Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile

Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 6: Juvenile Offenders in.

Research & Evaluation. Defining Recidivism  Felony adjudication (conviction) within 3 years of release from closed custody or commitment to probation.

Juvenile Sentencing Options in Texas

Sustainability and Impact OMHSAS Children’s Bureau of Behavioral Health Services August 16, 2012 Presentation to OMHSAS Children’s Advisory Committee.

Measuring 109 In Fresno County

Research and Evaluation Center Juvenile Incarceration Trends Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. John Jay College of Criminal Justice City University of New York Webinar.

Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 5: Law Enforcement and Juvenile.

Offender Population Forecasting in Virginia. 2 Background - Studies by JLARC in 1980s  Staff of the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC)

Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision

Delinquency Dispositions: Legal Overview Janet Mason Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill March, 2006.

Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.

Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 7: Juvenile Offenders in.

Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.

DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.

1 Book Cover Here Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Juveniles and Community Corrections Corrections in the Community, 5e.

Oregon Presented by: Office of Economic Analysis Date: September 22, 2009 Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee.

Memo Series Overview  Requirements  Frequently Asked Questions  Reports  Reporting to the Federal Government Did Wisconsin Make the target.

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,

September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.

The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.

11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.

Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.

Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.

MIS REPORTING Make Your Numbers Count. Recidivism rates are of one the key goals that is reported to Congress regarding youth offender programs. Your.

Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.

LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.

Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process

Pretrial, Probation and Parole

NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.

Early Intervention Juvenile Justice Request for Responses.

Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.

The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,

Juvenile Crime and Punishment. Causes of Youth Violence Complex interplay of factors Correlations, not predictions Accumulation of risk Number of resources.

Philadelphia Prison System Leon King, Esq. Commissioner.

Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.

STANFORD FORUM ON JUVENILE JUSTICE REFORM Not your father’s youth authority… For example: 71% of youth in DJJ institutions last November were committed.

Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.

Crime and Criminal Justice Trends in Virginia Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission September 21, 2015.

The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 2: Juvenile Victims Copyright.

1 Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee Wednesday, February 24, 2010.

Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.

1 Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee Wednesday, March 24, 2010.

HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

Pamela Oliver Pamela Oliver Presentation to Governor’s Commission May The Scope of the Problem & How to Measure it.

Source: John Jay College calculations of national arrest estimates using data from Crime in the United States, 1980 through Washington, DC: Federal.

Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.

Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.

Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.

Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.

Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.

Criminal Justice Policy & Planning Division STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF POLICY & MANAGEMENT (OPM) 1 ANNUAL REPORTS.

National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.

1 Juvenile Detention Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative: Detention & Equity Reform San Francisco Juvenile Probation Commission October 12, 2016.

Summit County Probation Services

Overview of the Juvenile Justice System

Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016

Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.

Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn County Juvenile Department Mark Eddy, Ph.D.Oregon Social Learning Center Donna KeddyOregon Department of Human Services David KochMultnomah County Juvenile Department Jeffrey LichtenbergJefferson County Juvenile Department Colette PetersOregon Youth Authority

Welcome, Introductions (Torri, Damon) Review July 29 small group meeting (Torri) Progress on demand using community youth (Damon) Population trends, Forecast tracking (Damon) Roundtable – Juvenile Justice Issues Next Steps: October forecast, model work Next meeting: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 1:30 – 3:30 p.m. (same place)

Small Group Meeting Review Met July 29, 2010 Review of OYA data for 2005 – 2010 Parole and Probation Youth (felony adjudications) Mirror population of high risk youth in communities closely resembling the risk population in YCF. Group consensus that youth being supervised in the community by counties and OYA is a primary feeder into the YCF and should be part of the formula. Goal for the full committee meeting was to run the previously unrepresented probation populations of youth supervised by both counties and OYA as part of the formula to determine the juvenile closed custody forecast.

Small Group Meeting Review Follow-up Work, Progress: New data needed/wanted: –Need county supervision – who, where, when, why. –Want new predictors: detention, probation violations –Want risk assessments: Damon is confused – JCP, RNA, etc. Data received from OYA. (No good PV data.) In progress: Development of model based on the community placements. Most data work completed, but preliminary model not yet functional.

