Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Master Teacher Academy June 21-25, 2010
Advertisements

Welcome! Master Teacher Academy June 15-19, 2009 Funded by South Dakota Department of Education Enhancing Education Through Technology Program.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PROJECT INTEGRATE END OF YEAR SUMMARY AUGUST 4, 2011.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Q UARTERLY P ROFESSIONAL D EVELOPMENT Integrated Middle School Science Partnership Date October 11, 2014.
Project RACE: Rigorous Academic Curriculum for Everyone.
Big6™ - Information Skills For Student Achievement
ESA Region 2 April st Century Skills: More Than Just Computers.
Title II D Sharing Session Wednesday, August 12 Partnering for 21 st Century Success Lead Agency: Brookings School District Partnering LEA: Castlewood.
40. Overcoming Barriers to Transformation Through System-Wide Leadership Dr. Carol Johnson, Superintendent Central Dauphin School District.
Purpose of the Project The purpose of the project was to create an online professional learning network (PLN), to support middle school math/science teachers.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Leading Innovative Teaching & Learning in the 21 st Century Fostering innovation and excellence in teaching within an accountability environment Hug High.
School Partnerships K-12 Schools as Partners Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy Office of Professional Field Services March 6, 2012.
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
21 st Century Skills/ Technology Data to Support.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Donna Bryant and Mary Beth Singleton Education Technology Resource Teachers.
Innovative Teaching and Learning MOVING FROM THEORY TO ACTION 6 th June 2012.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
St. Cloud Partnership in Mathematics Grant Presented by: Jona Deavel, Math Coach/7-8 th Grade Math Teacher and Jenny Merriam, Grant Coordinator.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
TIES E2T2 Grant Project Technology Integrationist Community of Learning (TICL)
Ipod Project Welcome Back Session September 27, :30- 4:30 PM (SEA # NA–Credit) Lenoir County Public Schools Preparing all students to be competitive.
Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka.
Big6 Overview Big6™ Trainers Program McDowell County Schools.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
An Introduction for CMS Teachers and Staff. Agenda Agenda: Making the case for Information Literacy What is BIG6 ™ ? Why Big6? Big6 Step-by-Step Big6.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Light the Fire of Peer Coaching in Your School Ann Lumm Pam Gaviña Rene Castaneda Shelee King George.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
THE ROLES OF THE MEDIA SPECIALIST Lisa White A Media Specialist at a Glance… All images from Microsoft Office Clip Art.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Creative Classroom Collaboratives (C 3 ): Research Update December 1, 2011 Sponsored B y: Eastern Suffolk BOCES Presented By: Susanne Hartnett.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Kefira Philippe – Librarian Amy Wharton – Assistant Principal.
Ipod Project Initial Overview Training February 15, :30-5:30 PM (SEA #11 – 309 – Academic) Lenoir County Public Schools.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.

Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Professional Learning Project Update: Winter 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
SURN PRINCIPALS’ ACADEMY W.W.ROBINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MELISSA L FOLTZ, PRINCIPAL APRIL 22, 2015.
San Rafael City Schools Board Meeting January I NTEGRATING T ECHNOLOGY E NGINEERING A ND M ATH /S CIENCE.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting Leadership Session
Presentation transcript:

Master Teacher Academy East Dakota Educational Cooperative Vickie Venhuizen & Janeen Outka

Overview of Project What were the goals and objectives of your project? What activities helped you achieve project goals and objectives? Evaluation What data was collected? What tools and processes did you use to collect the data? What were the measurable results? Synopsis What success did you have with this project? What were your major challenges and how did you meet those? What did you learn from this project? What products were created as a result of your project? (i.e. units, wikis, websites etc.) What advice would you have for future project leaders?

Participants 66 completed 2010 MTA cohort 70 completed 2011 MTA cohort 31 administrators and ESA staff participated in Balanced Leadership

MTA Goals Student Achievement Goal #1: Student Achievement will increase by 1% for the schools participating in the June 2010 Master Teacher Academy based upon the Dakota STEP test from the spring of 2010 to the spring of GOAL PARTIALLY MET Reading scores in participating MTA schools decreased by 1% for all grades, but increased by 1% for grades Students in MTA schools performed 4% better than the State Average for all grades, and 1% better than the state average for grades Math scores in participating MTA schools decreased by 2% for all grades, but increased by 2% for grades Students in MTA schools performed 4% better than the State Average for all grades, and 2% better than the state average for grades Science scores were unavailable at the time of this report. Reading – All Grades Reading – Grades 9-12Math – All GradesMath – Grades 9-12 Science – All Grades Science – Grades Average of MTA Schools 20%21%30%29%17%19%30%28%23%31% STATE 23%25%30% 23% 31%30%27%32%

MTA Goals Objective 1: 60% of the MTA grant participants will indicate increased awareness of higher order thinking skills through communication as evidenced by classroom visits, coaching notes and documented responses to the on-line collaborative community questions. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED Based upon online collaborative community responses, comments, and classroom visits, MTA participants indicated an increased awareness of higher order thinking skills as they relate to teaching and learning.

