1. The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte

2. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To provide a high level of environmental protection for the environment as a whole To minimise the consumption of raw material and energy To simplify and strengthen the role of the Control Authorities

3. The IPPC Licensing System controls –Effluent discharge –Emissions to air –Waste management –Noise –Related activities from Specified Activities with

4. IPPC: Integrated stand for Individual balance of cost and benefit. All aspect in one permit. IPPC: Pollution is all that may be harmful to human health and to the quality of the environment. Include Energy consumption and waste production => BAT shall be use to prevent Pollution but also to conservation of energy and waste minimization IPPC: Prevention comes before control (can take more time) IPPC free interpretation !

5. Air Land/ soil Water Energy efficiency Raw materials Waste Generation Noise integrated approach Prevention of Accident

6. … and restoration of the site upon closure. integrated approach

7. Best Available Techniques (BAT) means... Best= Most effective and advanced Available = Commercially available and demonstrated Techniques = Technology and operating practices/management to reduce impact on the environment as a whole

8. ESTABLISHING Best Available Techniques (BAT) The ‘competent body’ / environmental regulator in Member States i.e. determined for specific installations according sector and local issues you will get different BATs in different places and different countries there is no ‘single’ BAT for a certain type of industrial activity

9. Issues considered in identifying BAT (a balanced judgment) Identification of BAT Costs and benefits of measure Achievable emissions Environmental impacts – air, land, water BREF’s Energy use Technical reliability Installation time

10. Use of BAT in IPPC IPPC Permit Emission limit value & other conditions Level of control achievable by BAT Other issues: - local environment - geographic location - technical characteristics EQS

11. IPPC Licensing applies to these sectors Energy Industries Production and Processing of Metals Mineral Industry Chemical Production Waste Management Other Activities (but excluding Nuclear) The Directive lists the activities covered by IPPC under 6 main headings and 31 sub-categories (Annex I) Total 56 industrial activities

12. “Other Activities” includes... Pulp, Paper, Timber Dyeing of Textiles Tanneries Slaughterhouses Food Processing Milk processing Disposal of dead Animals Intensive rearing of Poultry and Pigs Use of Solvents for surface treatment Manufacture of Carbon

13. Some categories include activities of all sizes e.g. Manufacture of Fertilisers Other categories have specified thresholds e.g. Slaughterhouses with a throughput exceeding 50 t/d Does IPPC apply to all sizes of enterprise?

14. What is a PER? An integrated database with emission data or pollutant releases associated from identified facilities which is accessible to the public EPER: European Pollutant Emission Register

15. IPPC Directive - Article15 (3) Article 15 (3) states:- “An inventory of the principal emissions and sources responsible shall be published every three years by the Commission on the basis of the data supplied by the Member States. …………………….”

16. PER - Commission Decision Commission Decision 2000/479/EC detailed the measures Member States must take to implement Article 15 (3) of the IPPC Directive.

17. Requirements The Decision requires Member States to supply data about IPPC facilities (every 3 years) under the following headings: Releases Time Pollutants (above a threshold) Sources Locations

18. Releases The report must include the direct releases to air and water as well as the indirect release by transfer to an off-site wastewater treatment plant; Releases to land or groundwater, transfers of waste and on-site transfers are not included..

19. Time The release year will make it possible to follow trends and analyse emission reductions as a result of the achievement of industrial sectors; The EPER has started in 2003 with a reporting frequency of 3 years.

20. Pollutants The emission data must be reported for a list of 50 pollutants (chemicals or groups of chemicals), of which 37 substances for air and 26 for water, Waste is excluded from the reporting obligations.

21. Sources The emissions of about 20,000 individual facilities covered by the IPPC Directive must be reported together with an identification code of the industrial sector, so that the data can be aggregated and compared for both sectors and countries.

23. Locations The site of the facility must be identified geographically, so the data can be used for modeling and calculations of the concentrations in ambient air

24. Objectives There are several objectives of a PER. Some the key ones being: provides data to aid governments in developing environmental policy; it is a public instrument for governments to monitor environmental policies; a tool to enhance public awareness of environmental pollution.

25. Benefits A PER can have several benefits: harmonises reporting requirements and avoids duplicate reporting by industry; provides additional information to prioritise enforcement of permit compliance; it enables facilities to compare their performance with similar facilities.

26. EU Goals The goals of the EPER (from the Commissions point of view) are related to different groups of users: Government Public Industry

27. Selected Pollutants The selection criteria for putting substances into Annex 3 (of the Decision) were based on the environmental significance of the pollutants and are as follows: considering the Annex III list of the Directive and making a differentiation between air & water; pollutants for which international reporting requirements already exist; having both individual chemicals and groups; including pollutants for both air and water.

28. Quality Quality Assurance: responsibility of Government & Reporting Industries; Quality Control: responsibility of Government. Quality of reported data is the accumulated result of the following aspects: Timeliness; Completeness; Uncertainty; Comparability; Consistency; and Transparency.

29. Determination Methodologies The EPER database indicates for each data set what methodology was used to determine the emission data. These are: M=measured using standardised or accepted methods; C=based on nationally orinternationally accepted estimation methods; E=based on non-standardised estimations or expert guesses

30. Timetable The timetable for the EPER, originally, was as follows: first reporting by Member States June 2003; second reporting by member states June 2006; after review a decision should be taken as to whether to move to annual reporting; from 2008 the Member States will be encouraged to report the annual data in December rather than June of the following year.

31. The “Future” of EPER After each reporting cycle the whole aspect of the EPER is to be reviewed. Possible changes (currently being accomplished) include: the reporting frequency may change; the contents of the list of pollutants and the thresholds may change; the facilities that have to report may be expanded beyond those covered by IPPC expansion of the scope of the EPER into a fully integrated PRTR

32. PER: Responsibilities There are 3 bodies with differing responsibilities associated with the functioning of the EPER: Industry (IPPC Processes); Government; The Commission (& the EEA).

33. Industry Functions Identify those substances which are in Annex 3 of the Decision which the plant emits above the thresholds in that Annex; Calculate the amount (kgs/year) released; Report to the to the competent authority in a timely manner.

34. Government Functions Identification of facilities with Annex I Activities; Identification of Source Categories & NOSE-P Codes; Collection of Data; Validation of Data (Quality Control); Submission of data to the Commission

35. Commission Functions Receipt of data; Consistency checking; Compilation of data; Dissemination of data; Issuing of Guidance; Review of methodology.

36. Examples of Situations with Various Sites, Facilities and Activities

37. Example 1

38. Releases to Water

39. Releases to Air

40. Example 2

41. Releases to Water

42. Releases to Water - Combined Facilities (exception- ref service contract)

43. Releases to Air

44. Example Bulgaria RIEW: Regional Inspectorate for Environment and Water MOEW: Ministry of Environment and Water ExEA: Executive Environment Agency; EEA: European Environment Agency

45. I think you have a problem EPER “Industry and government should co-operate to get EPER moving into the right direction”