Concepts: Demand Using Community Youth Current referral-based approach: –Drop in demand more than practitioners’ observations –Assessment of all criminal referrals How can the model ‘see’ the practitioner viewpoint? –Kids on probation or parole - “community youth” –County or OYA supervision –… versus “anyone who’s ever been referred” Risk pool –Cleaner: better defined, more consistent –More closely tied to actual behavior since reviewed –Keep until adult? –Handles repeat entries (half or more)

Concepts: Demand Using Community Youth Potential Factors to Include –Referral information (same info as current) Most recent referral History of referrals for youth –Probation violations – no data –Detention episodes –Current supervision (esp. Parole)

Population Trends and Tracking Close Custody Populations PSR steadily reducing DOC increasing, flat or slightly down DOC and PSR Trends –DOC and PSR – actual beds vs. forecast –DCC population – demand index vs. forecast Referrals

Population Trends and Tracking Close Custody Populations – past decade

Population Trends and Tracking Close Custody Populations – past decade

Population Trends and Tracking Forecasts--- DOC and PSR populations, forecast: –Following expected trends –Forecast: No significant change expected Demand forecast –Based on demand index

Population Trends and Tracking DOC and PSR Populations – Long Term

Population Trends and Tracking DOC and PSR Populations – Actual, Forecast Error: +1.6% (Forecast is high by 6 beds) Error: +5% (Forecast is high by 4 beds)

Population Trends and Tracking DCC: Discretionary bed demand forecast –Based on demand index (no actuals to compare) –Compare to changes in demand index Demand from past forecasts Demand index is down 15% since Jan Graphs: Demand index and other referral trends Forecast DateDCC Demand April and almost flat Oct and decreasing April and increasing Oct and increasing April and flat

Population Trends and Tracking DCC Demand (Discretionary Bed Demand)

Population Trends and Tracking DCC Demand and Number Referrals Monthly

Population Trends and Tracking DCC Demand and Felony Referrals

Population Trends and Tracking DCC Demand and Youths’ Past Felony Referrals

Population Trends and Tracking DCC Demand and Referral Trends

Roundtable Juvenile Justice Issues Observed Trends …

Next Steps Committee Decisions October forecast –Determination of demand for discretionary Continue work on community model?

Adjourn Meeting Thank you Please call or with any other comments, ideas, issues, etc. Torri Lynn Damon Bell Next Meeting: Wednesday, September 22 at 1:30 pm (same place)

EXTRA GRAPHS

Population Trends and Tracking Length of Stay for Releases N=53 N=23

Population Trends and Tracking Average Age in Population

Number of Juveniles

THE FOLLOWING SLIDES ARE FROM THE FEBRUARY 24, 2010 COMMITTEE MEETING

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000

Referrals (felony, misdemeanor, violation, other) Population adjusted rate shows a stronger decline

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Felony Referrals

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Felony Referrals by Year and Class

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Felony Referrals – Person Related / Other

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Felony Referrals – Person Related / Other Person Related: Sex Offense Assault Homicide Related Weapons Robbery Person Other Other: Arson Burglary Theft Criminal Mischief Substance/Alcohol Other 53% Drop 30% Drop

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Felony Referrals -- Race and Type Other Person Related

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Misdemeanor Referrals Violations/other are similar to misdemeanors referrals in overall number and in change from 2000 to 2009

Statistical Summaries Decade 2000 Misdemeanor Referrals by Year and Class

Juvenile Incarceration Rate State Comparisons Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement Number of committed juveniles – total Includes state, local, public, private Calculated Rate: number per 100,000 Using ages 9-17 for denominator Rates and change in rates: 1999 and 2006 “Includes juveniles in placement in the facility as part of a court-ordered disposition. Committed juveniles may have been adjudicated and disposed in juvenile court or convicted and sentenced in criminal court.” Sickmund, Melissa, Sladky, T.J., and Kang, Wei. (2008) "Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement Databook." Online. Available:

Juvenile Incarceration Rates State Comparisons Rate per 100,000 – Year

Juvenile Incarceration Rates State Comparisons Rate per 100,000 – Year