Pragmatics. Pragmatics n Pragmatics studies how human communication functions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Advertisements

Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication. Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication n Overstatement: No one understands me. A pig wouldn’t eat this food.
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.
Language and communication What is language? How do we communicate? Pragmatic principles Common ground.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
Topic 10: conversational implicature Introduction to Semantics.
The Cooperative Principle
EL1101E WEEK 10: PRAGMATICS Group members: Elaine Ong Ong Min Thakshayeni Skanthakumar Jeannie Poon.
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 7 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Matakuliah: G0922/Introduction to Linguistics Tahun: 2008 Session 9 Semantic 2.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.
FBMK UPM B. A. (English Language) /BBI 3213 (Speech Communication) BBI 3213 (Speech Communication) CREDITS: 3 (3+0) LECTURER: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mohd.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Speech Acts & Language Functions Pragmatics Not only language structure is rule governed – language use is, too Rules of language use are social: ”Is saying.
Chapter Seven Pragmatics
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
Theories of Discourse and Dialogue. Discourse Any set of connected sentences This set of sentences gives context to the discourse Some language phenomena.
Various Definitions of Pragmatics. Morristhe study of the relations of signs to interpreters (1938) deals with the origin, uses, and effects of signs.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
+ 1. Pragmatics. - What is pragmatics? - Context 2. Speech acts. - direct speech acts - indirect speech acts.
PRAGMATICS A: I have a fourteen year old son B: Well that's all right
Phil 148 Chapter 2B. Speech Act Rules 1. Must the speaker use any special words or formulae to perform the speech act? 2. Must the (a) speaker or (b)
Chapter 8 Pragmatics Contents 8.1 Some basic notions 8.2 Speech act theory 8.3 Principle of conversation.
1 Verbal Verbal 4: Inter-Act, 13 th Edition 4: Inter-Act, 13 th Edition.
FACULTY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE G. TOGIA SECTION ΠΗ-Ω 20/10/2015 Introduction to linguistics II.
Pragmatics.
INTRODUCTION TO PRAGMATICS the study of language use the study of linguistic phenomena from the point of view of their usage properties and processes (Verschueren,
Dr. Katie Welch LING  Heretofore, we have talked about the form of language  But, this is only half the story.  We must also consider the.
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes Fogelin: Ch. 1 Fall Term 2006 North Central College Dr. Sally Fowler.
SEMANTICS VS PRAGMATICS Semantics is the study of the relationships between linguistic forms and entities in the world; that is how words literally connect.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The terminology and concepts of semantics, pragmatics and discourse.
Welcome Back, Folks! We’re travelling to a littele bit far-end of Language in Use Studies EAA remains your faithful companion.
UNIT 2 - IMPLICATURE.
ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.
The more we study conversation or any kind of discourse, the more we realize that it is not so much what the sentences literally mean that matters, as.
Lecture 10 Semantics Sentence Interpretation. The positioning of words and phrases in syntactic structure helps determine the meaning of the entire sentence.
Can a blind person guess the state of mind of someone they are talking with without seeing them? SAK-WERNICKA, JOLANTA. "EXPLORING THEORY OF MIND USE IN.
Why languages differ: Variation in the conventionalization of constraints on inference By: Randy J. LaPolla City University of Hong Kong Presented by:
What does the speaker mean when s/he utters a sentence? Berg (1993): “What we understand from an utterance could never be just the literal meaning of the.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
Implicature. I. Definition The term “Implicature” accounts for what a speaker can imply, suggest or mean, as distinct from what the speaker literally.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
7 Pragmatics Definition of pragmatics Pragmatics vs. semantics Context
عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
SEMANTICS VS PRAGMATICS
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE:
Introduction to Linguistics
The Cooperative Principle
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
Pragmatics.
The Cooperative Principle
RELEVANCE THEORY Group Members Sana saif Huma Wazir Junaid Ahmed
Pragmatics Predmetni nastavnik: doc. dr Valentna Boskovic Markovic
Direct and indirect speech acts
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

Pragmatics

Pragmatics n Pragmatics studies how human communication functions.

