade08-09 399.3 4100 5 699.3 798.5 893.1 1064.5 State Target NRMPS 2007-08 Data NRMPS 2008-09 Data

11. Indicator 3 Assessment Participation/Math Grade07-08 399.5 498.8 597.5 687.4 794.7 895.8 1091.7 Grade08-09 395.0 4 5 6 7 8 1095.0 Grade08-09 399.3 4100 5 699.3 797.8 893.1 1057.4 State Target NRMPS 2007-08 Data NRMPS 2008-09 Data

12. Indicator 3 Assessment Performance/Reading Grade07-08 319.5 425.5 519.5 614.3 713.5 820.9 1012.2 Grade08-09 343.2 4 5 6 7 8 1038.5 Grade08-09 329.9 428.1 521.6 627.5 725.2 828.1 1012.8 State Target NRMPS 2007-08 Data NRMPS 2008-09 Data

13. Indicator 3 Assessment Performance/Math Grade07-08 341.3 438.7 526.8 622.4 725.5 827.0 1036.0 Grade08-09 377.2 4 5 6 7 8 1068.4 Grade08-09 351.0 442.5 5 640.1 739.6 846.3 1033.3 State Target NRMPS 2007-08 Data NRMPS 2008-09 Data

14. Indicator 4 Suspension/Expulsion Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater. State Target 2007-08 = 8% of LEAs State Target 2008-09 = 8% NRMPS = 0 %

15. Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 served in regular, separate, or public, private, home or hospital settings.

16. Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment 2008-09 Regular63.6% Separate16.1% Public/ Private/ Home/ Hospital 2.1% State Targets: 2007-08 Regular62.6% Separate16.5% Public/ Private/ Home/ Hospital 2.1%

17. Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment NRMPS 2007-08 Data 2008-09 Data 07-08 Regular56.8% Separate22.0% Public/ Private/ Home/ Hospital 0.7% 08-09 Regular53.8% Separate20.6% Public/ Private/ Home/ Hospital 0.5%

18. Indicator 7 Preschool Outcomes Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in:  Positive social-emotional skills,  Acquisition and use of knowledge, and  Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

19. Indicator 7 Proposed State Targets Positive social- emotional skills SS 1 – 88.0%SS 2 – 57.5% Acquisition of knowledge SS 1 – 87.6%SS 2 – 55.1% Use of appropriate behaviors SS 1 – 87.9%SS 2 – 68.8%

20. Indicator 7 LEA Data Positive Social- Emotional Skills SS 1 – 77.0 %SS 2 – 54.0 % Acquisition of Knowledge SS 1 – 96.0 %SS 2 – 61.0 % Use of Appropriate Behaviors SS 1 – 71.0 %SS 2- 61.0 % 20

21. Indicator 8 Parent Involvement Percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities. State Target: 2008-09 = 39.2% NRMPS Data: Not Sampled

22. Indicator 9 Disproportionality Spec Ed Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. State Target 0% State data indicated no LEA has significant disproportionate representation across all disability categories combined.

23. Indicator 10 Disproportionality by Category Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. State target: 0% NRMPS: 0 %

24. Indicator 11 90 Day Timeline Percent of children referred for whom a referral was received and placement determined within 90 days. State Target: 100% NRMPS 2007-2008 82.3 % NRMPS 2008-2009 86.3 %

25. Indicator 12 Part C to Part B Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their third birthday. State Target: 100% NRMPS 2007-08 Data 85.0 % NRMPS 2008-09 Data 97.0 %

26. Indicator 13 IEPs and Postsecondary Goals Indicator 13: Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.

27. Indicator 13 IEPs and Postsecondary Goals State Target: 100% NRMPS 2007-08 Data 100 % NRMPS 2008-09 Data 100 %

28. Indicator 14 Post-School Outcomes Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school. State Target: 2008-09 = 75% NRMPS Data: Not Sampled

29. Indicator 15 General Supervision Part 1 Percent of noncompliance identified in the 2007-2008 school year corrected within one year. State Target: 100% NRMPS 2007-08 Data 100 % NRMPS 2008-09 Data 100 %

30. Indicator 15 General Supervision Part 2 Percent of compliance rate of Internal Record Review. State Target: 100% NRMPS 2007-08 Data 100 % NRMPS 2008-09 Data 100 %

31. Questions?