MTA Goals SA Goal #2: Based on the Dakota Step data, the number of schools participating in the June 2010 MTA identified for school improvement will decrease by 1%. – GOAL EXCEEDED Of the 25 schools participating in the Master Teacher Academy, ten schools were identified for school improvement in 2010 (40%). Three of these schools made AYP and are no longer identified for improvement, a decrease of 12% School  Andes Central Elementary School (Level 1 – math, Level 5 Reading)  Brookings – Camelot Intermediate (Alert – Reading; Alert - Math)  Harrisburg Middle School (Alert- Math)  Madison Central Middle School (Level 1 - Reading)  Pierre – Georgia Morse Middle School (Level 3 – Reading)  Rapid City – Rapid Valley Elementary School (Alert - Math)  Sioux Falls Garfield (Level 3 – Math)  Sioux Falls Hawthorne (Level 1 – Math)  Sioux Falls Hayward (Level 3 - Math, Level 4 - Reading)  Sioux Falls Lincoln High School (Level 5 – Math)  Andes Central Elementary School (Level 2- math)  Brookings – Camelot (Level 1-reading)  Harrisburg Middle School (Alert-reading, Level 1-math)  Pierre – Georgia Morse Middle School (Alert- math, Level 4-reading)  Rapid City – Rapid Valley Elementary School (Alert-reading, Level 1-math)  Sioux Falls Hayward (Level 4-math, Level 4- reading)  Sioux Falls Lincoln High School (Level 5-math)

MTA Goals Objective 1: 60% of the MTA grant participants will increase the adoption of 21 st century tools in their instructional time as reported by teachers and measured by an SD DOE pre and post technology survey. GOAL EXCEEDED Based upon a pre- and post-survey, 38 teachers increased their use of 21 st century tools, 9 participants’ use of 21 st century tools remained the same and 8 people self reported that their comfort level decreased. Of the 49 teachers eligible to increase their use of 21 st century tools, 25 of the 49 (77.5%) increased their use of 21 st century tools.

MTA Goals Objective 2: 60% of June 2010 MTA participants will indicate an increased awareness in incorporating 21st century skills in teaching in a current context as evidenced by responses to the on-line collaborative community questions from the beginning to the end of the project. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED Based upon online collaborative community responses, comments, and classroom visits, MTA participants indicated an increased awareness in incorporating 21st century skills in teaching in a current context as evidenced by responses to the on-line collaborative community questions from the beginning to the end of the project.

MTA Goals PD Goal #1: 50% of the June 2010 MTA participating teachers will increase their level of technology integration by one stage as measured by SD DOE pre and post technology survey. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED - 25 of the 36 (69.4%) increased their comfort level. Objective#1: 90% of June 2010 MTA participants will indicate an increased use of 21st century skills in their Project Based Learning unit, as measured by a team designed survey answered during the coaching visit. OBJECTIVE NOT MET 24 of the 27 (88.8%) increased their use of 21 st century skills in classroom lessons.

MTA Goals PD Goal #2: 80% of participating administrators will increase their familiarity of 21st century skills as determined by SD DOE pre and post technology survey. GOAL NOT MET - 4 of the 13 (30.7%) increased their familiarity of 21st century skills. Objective 1: 60% of the MTA grant participants will indicate increased awareness of administrative support for teaching 21st century skills as evidenced by classroom visits, and coaching notes. OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED - 63% (31 of 49)

MTA Goals PD Goal #3: 80% of participating MTA teachers will develop an increased awareness of the 21 st Century Framework in SD teachers as measured by the SD DOE pre and post technology survey. GOAL EXCEEDED- 35 of the 41 (85.3%) increased their awareness of the 21st Century Framework Objective #1: 80% of participating teachers will increase their understanding of the 21 st century skills and tools by participating in a 5 day MTA as measured by a pre and post survey. (MTA 2010) OBJECTIVE EXCEEDED- 40 of the 45 (88.8%) Objective #2: 80% of participating teachers will increase their understanding of the 21 st century skills and tools by participating in a 5 day MTA as measured by a pre and post survey. (MTA 2011) OBJECTIVE NOT MET (68.4%)

What activities helped you achieve project goals and objectives? District/School Inservices Coaching visits Sharing Sessions

Evaluation What data was collected? Survey data DSTEP scores Participant Reflections What tools and processes did you use to collect the data? State survey (members.k12.sd.us) Data collected on-site (Edmodo, Ning & paper) What were the measurable results? See goals/objectives report

Synopsis Successes Many (4,929 (+ Aug) teachers administrators have more accurate knowledge about 21 st century skills. 136 teachers have become teacher leaders within their schools in regards to 21 st century teaching and project based learning MTA participants shared the MTA information with colleagues, impacting a larger number of South Dakota teachers and administrators.

Synopsis Unanticipated Outcomes Twenty-seven teachers increased their confidence level in inquiry-based learning Twenty-two teachers increased their confidence level in reflective practices Participating teachers changed how the students are engaged in classroom activities - Twenty-seven teachers reported that they spent more time evaluating or defending their ideas or views Participating teachers increased the amount of time students spend solving real world problems. Participating administrators indicated a increased the amount of time students spend solving real world problems.

Synopsis Lessons learned Administrative professional development was a challenge as local financial issues take priority Advice Provide support for participants throughout the year/process – Keep in close contact with them Encourage the participants to network and learn from each other Start collecting data early & update throughout the year

Thanks!