Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Permitting Process Overview Alasdair McKellar PPC Compliance Officer Environment Agency.
Advertisements

GHG emissions from landfills for EPER reporting Ian Whitwell Pollution Inventory team Environment Agency of England & Wales.
Environmentally sound management of ship recycling- simple or complex? Roy Watkinson Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs UK Promoting Sustainable.
Industrial Pollution Control - Harmonization and Implementation in Bulgaria Slavitza Dobreva Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria Final Seminar.
Consolidation of he Environmental Monitoring System in Albania (CEMSA) An EU-funded project managed by the Delegation of the European Commission to Albania.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
Alex Radway Policy Advisor Process Industries Regulation.
Environmental Permitting Regulations Tom Fowler – Environment Officer
The Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory (SPRI) Bob Boyce - SEPA Senior Environmental Assessment Officer.
Action Plan to Enhance the Comparability of Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) in North America First published in 2002 Updated in 2005 Updated.
Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Integrated Control of Industrial and Chemical Substances in Cyprus Final Conference.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
Reconstruction of National Emission Inventory System (NEIS) > 3 rd UNECE TFEIP & EIONET Workshop, Cordoba, Spain Davor Vesligaj EKONERG, CROATIA.
1 NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS (NTUA) School of Chemical Engineering Unit of Environmental Science and Technology (UEST) Katherine Haralambous.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BY ENTERPRISES FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPING MONITORING GUIDELINES FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY IN EASTERN EUROPE, CAUCASUS.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Update on Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) CEC – Public Meeting of the NAPRTR Project November 11, 2014 Karen Mailhiot Environment.
Reporting to the EPRTR in the UK Alex Hole Assessment & Reporting Advisor.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
BULGARIAN APPROACH TO THE BAT IN THE IPPC PERMITTING BOYKO MALINOV MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER BULGARIA.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
The Contaminated Land Regulations – Consolidated Review 21 September 2005 Craig Edwards.
Environmental auditing
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
1 Permitting of industrial facilities in Croatia.
IPPC transposition and experience with its implementation in the Czech Republic ?? …!! AjPíPíSí ??
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
Managing data in our Pollution Inventory Alex Hole Assessment & Reporting Advisor.
Paul Leinster Director Environmental Protection. Overview Spearheads Regulatory & Charging Strategy Move towards Environmental Risk Based Regulation Integration.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Synergies in PRTR capacity-building activities Michael Stanley-Jones Environmental Information Management.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Capacity building for decision makers for small businesses regulation Monika P ř ibylová.
1 Pollutant Release & Transfer Registers The Canadian Government Experience National Workshop on PRTRs Santiago, Chilé - May 29, 2002.
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and Data Visualization PRTR Global Round-Table Session on Next Generation PRTRs Spain, November 24.
| Folie | Folie 2 Reporting according to pollution registers Experiences in Austria Mag. Daniela Wappel.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Group EIA 1: Screening for Annex 2 Both:- case-by-case - thresholds < 10% goes to EIA All Countries have problems with “Salami Slicing” Little Information.
International Context for PRTRs Jim Willis, Director UNEP Chemicals.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN An overview on SwissPRTR Pollutant.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
POLLUTANT RELEASE AND TRANSFER REGISTER IN THE NETHERLANDS Pieter van der Most.
Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTR) as tools to access environmental information May 2013.
IPPC Permit Procedure in the UK Kiev, 26 January 2011 Alex Radway Senior Advisor Environment Agency for England & Wales, United Kingdom.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
Mr. Nepimach Czech Ecological Institute
Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Reporting of priority substances in Norway
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
Quality aspects of EPER
Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
Presentation transcript:

Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of England & Wales (

Introduction The Environment Agency is the main competent authority for regulating large industrial activities in England and Wales Pollution Inventory established in a Pollutant Release and Transfer Register or PRTR. Not compliance check Rio Agenda 21, US Toxic Release Inventory, UK Chemical Release Inventory Records annual mass releases and transfers from the industrial activities that we regulate Other PRTRs in UK - not fully integrated yet

Objectives To satisfy the needs of stakeholders requiring information on releases to the environment (includes UNECE, EC, UK government, citizens, NGOs, industry). To do this we:  Provide data and information on releases to the environment and their possible impact in a scientifically valid and transparent way, with easy access, set in its proper context, to a general audience  Use the information to evaluate regulatory policies and the benefits of regulation  Provide feedback on environmental performance and contribute to industrial benchmarking  Collect data in a consistent and cost-effective way (proportionate to the objectives)

Principles  Mandatory requirement to report industrial releases for specified substances  Reporting requirements should be clear and open and should not be a back-door route for requiring additional monitoring  The best information to be provided without causing excessive burden  Industry consulted when changes are to be made  Operator responsible for providing information, not the regulator, ie self-monitoring  Include international PRTR requirements

Development of the Pollution Inventory Environmental issues Activities (sources) and locations Contextual information NOT just data Data (releases and transfers) Drivers include: National PI EPER/E-PRTR UNECE PRTR Coverage includes: -substance information -burden measures -risk-based information -site-specific commentary Coverage includes: -process industries: mainly IPPC -wastewater works -radionuclide sites Driven by legislation e.g. Aarhus, IPPC Public and stakeholder expectation

Scope  Most IPPC Annex 1 activities  Large wastewater treatment works  Sites with releases of radionuclides  Around 170 reportable substances or groups - multimedia  Reporting threshold set to capture 95% of emissions from the activities we regulate  releases below reporting threshold defined as ‘brt’  no release is defined as ‘not applicable’ (n/a)  Measured, calculated, estimated  Data collected, entered and verified locally; some centralised checking  Some commercial-in-confidence and national security issues

Air Wastewater treatment Land Off-site waste transfers Other disposal Sewer Water Reportable media Air

Activities reporting

Legal and institutional issues  Reporting mainly from activities permitted under IPPC  Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) Act and Regulations determines competent authorities and the activities required to report  Competent authority determines specific sites for permitting  Reporting requirements defined in Information Notices rather than in the permit itself - flexible  Notice issued every 3 years  Can change requirements without varying permit conditions  Pollution Inventory Advisory Group

Electronic reporting screen

Reporting guidance and tools  Concerns over lack of reporting  Assist by producing guidance and reporting tools:  recommend measurement techniques  MCERTS certification (  Operator Monitoring Assessment (OMA) scoring  define alternative calculation and estimation methods (emission factors, mass balance etc)  General and sector specific  Jointly funded working groups (industry and regulator)  Highlights most relevant substances, but operator has responsibility to report all relevant releases  Currently use of the guidance is not obligatory  Available from our website (

Guidance and tools - eg landfills  Landfill leachate estimator tool  Landfill gas emissions estimation tool - GasSim

Quality assurance and checking  26 Areas  Three levels of checking  Area Inspectors using site-specific knowledge  Centralised using trend analysis  Operators have opportunity to view and amend prior to publication  Some experience must be built up before QA methods can be fully developed

Public information - WIYBY  PI data published annually on website  ‘What’s in Your Backyard’ - WIYBY  Easily accessible by stakeholders  Downloadable  Maps  Comparisons  ‘Spotlight on industry’ report

Contextual information Substance information sheets

Burdens - Global Warming Potential for releases from activities we regulated in 2000 Contextual information

Lessons learnt  Monitoring not obligatory for PI  Legal clarity needed. What and by when?  Consult with industry  Guidance and tools - joint funding - consistency  Context  Regulation by information  Advisory Group with stakeholders  Highlight benefits to industry - public image