CCC 2007-08 Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
Advertisements

Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
Performance Management Review FAQs
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Division Action Plans in Student Affairs Putting Student Learning First.
System Office Performance Management
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Mission Statement, Management Philosophy Goals and Objectives
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
System Office Performance Management
Application Streamlining Initiative Kickoff Meeting August 23, 2011.
Proposal Training.  What is Budgeting by Priorities?  How do I participate?  How do I write my proposals? ◦ Narrative Requirements ◦ Mechanics.
SOAR – Preparing for Launch Task Force Information January 2015.
INTRODUCTION Performance management is a relatively new concept to the field of management.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
NAVIGATING THE WATERS: USING ASSESSMENT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE Amy Harper, Area Coordinator, Fordham University Greer Jason, PhD, Assistant Dean of Students,
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
SOAR – Preparing for Launch Author Information January 2015.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Creating a Learning Community Vision
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Opening Activity  Welcome!  Sit at a table that represents an area on which you would like to talk with others about  As you sit at your table, waiting.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Middle & High Dept. Chair Meeting 2/14/12 Session Objectives: Common Core/Essential Standards Updates Increase understanding about New Course Codes Development.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Responsibility Centered Management APAC Presentation August 26, 2013 Jim Florian, AVP Provost Office.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Academic Program Review
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
General Education Assessment
My UI Career Process improvement for more meaningful and
My Performance Journey
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting
SACSCOC Response to March Monitoring Report
Presentation transcript:

CCC Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08

The “Big” Planning & Assessment Picture – Why do Wrap Up? Continuous Improvement

Assessing the CCC Planning Process Striving for Continuous Improvement Objectives 1)Divisions/Departments will better understand the planning process 2)The planning template will serve as a tool that helps us understand how priorities connect to activities, and activities connect to outcomes, and outcomes connect to improvement Assessment Activity Provide Wrap-Up sessions with Departments & Divisions to gather data/feedback Consider the Results Organize our findings from the Wrap Up sessions in order to report out and provide some recommendations based on these data Share the Results Report out to the college community with regard to our findings and recommendations Goal CCC will develop a meaningful and useful planning process that connects planning to mission, goals, and resources. Revisit and Revise The college will make adjustments where needed; incorporate new understanding; and, expand new ideas based on assessment of the planning process

The “Wrap Up” Charge Assist Departments and Divisions with the completion of their planning templates Assess the planning process Report back to the Planning Committee and Executive Team regarding Wrap Up findings and provide some recommendations for the planning process

Assist Divisions/Departments with the Wrap Up of Planning Methodology – Review departmental planning templates and provide feedback with regard to content and next steps. – Provide three guiding questions to assist Departments with the completion of the measuring and documenting of “Actual Outcomes” on the Planning Template. – Gather information about the planning process by asking Departments to identify “Successes” “Learning” and “Things To Do Differently”. Goal: Meet with every Department and/or Division by the end of May 2008 for “wrap up” activity.

Examples of Wrap Up Tools (single click to open entire document)

What Happened? We met with 40 groups representing Departments and/or Divisions across the College. Feedback regarding planning templates was provided at each meeting. Questions, answers and discussion took place regarding template format, definition of terms, understanding of the process and next steps. Data regarding “successes,” “learning” and “do differently” was collected and categorized.

What We Heard Some Themes That Emerged The Template as a Tool “Document is difficult to understand what is needed” “New template makes sense and is helpful” Clarification of language is needed Usability of the template as a Word document is challenging Enables departments to connect institutional, divisional and departmental priorities Demonstrates the importance of departmental ownership and accountability The Template as a Tool “Document is difficult to understand what is needed” “New template makes sense and is helpful” Clarification of language is needed Usability of the template as a Word document is challenging Enables departments to connect institutional, divisional and departmental priorities Demonstrates the importance of departmental ownership and accountability Teamwork and Communication Departments would like more help and training from their Deans PT Faculty felt more involved with this process We realized more and better communication within Departments The process served as team building “It’s OK to keep asking questions until it makes sense to a lot of people.” Teamwork and Communication Departments would like more help and training from their Deans PT Faculty felt more involved with this process We realized more and better communication within Departments The process served as team building “It’s OK to keep asking questions until it makes sense to a lot of people.” The Planning Process “Open process – every voice heard and welcome” Time consuming Overwhelming Makes sense Instills a sense of pride in accomplishments Encourages creativity and dialogue Need on-going support and guidance The Planning Process “Open process – every voice heard and welcome” Time consuming Overwhelming Makes sense Instills a sense of pride in accomplishments Encourages creativity and dialogue Need on-going support and guidance

What We Heard – Part II Successes, Learning and Do Differently (single click for full document)

What We (The Wrappers) Have Learned The College has realized benefits of the planning process that will serve us well in the future: – There is a greater sense of unity and shared purpose – There is greater alignment of Targeted Tasks with Strategic Priorities and departments/division now see how they “fit” – There is greater communication taking place up/down and across the institution Many departments and divisions have been very engaged in the planning process this year…. some have not. Some of us really like the template as is… some of us really don’t. Some of us really like the process of planning….some of us really don’t. Some of us are beginning to understand the importance of strategic planning & assessment… some of us remain unclear about this.

Recommendations: As Submitted by Departments/Divisions Involve PT, FT, and ACE as much as possible. Deans to provide feedback and training to department chairs Deans to provide feedback more regularly. Develop both qualitative and quantitative targets. Use the planning document as an organizational and team- building tool. Be flexible enough to respond to changing student needs.

Based On What We’ve Heard and Learned… Our Recommendations Are: Revise the Planning Template – Use language that is more easily understood – Provide definition for each of the planning template columns – i.e., activities, target, measures & outcomes – Provide instructions and examples in each of the planning template columns – Improve upon the “performance” of the planning template document – Reconsider the use of color coding in the planning template

Recommendations Continued… Further Refine the Process – Provide “ramping up” assistance and training to Departments/Divisions before they begin their planning for – Establish benchmarks in the planning timeline that allow for self check and feedback – Better connect Deans with Departments for planning – Create time for Departmental/Divisional in depth dialogue and planning – not during In Service week – Continue to educate the college community about “why” planning and assessment is important and provide assistance with the “how”

Remarks From the Wrappers Meeting with CCC departments and divisions has been a great privilege and pleasure. Based on our findings, we believe that as a result of the planning process, the college community has achieved a greater awareness of planning and assessment and has the ability to better: Prioritize institutional, divisional and departmental activities Begin to connect planning and budgeting Communicate and help determine the direction we go as a college Align divisional and departmental activities with institutional priorities Plan for, carryout, measure and achieve SMART outcomes that fulfill our mission