Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
Advertisements

Implications of climate change on fire and thinning prescriptions
Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
H EURISTIC S OLVER  Builds and tests alternative fuel treatment schedules (solutions) at each iteration  In each iteration:  Evaluates the effects of.
FVS, State - Transition Model Assumptions, and Yield tables – an Application in National Forest Planning Eric Henderson Analyst, Hiawatha National Forest,
The Wildfire Climate Relationship in the Selway- Bitterroot Wilderness: Using Management Strategies to Return Wildfire to Wilderness Landscapes.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
The Natural Disturbance Regime: Implications for Forest Management Glen W. Armstrong University of Alberta CIFFC Science Forum 4 November 1999.
Carbon Information Needed to Support Forest Management Bob Davis, Director Of Planning, Watershed And Air, USDA Forest Service 0.
Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Wildland Fire Decision Support Tools Managing Long Duration Wildfires Workshop Salt Lake City, UT April 30 – May 1, 2008 Missoula, MT May 6-7, 2008 Wildland.
Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center,
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Copyright © 2003 Americas’ SAP Users’ Group Simple Document Management in Project Systems Kent Bettisworth BETTISWORTH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tuesday, May.
Farsite Export Model ARCGIS 9 Volker Mell GIS Analyst Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Production Function Analysis of Human Factors Influencing Wildfire Risk in the WUI This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will.
This document is contained within the Fire Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of interest,
EXPECTATIONS -FS Training course for FARSITE is 60hrs long. -It's own software separate from ArcGIS with it's own quirks and limitations. -Two week lab.
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
1 Spatially Explicit Burn Probability across A Landscape in Extreme Fire Weather Year Wenbin Cui, David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.
Controls on Fire in the Pacific Northwest: Climate, Fuels, and Land Management Dave Peterson & Don McKenzie Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific.
Mark Finney, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT.
Incorporating Landscape Fuel Treatment Modeling into the Forest Vegetation Simulator Robert C. Seli Alan A. Ager Nicholas L. Crookston Mark A. Finney Berni.
Talat Odman, Aditya Pophale, Rushabh Sakhpara, Yongtao Hu, Michael Chang and Ted Russell Georgia Institute of Technology AQAST 9 at Saint Louis University.
Non-Burning Alternatives: Wildlands Prepared by Jones & Stokes December 2002.
Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Centre for Non-Timber Resources Royal Roads University Victoria, BC Cost Benefit Analysis of Wildland Urban Interface Operations.
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Oct-03Learning to Use FOFEM 5: Advanced Lesson Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management Learning to Use FOFEM 5 Volume II:
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
00-1-S290-EP Unit 0 Introduction S290-EP Unit 0 Introduction Unit 0 Introduction.
Planning for Inventory & Monitoring Chip Scott National Inventory & Monitoring Applications Center (FIA-NIMAC) Northern Research Station U.S. Forest Service.
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Fire and Fuels 8/31/2010. OXYGEN HEAT FUEL THE FIRE TRIANGLE FIRE.
Involvement in SW Jemez Mountains Landscape Restoration Project (SWJMLRP), under CFLRP March 12, 2015 PUEBLO OF JEMEZ.
SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELING OF COLORADO PLATEAU LANDSCAPES FROM CONCEPTUAL MODELS TO A COMPUTER SYSTEM Chew, Jimmie D., Kirk Moeller, and Chris Stalling.
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Development of Wildland Fire Emission Inventories with the BlueSky Smoke Modeling Framework Sean Raffuse, Erin Gilliland, Dana Sullivan, Neil Wheeler,
USDA Forest Service Joint Action Group for National Wildland Fire Weather Needs Assessment - Agency Needs USDA Forest Service Research and Development.
September 28, 2005Ph III/IV Project Team1 Phase III/IV Planning EIs Update and Status Report.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
A Traditional vs. Ecosystem Services Approach to Surface Water Management September 16, 2010 PRESENTED BY Carol Murdock, Clackamas County WES Mark Anderson,
What Drives Fire Frequency, Intensity, and Spread (focused on the Rocky Mountains) Aka: Fuels vs. Climate Bottom up or Top down Local vs Regional.
Central Sierra Interagency Resource Advisor Training Wildland Fire Implementation Plan Mike Beasley Fire Use Manager Yosemite National Park
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
Natural Tree Regeneration after Wildfire in Oregon: Pros and Cons Presented by: Tara Jennings.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
Warm Up 1.What are some different ways that water can become polluted? 2.List 2 things that wildfires need in order to occur. Time’s Up!
POLICY, PLANNING, & MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Goals Objectives Monitoring.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, & Dust Emissions of Carbon from Fire Fire Emissions Joint Forum Presented by – Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc. May 23, 2006.
Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed Introduction to FFI: Why and how FFI was developed 04/02/2013.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall.
FOR 350 Silvicultural Terminology Review
July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories
Inter-RPO 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon

Outline What is FETM? How does it work? What outputs are produced?

