Session 1: The Scaffolded Inquiry Project September 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
When Students Can’t Read…
A Guide to Implementation
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Deanne Gannaway Facilitating Change in Higher Education Practices.
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
PUT TITLE HERE Student Success 2011 Summer Program NAME OF YOUR MODULE HERE DAY 2 Student Success 2011 Summer Program Facilitating Learning Teams using.
Customer Focus Module Preview
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
Title I Accountability Grant to Expand the SSOS for Schools in Phases 1 & 2 1.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
TIG Ensuring Vertical Articulation in the Science Curriculum.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
1 Children First Intensive ESO NETWORK 14 CFI INQUIRY TEAM MEETING September 18, 2008 Bob Cohen, Network Leader; Deena Abu-Lughod, SAF Alan Godlewicz,
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Lesson Study: Learning to Plan Powerful Lessons Together.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Implementing Race to the Top
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Session 1: The Scaffolded Inquiry Project September 2008

2 Today’s Agenda 1.Welcome 2.Contextualizing the Scaffolded Inquiry Project 3.Break 4.Module 1: Learning challenge variable maps 5.Module 2: Research-based abstracts 6.Module 3: Additional resources for designing a change strategy 7.Debrief: Integration into your team process 8.Evaluation

3 Contextualizing The Scaffolded Inquiry Project Setting the context— >Chancellor's Priorities and School-based Inquiry > Listening to the Field and Looking Forward > Integrating the New Tools > Objectives for Professional Development

4 Inquiry and the Three Pillars Leadership: Building capacity within the Inquiry Team and throughout the school >Develop principal distributed leadership. >Provide teacher leadership opportunities through Inquiry Team work. >Support school leaders to look at data to determine student needs and identify strategies. Empowerment: Building confidence and ownership >Experience of success with small group of struggling students allows schools to deepen and expand the work. >Focus of work is customized at the school level. >Energize educators throughout the city to be continuous learners. Accountability: Highlighting the responsibility for learning of every student in the school >Focus on lowest performing students. >Create accountability for closing the achievement gap at multiple levels: individual, team, and school.

5 Design tools & Organize Data Implement Tools & Build Understanding Building & Implementing Preparing the System: Children First Intensive ‘07-’08 Children First Intensive was created to infuse data-informed instructional decision-making throughout New York City schools by engaging educators around the new accountability tools. In 2007, the New York City Department of Education implemented Inquiry Teams in every school as a core component of its school improvement strategy. Changing the culture

6 Design tools & Organize Data Implement Tools & Build Understanding Facilitate Knowledge Sharing & Collaboration Theory of Change Looking Forward: ’08-’09 Priorities Build capacity, confidence of teachers and principals Increase teacher empowerment & engagement Ensure educators are accountable for success Sustaining & Enhancing Building & Implementing Embedding & Sustaining Chancellor’s Priorities Embed and sustain the reforms through:  Inquiry Teams  Knowledge Management  ARIS Target State: Continuous, Citywide Data- Informed Improvement

7 Listening to the Field: Educator Needs Through CFI surveys, the Inquiry Team Interface, SAFs, and SSO support staff, we heard inquiry teams needed more support. Teams: >needed help identifying the next steps after determining learning challenges for their target populations >were challenged with finding time to research instructionally targeted responses >struggled to come up with instructional strategies that were different from ones they had tried before >worked to develop strategies for their students, but remained concerned that the practices implemented sometimes did not adequately address the students’ needs >were challenged when trying to adopt practices for specific students populations

8 The Scaffolded Inquiry Project  American Institutes for Research (AIR) was awarded a competitive contract to design a set of tools to help Inquiry Team members and other educators select research-based instructional strategies for their struggling students.  The Steering Committee consisted of SAFs, SSO Design Team staff, CFI, KM, and subject specific content experts from Teaching & Learning and the Office of Accountability.  The Tools created:  Variable maps  Research-based abstracts  Additional resources for Inquiry Teams  Professional Development materials

9 Integration in the CFI Process Phase I: Identify Students and Targets Step 1: Define a school-wide focus. Step 2: Define a target population. Step 3: Define a long-term goal. Step 4: Define learning targets and short-term goals. Phase II: Move the Students Step 5: Analyze target population conditions of learning. Step 6: Design and implement an instructional change strategy. Step 7: Evaluate and revise based on interim progress measures. Phase III: Move the System Step 8: Analyze school-level systems that produce conditions of learning. Step 9: Design and implement a system-level change strategy. Step 10: Evaluate and revise based on interim progress measures. American Institutes for Research (AIR) has focused on Step 6 of the inquiry cycle.

10 Professional Development Objectives Introductory Session: Learn how to access and utilize the technology platform:  Learning challenge variable maps to guide educators’ thinking around instructional approaches  Research-based abstracts to support the identified variables  Additional resources to support Inquiry Teams Train-the-Trainer Session: Plan and practice training techniques for sharing the Scaffolded Inquiry Process with school-based teams Develop turn-key options for delivery

11 Our Purpose Support the work of Inquiry Teams in NYC as they design a change strategy by:  Providing high quality variable maps around particular learning challenges, research abstracts, and additional resources that can help Inquiry Teams design a change strategy.  Supporting the SAFs and SSO staff to integrate research into their work with school-based Inquiry Teams.  Supporting the launch of these tools with professional development materials for SAFs and SSO staff.

