Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

Performance Appraisal Systems
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008
Waiver Day May 15, Today’s presentation would not be possible without the hard work of the Evaluation Committee and Mad River staff. ◦ Cristi Fields.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Peninsula School District
Professional Performance Process OPD 863 – Using the Rubric Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
1 Sheffield Hallam University Graduate Diploma in Youth Work Placement Information.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Prince William County Schools Professional Performance Process
Implementing post-290 EVALUATION: Remediating Inadequate Performance of Teachers 1 The Hungerford Law Firm April 13, 2015.
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS 1 Online Performance Management System Overview: BTU Employees November 2013.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student Achievement.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 2014 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
O UR S CHOOLS E VALUATION P ROCESS Brad, Chad, Holly, Katie, Lily, and Pat.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS
Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
PAS… The Second & Third Observation Cycles. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation System
Certified Evaluation Orientation
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation

2 Today’s Outcomes Participants will: Understand the evaluation timeline. Continue to practice classroom observation. Be able to use a collection of evidence to write a high-quality Mid-Year Report and Summative Evaluation Report.

3 Evaluation Timeline Probationary Professional Educator Continuing Contract Professional Educator Part-time Professional Educator

4 Evaluation Timeline and Calendar It is the educational leader’s responsibility annually to inform all professional educators within 30 days of beginning of contract of how they will be supervised and evaluated. They must ensure that at least the minimum requirements of the professional performance process are met for every employee.

5 Probationary Professional Educator: Meets or Exceeds Standard(s) SeptemberProfessional Growth Plan Conference (within 30 days of contract date) September-November 1Minimum of one informal observation November 1Progress Check Conference based on at least one informal observation and all other available evidence December 151 st formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) January 1Mid-Year Report due in DHR February 15Professional Growth Plan review and refinement March 52 nd formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) March 15Summative Evaluation Report due in DHR June 15Professional Growth Plan Review Conference held and documented Proposed refinements are in red.

6 Probationary Professional Educator: Does Not Meet Standard(s) SeptemberProfessional Growth Plan Conference (within 30 days of contract date) September-November 1Minimum of one informal observation November 1Progress Check Conference based on at least one informal observation and all other available evidence Placement on Professional Improvement Plan (may be done at any time), frequency and types of interventions to be identified December 151 st formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) January 1Mid-Year Report due in DHR February 12 nd formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) Professional Growth Plan review and refinement February 8Summative Evaluation Report due in DHR June 15Professional Growth Plan Review Conference held and documented

7 Continuing Contract Professional Educator: Meets or Exceeds Standard(s) Formal Evaluation Year SeptemberProfessional Growth Plan Conference (within 30 days of contract date) September – MayOngoing informal observations with reflective conferences February 15Professional Growth Plan review and refinement Mid-Year Conference (documented, but no report necessary) May 1Formal observation completed (to include pre- and post- observation conferences) May 10Summative Evaluation Report due in DHR June 15Professional Growth Plan Review Conference held and documented (unless combined with Summative Evaluation Conference)

8 Continuing Contract Professional Educator: Does Not Meet Standard(s) SeptemberProfessional Growth Plan Conference (within 30 days of contract date) September – November 1Minimum of one informal observation November 1Progress Check Conference based on at least one informal observation and all other available evidence Placement on Professional Improvement Plan (may be done at any time), frequency and types of interventions to be identified February 11 st formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) February 8Mid-Year Report due in DHR February 15Professional Growth Plan review and refinement May 12 nd formal observation completed (to include pre- and post-observation conferences) May 10Summative Evaluation Report due in DHR June 15Professional Growth Plan Review Conference held and documented (unless combined with Summative Evaluation Conference)

9 Continuing Contract Professional Educator: Meets or Exceeds Standard(s) Formative Evaluation Years SeptemberProfessional Growth Plan Conference (within 30 days of contract date) September – JuneOngoing informal observations with reflective conferences Professional Growth Plan review and refinement June 15Professional Growth Plan Review Conference held and documented See page of PPP Handbook for Professional Educators for additional information regarding evaluation and appeal process.

10 Collection of Evidence CASE STUDY Donald Mills 7 th Grade Language Arts General Education and ELL Students

11 Professional Growth Plan (PPP-1) Who is Donald Mills? What are the key points to discuss in this initial PGP conference with Donald?

12 1 st Informal Observation (PPP-4) Activity - Read the Observation Report. What questions would you have asked Mr. Mills? What would your next steps be?

13 Data Collection Document C Read page 1 of the Data Collection Document C. What are some other possible sources of evidence?

14 1 st Formal Observation What will be your focus in Donald’s Pre-observation Conference? What would you ask him to bring to the conference? What questions would you ask him? Post-Observation Conference What would be your next steps?

15 Professional Improvement Plan Created collaboratively Can be done at anytime of the year A PIP must be done for each “Does Not Meet Standard” A copy is attached to the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Reports

16 Mid-Year Report Activity Read through pages 1-2 of the PIP, the 2 nd and 3 rd Informal Observations, and page 2 of the Data Collection Document C. Read the Commendations/Recommendations section of Donald’s Mid-Year Report. What else might you have included?

17 Activity You will do the 2nd formal observation of Donald Mills using the Observation Report (PPP-4) While you watch the video, complete the Observation Report (PPP-4)

18 Writing a Summative Evaluation Report Using the Collection of Evidence Read the last page of the PIP and the rest of the Data Collection Document C. Based on the Collection of Evidence on Donald: 1. Write the Summary Statement for Planning, Delivery, and Assessment of Instruction. 2. Discuss the fate of Donald and make your recommendation for his contract status on the 2 nd page of the Summative Evaluation.