What is FETM? Landscape-scale simulation model Evaluates annual effects of single or multiple disturbances, whether natural or management related Any spatial domain Any time period from 1 to 300 years (annual increments)

Stochastic—Annual number of fire starts for low, moderate, high, and extreme NFDRS weather classes are treated as random variables Dynamic—Landscape composition in each year linked to previous year’s result

Non Spatial—Results are assessed by vegetation class (FCC) without regard to where those classes are located on the landscape.Non Spatial—Results are assessed by vegetation class (FCC) without regard to where those classes are located on the landscape. What is FETM?

How Does It Work? Simple Example of “State and Transition” Modeling Each state or vegetation class described by a unique Fuel Characteristic Class (FCC). Grass Seedling & Saplings Poles Grass Seed & Sap PP Pole PP Immature PP...

5 years or 20% per year 20 years or 5% per year 30 years or 3.33% per year Natural Succession Grass Seed & Sap PP Pole PP Immature PP How Does It Work?

Grass Seedling & Saplings Poles Immature 50% of fire area Low Intensity Fire Disturbances can result in a change in state, or a change in the fuel bed characteristics within a state. 0.5 How Does It Work?

Grass Seedling & Saplings Poles Immature 100% of fire area Moderate Intensity Fire 50% of fire area How Does It Work?

Grass Seedling & Saplings Poles Immature 100% of fire area High Intensity Fire 100% of fire area 1.0 How Does It Work?

Fire + Succession Only How Does It Work? Grass Seedling & Saplings Poles Immature

In reality, flow diagrams are much more complex and inter-linked:In reality, flow diagrams are much more complex and inter-linked: Multiple species groups. Multiple species groups. Multiple disturbances. Multiple disturbances. Pathways may reflect changes in species and/or density as well as changes in surface loading and configuration Pathways may reflect changes in species and/or density as well as changes in surface loading and configuration How Does It Work?

Disturbances may include:Disturbances may include: Harvesting operations Harvesting operations Mechanical fuel treatments Mechanical fuel treatments Insects & disease Insects & disease Wildfire and prescribed fire Wildfire and prescribed fire Other Other How Does It Work?

Incorporates various state-of-the- science models:Incorporates various state-of-the- science models: CONSUME – consumption, emissions CONSUME – consumption, emissions NFDRS calculations – fire behavior NFDRS calculations – fire behavior Fire type algorithm used in FARSITE Fire type algorithm used in FARSITE PCHA model – weather, fire data PCHA model – weather, fire data IIAA model – costs, breakpoint ROS IIAA model – costs, breakpoint ROS How Does It Work?

Comprehensive treatment of fire behavior linked to weather and fuel bed characteristics. Considers different fire types influenced by fuel, topography, and weather: surface, passive crown, active crown.

Annual outputs include:Annual outputs include: Vegetation composition Vegetation composition Wildfire acres by fire intensity level Wildfire acres by fire intensity level Prescribed fire acres Prescribed fire acres Smoke emissions (7 pollutants) Smoke emissions (7 pollutants) Net present value (NPV) of fire costs/benefits Net present value (NPV) of fire costs/benefits What Outputs are Produced?

Alternative 1: High Suppression/No Rx Fire Wildfire Acres – Alternative 1 Large Suppression Program/No Rx Fire

Wildfire Acres – Alternative 2 Alternative 2: High Suppression/Low Rx Fire Large Suppression Program/Low Rx Fire

Wildfire Acres – Alternative 3 Alternative 2: High Suppression/Low Rx Fire Small Suppression Program/High Rx Fire

Wildfire Acres – Alternative 4 Alternative 2: High Suppression/Low Rx Fire Small Suppression Program/Intermediate Rx Fire

Wildfire Acres – Alternative 5 Alternative 2: High Suppression/Low Rx Fire Small Suppression Program/Variable Rx Fire

Wildfire Acres by Fire Intensity Level

Alternative 2: 7,500 Chaparral Acres Per Year Northern Mixed Chaparral Density 1 Density 2 Density 3 Density 4 Density 5 Landscape Composition Changes

Results - Cost Summary ANNUALIZED PRESENT NET VALUE OF FUTURE COSTS AND REVENUES (USD, $1,000s) Alternative Program Costs Fire Suppression Fuel Treatment NVC Wildfire NVC Rx Fire Total PNV 115,0197,08902,268024, ,0195,6451,7581, , ,7445,4477, , ,7445,5583, ,05621, ,7445,6432, ,15921,336

Predicts future effects and landscapes under different management strategies and fire protection policies.Predicts future effects and landscapes under different management strategies and fire protection policies. Similar in capability to other landscape models (VDDT, for example), but addresses fire effects in a more comprehensive manner.Similar in capability to other landscape models (VDDT, for example), but addresses fire effects in a more comprehensive manner. Concluding Comments

For additional information, including model setup files, color brochure, users guide, technical documentation, and selected papers, see the web site at:For additional information, including model setup files, color brochure, users guide, technical documentation, and selected papers, see the web site at: Concluding Comments