12 Designing a Change Strategy Phase I: Identify Students and Targets Step 1: Define a school-wide focus. Step 2: Define a target population. Step 3: Define a long-term goal. Step 4: Define learning targets and short-term goals. Phase II: Move the Students Step 5: Analyze target population conditions of learning. Step 6: Design and implement an instructional change strategy. Step 7: Evaluate and revise based on interim progress measures. Phase III: Move the System Step 8: Analyze school-level systems that produce conditions of learning. Step 9: Design and implement a system-level change strategy. Step 10: Evaluate and revise based on interim progress measures. American Institutes for Research (AIR) has focused on Step 6 of the inquiry cycle.

13 Scope of the Scaffolded Inquiry Project The tools consists of:  16 variable maps developed for ELA and Mathematics  400 research-based abstracts  12 additional resources for designing a change strategy  Professional development materials

14 Welcome to the Scaffolded Inquiry Project Web site

15 Session 1: Outline of Binder Materials Manuals contain:  All slides and narration  Outline  Intro and three modules  Sample abstracts  All additional resources

Session 1: The Scaffolded Inquiry Project September 2008 BREAK

17 Module 1: Learning Challenge Variable Maps

18 Variable Maps Discussion: Your team has identified a learning challenge – what next?

19 Variable Maps  Bridge the inquiry work from considering conditions of learning to exploring the research.  Present variables that surround commonly identified skill gaps.  Prompt educators’ thinking about the range of variables that impact student achievement.  Organize sets of research-based strategies into factors that impact skill gaps.

20 Tab Displaying Learning Challenges

21 Exploring a Variable Map

22 Classroom-Level Variables  Instructional practices for content knowledge, study skills, and student engagement Research-based strategies to address  specific knowledge and skills related to the content of the learning challenge  students’ engagement, interest, and interactions with teachers  Classroom instructional environment Research-based materials and routines that can support the change strategy

23 School Organization and Culture Variables  School organizational environment Research-based organizational structures and decisions that can support student learning  School-level curricular and assessment resources Research-based resources that can be leveraged to support the change strategy  Culture of professional learning Cultural habits and practices that can support collaboration and learning

24 Search Results Hover with your mouse over the name of a strategy to open up a window with further details about the strategy. Click on the name of a strategy to access the full abstract.

25 ACTIVITY: Variable Maps Explore the variable maps:  Choose a learning challenge (ELA).  Explore the variables in classroom and school levels.  Identify variables to search (click to select, then click Submit).  Browse the abstracts titles that are returned. Reflect:  Do these variables reflect some of the conditions of learning faced by your Inquiry Teams? Why or why not?

26 Module 2: Research-based Abstracts

27 Abstracts  Bridge the variable maps to actual implementation strategies.  Represent a careful literature review on each learning challenge.  Describe research-based instructional or organizational strategies.  Summarize one or more studies.  Point to additional related research.  Include sample activities as examples.

28 Developing the Abstracts  Team of ten researchers reviewed literature and wrote abstracts.  Focused on original quantitative and qualitative studies, literature reviews and meta-analyses.  Included published research only.  Published in the last 30 years (no earlier than 1978).  Remember: abstracts represent a strong beginning, but Teams must explore research on their own as well.

29 Sample Abstract Each abstract presents:  Title of Strategy  Why is This Strategy Useful?  Description  Research Evidence  Sample Studies  Sample Activities  Additional Resources

30 Refining Search Results

31 Activity: Finding Abstracts Explore the abstracts:  Choose a learning challenge.  Search variables for abstracts.  Filter the findings in various ways.  Browse the abstracts that are returned. Reflect:  How might you work with your networks to introduce these abstracts to your teams?

32 Module 3: Additional Resources

33 Accessing Additional Resources

34 Consider Conditions of Learning Use this resource to:  Guide discussion on the what, how, how well, and who of the conditions  Brainstorm means for Collecting Data  Plan for analysis of the data – What to Look For

35 Explore the Research Base Use this resource to:  Demonstrate how the research abstracts are structured  Guide comprehension and questioning of the abstracts  Find linked tools and understand their alignment Other resources include:  Using the Variable Maps  Variable Map Legend  Understanding Types of Research  Finding Research on Your Own

36 Evaluate Strategies Use one of these 3 resource options to:  Guide discussion  Check the “fit” of the strategy  Determine which modifications may be necessary  Make decisions about implementation  Consider impacts on school change

37 Generate Hypotheses and a Change Strategy Use this resource to:  Document team decisions  Articulate rationale and assumptions  Put it all together into a change strategy

38 Plan for Implementation Use this resource to:  Consider the many elements to implementation  Plan for coordinated activities  Document team decisions Other resource include:  Implementation Check-up

39 Debrief: Integration Into Your Team Process