Describe the sit ins. Explain the effects of the sit ins.

ACTIVITY 1 Create a mind map –‘Events of the Sit Ins’ –With 6 branches

Despite.. –Supreme Court decisions –Protests –Civil Rights Act 1957 Segregation was still common in the Southern States

We will not hate you yet we will not obey your evil laws. We shall wear you down with our capacity to suffer. Martin Luther King & organisers of the civil rights campaign decided to use more non-violent, civil disobedience protests to increase pressure for change Not one hair of one head of one person should be harmed.

In Greensboro, North Carolina Black people had to stay out of White-owned restaurants 1st February Black students (The Greensboro Four) sat at the ‘whites only’ lunch counter at Woolworth's When they sat down they faced a sign on the wall…. Lunch Counter No Niggers Served Here

Ezell Blair Jnr, David Richmond, Franklin McCain and Joseph McNeil White lady on the left arrived at the counter for lunch but refused to sit down with African Americans so she left. The Greensboro Four

The Greenboro Four… Tried to order food but their order was refused Were asked to move but refused and stayed till closing time Expected to be arrested, beaten or even worse but they were not!

Next day (2 nd Feb) they returned with another 80 black and white students The students ‘sat in’ all day despite insults and attacks By 4 th Feb so much chaos had been created that the restaurant in Woolworth’s was forced to close

The idea caught on and spread across southern states –Sit-ins protested about segregated swimming pools, libraries, transport facilities, museums, art galleries, parks and beaches

By the end of 1960, protesters had taken part in the sit-ins

Non-violent protest was met by white violence TV viewers across US saw peaceful students being insulted, beaten and dragged off to jail Another slogan was heard from black protesters - ‘Fill the jails’ Why? Jails in police stations reached bursting point and courts could not cope with the numbers of students breaking state law, something would have to be done Fill the Jails!

Result of the Sit-Ins Restaurants could not afford the bad publicity and loss of business –Some simply closed to avoid dealing with the issue By July 1960 segregated lunch counters had disappeared from 100 cities across America Non-violent direct action and national TV coverage was forcing change

How effective were the Sit-Ins? VERY Showed young Blacks they could make a difference Whites were forced through the media to take notice of the ‘race issue’ Showed non-violent protest worked Showed MLK that black students could play crucial role in civil rights movement Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was formed LIMITED  Only brought limited change in towns and cities  Segregation and discrimination still existed in southern States

Source A Some Civil Rights workers believed that the sit-ins showed students that they could take action themselves. Young black people realised that they could make a difference to Civil Rights by winning the support of both black and white Americans. However, sit-ins only achieved limited success in some of the towns and cities where the protests were used. Much more needed to be done to improve Civil Rights. The very act of protesting meant the students believed they could make a difference. When they “sat in” these young people practiced non- violence, they dressed in their best clothes and they studied books. This helped to encourage black community support and won the respect and even admiration of some white Americans. However, the sit-ins only enjoyed success in a few Southern states. In the Deep South, white Americans refused to desegregate and the protestors faced resistance from the white authorities. Source B Compare the views in Sources A and B about the success of the sit-ins? (4)