Pragmatics n The problem is: how does this process of human interaction function? –And n What is successful linguistic communication

Pragmatics n The Message Model of Communication

Pragmatics –Message is encoded by speaker –Message is carried through sounds –Message is decoded by hearer

Pragmatics n The Message Model of Communication –Message is encoded by speaker –Message is carried through sounds –Message is decoded by hearer n Problems with the message model:

Pragmatics n The Message Model of Communication –Message is encoded by speaker –Message is carried through sounds –Message is decoded by hearer n Problems with the message model: –Does not immediately answer the problem of ambiguity.

Pragmatics n The Message Model of Communication –Message is encoded by speaker –Message is carried through sounds –Message is decoded by hearer n Problems with the message model: –Does not immediately answer the problem of ambiguity. –Thus, it is dependent on contextual cues. n Flying planes can be dangerous.

Pragmatics –The underdetermination of reference: n An utterance can refer to more than one thing: “A shrewd politician” could mean Winston Churchil or Richard Nixon or any number of other people. –The underdetermination of communicative intent n I’ll be there tonight –a promise –a predicion –or a threat

Pragmatics –Nonliterally n Sarcasm, metaphor –Oh, that’s just great –Indirection n We sometimes mean to communicate more than our sentences mean. –My car has a flat tire –(to the gas station attendant) –(to the investigating officer)

Pragmatics –Non-communicative acts

Pragmatics n Speech acts of social significance (institutional acts): –Baptism (the baby cannot decode the message, although he is the one whose social status is changed.) –Perlocutionary acts: attemtps to impress, deceive or persuade which may not do so, since the hearer is expecting them.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach

Pragmatics –Linguistic communication is successful if the hearer recognizes the speaker’s communicative intention. Linguistic communication works because the speaker and hearer share a system of inferential strategies leading from the utterances of an expression to the hearers recognition of the speaker’s communicative intent.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –The Inferential Approach presumes the following: –Linguistic Presumption (LP): it is assumed that the hearer can determine meaning. –Communicative Presumtion (CP): it is assumed that the speaker is speaking to someone with some intent

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Presumption of Literalness (PL): it is assumed that the speaker means what he says

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Presumption of Literalness (PL): it is assumed that the speaker means what he says –Conversational Presumptions (ConPs)

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Presumption of Literalness (PL): it is assumed that the speaker means what he says –Conversational Presumptions (ConPs) n Relevance - remarks are relevant n Sincerity - speakers is being sincere n Truthfulness - speakers is attempting to say something true n Quantity - there is enough information n Quality - speaker has adequate info.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Direct Strategy to Communication

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Direct Strategy to Communication n Step 1 - Utterance act, the hearer recognizes what the speaker has uttered.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Direct Strategy to Communication n Step 1 - Utterance act, the hearer recognizes what the speaker has uttered. n Step 2 - Operative meaning, the hearer recognizes which meaning of the expression is intended.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Direct Strategy to Communication n Step 1 - Utterance act, the hearer recognizes what the speaker has uttered. n Step 2 - Operative meaning, the hearer recognizes which meaning of the expression is intended. n Step 3 - Speaker reference, the hearer recognizes what the speaker is referring to.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Direct Strategy to Communication n Step 4 - Direct, the hearer recognizes what the speaker is intending to communicate directly

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Literal Strategy

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Literal Strategy n Step 5 - Contextual appropriateness, the hearer recognizes that it would be contextually appropriate for the speaker to be speaking literally.

Pragmatics n Inferential Approach –Literal Strategy n Step 5 - Contextual appropriateness, the hearer recognizes that it would be contextually appropriate for the speaker to be speaking literally. n Step 6 - Literal, the hearer recognizes what the speakers is intending to communicate literally and directly.