1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to ITS Georgia 2005 Annual Meeting presented by Kenny Voorhies Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August 29,
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
DynusT (Dynamic Urban Systems in Transportation)
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Analytical Needs SEMCOG Travel Model Improvement Program Donnelly, Davidson, Binkowski & Arens 12-Dec-2011.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Operations Webinar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 28, 2006.
1 Guidance for Improvement of Transportation Systems Management and Operations.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Incorporating Management and Operations and the Congestion Management Process into Metropolitan Transportation Planning FHWA/FTA Webinar June 24, 2008.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Congestion Causes and Solutions. Traffic Congestion Characteristics Slower speeds Longer trip time Increased queues More vehicles.
AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT PHOENIX, AZ – APRIL 2013 SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT TONY KRATOFIL, P.E. MARK GEIB, P.E. STEVE.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
Using Real Time Transportation System Performance Measures to Fuel a Regional Congestion Management System Robert L. Bertini Portland State University.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
FHWA Perspectives on VII Pat Kennedy Road Weather Management Program Federal Highway Administration VII Weather Applications Workshop II June 21, 2006.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
1 Update on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) and Related Data Activities Wenjing Pu COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee Meeting May 26,
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
I-270/MD 355 Simulator: An Intelligent Online Traffic Management System Dr. Gang-Len Chang Nan Zou Xiaorong Lai University of Maryland Saed Rahwanji Maryland.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
A case–driven comparison of Freeway Performance Measurement Systems by Shailesh Deshpande.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Transportation Systems Management and Operations: Why It Matters Presenter Name Date AGENCY LOGO Photo: © Shutterstock.com/iofoto ( )
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Dr. Xuesong Zhou Kiel Ova Incorporating Reliability into Modeling Tools February 12, 2015.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Dr. Xuesong Zhou Kiel Ova Incorporating Reliability into Modeling Tools February 20, 2015 Source = portlandtribune.com.
Dr. Xuesong Zhou Kiel Ova Incorporating Reliability into Modeling Tools February 12, 2015 Source = portlandtribune.com.
August 10, 2010 Workshop #1 SW Region Madison Office.
TSMO Program Plan Development Roundtable
Incorporating Reliability into Modeling Tools
Project Overview – Phase 1
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Program Plan Development Roundtable December 13, 2016.
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O)
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
FHWA TSMO / SHRP2 Research
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
A STATE-WIDE ACTIVITY-BASED
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
MODULE 5: TSMO to Improve Reliability
Module 2: TSMO Strategies
Regional Operations Forum Setting the Stage
Presentation transcript:

1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement Dimension Challenges and Opportunities from a State DOT Perspective Subrat Mahapatra Maryland State Highway Administration

2 “why you implemented performance measures in the first place and what you get out of them…” as it relates to Maryland TSM&O/ Mobility/ Reliability Improvement efforts

3 Existing Business Processes at SHA have stable TSM&O components built-in at all levels across the agency SHA Recipient of FHWA SHRP2 L06 Implementation Assistance to “Organize for Reliability” – opportunity to review and refocus priorities CMM workshops facilitated TSM&O related conversations internally and externally. Outcome of the L06 project will be a SHA TSM&O Strategic / Implementation Plan

4 Develop TSM&O data business plan Develop and implement a travel time reliability monitoring program Develop modeling plan and tools for supporting TSM&O analysis Other related initiatives (e.g., WZPMA, Freight Fluidity) Level1 — Performed2 — Managed3 — Integrated4 — Optimized CriteriaSome outputs measured and reported—but not utilized Output data used regularly for after-action debriefings and improvements; data easily available and dashboarded Outcome measures identified (networks, modes, impacts) and routinely utilized for objective-based program improvements Performance measures reported internally for utilization and externally for accountability and program justification SHA Self Evaluation in the Performance Measurement Dimension

5 TSM&O as a program (similar to SHSP) Integrated freeways and arterial systems M&O Arterials Ops is the next big opportunity area Freight consideration and multi-modal aspects Performance Metrics that considers ICM, ramp metering and other strategies Performance metrics that compares traditional projects with TSM&O projects Risk/ Uncertainty analysis tools

6 Advanced data/performance measurement and analytics infrastructure is already in place  SHA Data Services  ATR/ HPMS/ Counts  Detector data  Signal data/ CCTV feeds  Asset data, Project data  UMD CATT/ RITIS/ VPP  Speed, Incidents, Workzones, Special Events, Weather, Transit etc.

7

8 SHA Policies, Programs and Projects focus on Annual User Cost Savings Outcome driven decisions – e.g CHART expansion to 24/7 operations

9 CHART Operations Incident Management – Annual User Cost Savings – Average Incident Duration Traveler Information Systems – # of CHART Controllable Cameras – # of Maryland 511 Calls Received Work zone Management Winter Weather Operations Special Event Management TIM Training

10 SHAs FOUR-STEP APPROACH SHAs FOUR-STEP APPROACH CAUSES OF UNRELIABILITY Poorly Timed Traffic Signals Inclement Weather Crashes Fluctuations in Demand Work Zones SHA developed a Reliability Roadmap in Summer 2014 Phased Approach to develop a comprehensive program that improves reliability of our system SHRP2 Projects (L38, L06, R11) help advance Roadmap task activities.

11 Web-based Solution Web-based Solution Performance Based Approach Performance Based Approach Increase Transparency Increase Transparency

12

13 Outer loop on Northwest of I-695 (from I-83, exit 24 to I-795, exit 19) Miles

14 PM Peak Hour (5:00-6:00 pm) BeforeAfter Use of probe speed data to understand the congestion and reliability of the transportation network.

15 Probe Data Analytics provide : – Travel Time & Reliability Analysis – Real-time & Historic Dashboards – User Delay Costs – Animated Historic maps – Region and state-wide Bottleneck Ranking – Performance Summary Tables – Graphics and Data Exports – Raw & aggregate Data Downloads Tools and Applications aid in – Identify problem areas (for project development) – Confirm existing project viability – Conduct before & after studies – Create system performance report-outs, and more

16 SHA is developing multi-resolution and time-dependent travel demand models for integrated planning and operations KEY FEATURES o Data Hub o Multi-resolution network o Statewide Model/ DTA o Corridor/ Sub-area AgBM/ DTA o ABM/ DTA Integration

Input & Output Measures 17 Business Processes Reliable Datasets Data Business Plan Systems and Technology Outcome based Performance Management for TSM&O Outcome based Performance Management for TSM&O Analytical Engines Contact Information: Subrat Mahapatra Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering Maryland State Highway Administration Phone: