Welcome to the LEAP Mid-Year Conversation Training! 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Mentoring New Educators
Mid-Year Conversations Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation
Make It Happen Leadership in Teaching - March 20, 2013.
lkfjasl;kfjal;sdkfja;lsdkfj “Why” Mid-Year Conversations? Grounding in the School Leadership Framework Goals for Mid-Year Conversations Support for Mid-Year.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
Preparing for End of Year (April 2013). School leaders will: Practice scoring Professionalism Understand the EOY Data Reports Understand available support.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
2014 External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
LEAP Logistics. Essential Questions How does LEAP connect with other DPS initiatives? What instruments will be used during the LEAP pilot?
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
PREPARING FOR LEAP END-OF-YEAR CONVERSATIONS April 2015.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Learning Power Institute
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Data Driven Instruction for Common Core Learning
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Standards for the 21st Century Learner Lesson Plan Database
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Educator Effectiveness Update September Training Outcomes Review the WPSD Evaluation System – Overall Focus – New & Modified Components – System.
COLLABORATION MODULE #5 Planning Using Goals And Milestones An online module developed by Pivot Learning Partners for the West Contra Costa Unified School.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Ipod Project Welcome Back Session September 27, :30- 4:30 PM (SEA # NA–Credit) Lenoir County Public Schools Preparing all students to be competitive.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
LEAP in School Staff. Training Objectives  Understand the changes to LEAP for  Have questions answered.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Principal Level Meetings April 16/17, 2012 Professional Performance Process.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
July 2012 Session 12: LEAP Logistics. Essential Questions 2 What is the plan for LEAP in and how can I support the implementation? What are the.
Professional Learning: NYC Performance Task Norming Workshop
© 2014, KDE and KLA. All rights reserved. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND SELF-REFLECTION.
SLO Check-in December 2015 SLOs in LEAP Midyear Conversations.
Colorado RtI Fidelity of Implementation Rubrics
MA DSAC Collaboration Institute for Special and General Education Leaders Session 4: February 28, 2012 Action Planning.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Welcome to the Consumer Centered Family Consultation Implementation Webinar Hosted by: The Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
DIBELS Progress Monitoring Arbuckle Staff Training 2012.
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Getting Started with MMD
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the LEAP Mid-Year Conversation Training! 1

1. Using the professionalism rubric, score scenario 1 (Mickey Mouse) on page 2 of the purple “Mid-Year Conversation Scenarios” handout. 2. Discuss your responses with someone at your table. 3. Then, discuss which LEAD indicators relate to giving effective feedback to teachers (e.g., HRL1)? At Your Table…

Instructional Superintendents / Executive Directors HR School PartnersLEAP Staff Implement School Leadership Framework: HRL 1 HRL 2 IL 1 OL CEL 2 Provide guidance and support around: Difficult conversations Probationary decision making Revised Professionalism rubric SPS results Schoolnet Introductions 3

FRAMING TODAY’S SESSION Preparing for (and practicing) mid- year conversations with teachers 1. Explaining new tools Mid-Year Conversations Guide Revised Professionalism Rubric SPS Results Guidance 2. Practicing conversations with our colleagues Scenarios OR real examples from your building 3. Individual or school team planning team

If school leaders select, develop, and retain high performing teachers, and provide their teachers with ongoing feedback and supports, then teachers will be more effective at providing standards-based instruction and support to students and student performance will improve. 5

Mid-Year Conversations Will Include 6 Professional Growth Plans Framework-Aligned Professional Learning Mid-Year & End-of- Year Conversations Feedback Conversations Observations Scores Professionalism Ratings Student Perception Data School Measures State Measures Student Learning Objectives

LEAD Framework 7

Now – February – Teachers self-assess Professionalism and enter scores in Schoolnet – Once teachers finalize scores, school leaders may view in Schoolnet – OPTIONAL: Utilize Professionalism Google Doc to capture evidence Dec – Feb – Host Mid-Year Conversations – Start with teachers without SPS Jan 6 – Student Perception Survey Results available Early Jan – Probationary Guidance data tool available Jan – Pre-budget meetings with HRSP Feb 28 – Last day to host Mid-Year Conversations Mid-Year LEAP Timeline 8

1.School leaders schedule Mid-Year Conversations with teachers 2.Teachers self-assess and enter scores on Professionalism 3.School leaders assess teachers on Professionalism 4.Conduct Mid-Year Conversation “No surprises” check-in Opportunity to provide feedback Professionalism scores NOT counted toward the final LEAP score 5.Adjust Professionalism scores as necessary Mid-Year Conversation Process 9

With an elbow partner or your school team: Take 10 minutes to walk through: -MYC Guide -Professionalism Rubric -SPS Primer Put a star next to things you will use to prepare for and/or execute conversations Mid-Year Conversation Tools 10

Mid-Year Conversation Guide 11

Revised based on feedback from the field Mirrors observation rubric by providing an evidence guide Integrates icons to show which indicators reflect key instructional values and practices (ELLs, CCSS, 21 st century skills, etc.) Professionalism Rubric 12

SPS Report Guide 13

Score Scenarios 1 and 2 on professionalism (at your table) At your table, discuss your scores and come to consensus Choose scenario from page or real school scenario (30 sec) Choose roles (duo or triad) (30 sec) – A: Leader – B: Teacher – C: Observer (optional) Role Play (3 min) Give ‘A’ feedback (2 min) (1 thing you did well…1 thing to try next time) Repeat Role Play incorporating feedback (2 min) Switch 14 Practice

-Option 1: calendar/comms plan -Option 2: role play -Option 3: data/tool review Planning Time Please complete your EXIT TICKET online ASAP

 Conduct MYC by Feb 28  Teachers self-rate on professionalism  SPS and PDG available in early Jan  Schedule MYC with each teacher on your caseload  Share relevant information from today with your staff  Professionalism Rubric  Guidance for teachers so they can prepare  leap.dpsk12.org and  Follow up with your IS/ED and HRSP as needed  Give us feedback (short survey online) 16 Next Steps