March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk1 Electronics for the  e  experiment at PSI Short introduction Trigger electronics DAQ electronics Slow Control For the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of the DRS Chip for Fast Waveform Digitizing Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Advertisements

20. Feb. 2002, LTP1 Electronics for the  e  experiment Short introduction and status Trigger electronics DAQ electronics Slow Control Developments useful.
Digital RF Stabilization System Based on MicroTCA Technology - Libera LLRF Robert Černe May 2010, RT10, Lisboa
January 28th, 2010Clermont Ferrand, Paul Scherrer Institut DRS Chip Developments Stefan Ritt.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Ultrafast 16-channel ADC for NICA-MPD Forward Detectors A.V. Shchipunov Join Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
Design and Performance of the 6 GS/s Waveform Digitizing Chip DRS4 Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland at 40 mW per channel.
Large Area, High Speed Photo-detectors Readout Jean-Francois Genat + On behalf and with the help of Herve Grabas +, Samuel Meehan +, Eric Oberla +, Fukun.
NA61 Coll. Meeting 09 Oct Alessandro Bravar NA61 Readout Upgrade based on the DRS.
1 Electronics Status of the MEG Trigger system Status and plans for DAQ MSCB slow control system Status of the MEG Trigger system Status and plans for.
July 16/17, 2002 MUEGAMMA review PSI1 Slow Control.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
Fast Waveform Digitizing in Radiation Detection using Switched Capacitor Arrays Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Lecce - 23 Sep The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada1 A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Motivation.
LECC 2004 – Boston – September 13 th L.Guiducci – INFN Bologna 1 The Muon Sorter in the CMS Drift Tubes Regional Trigger G.M. Dallavalle, Luigi Guiducci,
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
The Trigger Prototype Board Status Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of trigger group D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
Prototype Test of SPring-8 FADC Module Da-Shung Su Wen-Chen Chang 02/07/2002.
UCN-nEDM DAQ DAQ and Slow Control L.Lee 1 July 3, 2013.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
Understanding Data Acquisition System for N- XYTER.
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
LNL 1 SLOW CONTROLS FOR CMS DRIFT TUBE CHAMBERS M. Bellato, L. Castellani INFN Sezione di Padova.
DAQ+trigger operation during 2008 run D. Nicolò University of Pisa & INFN, Pisa.
Tackling the search for Lepton Flavor Violation with GHz waveform digitizing using the DRS chip Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
March 2002, JINR Dubna1 A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Introduction.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Development of high speed waveform sampling ASICs Stefan Ritt - Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland NSNI – 2010, Mumbai, India.
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
EUDRB: the data reduction board of the EUDET pixel telescope Lorenzo Chiarelli, Angelo Cotta Ramusino, Livio Piemontese, Davide Spazian Università & INFN.
Parallel Data Acquisition Systems for a Compton Camera
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Dec. 8th, 2000NOON A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Introduction.
Peter-Bernd Otte - 8 th March 2010 CB collaboration meeting, Mainz.
PSI - 11 Feb The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
MOLLER DAQ Aug 2015 meeting Team : R. Michaels, P. M. King, M. Gericke, K. Kumar R. Michaels, MOLLER Meeting, Aug, 2015.
Jefferson Laboratory Hall A SuperBigBite Spectrometer Data Acquisition System Alexandre Camsonne APS DNP 2013 October 24 th 2013 Hall A Jefferson Laboratory.
Front-End Electronics for G-APDs Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
TYPE1 BOARD Type1 boards are compliant with 6U VME standard. Each board receives 16 analog signals from experimental devices. These signals are digitized.
PSI - 11 Feb Status of the electronic systems of the MEG Experiment.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
1 Level 1 Pre Processor and Interface L1PPI Guido Haefeli L1 Review 14. June 2002.
Pisa - Apr. 28th, The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa.
New digital readout of HFRAMDON neutron counters Proposal Version 2.
THE WaveDAQ SYSTEM FOR THE MEG II UPGRADE … read out by MIDAS Stefan Ritt, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland 15 July 2015MIDAS Workshop, TRIUMF Paul.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
DAQ ELECTRONICS 18 March 2015MEG Collaboration Meeting, Tokyo Stefan Ritt.
Vladimir Zhulanov for BelleII ECL group Budker INP, Novosibirsk INSTR2014, Novosibirsk 2014/02/28 1.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Magnet Slowcontrol Overview Mu3e DAQ system
Update of time measurement results with the USB WaveCatcher board & Electronics for the DIRC-like TOF prototype at SLAC D.Breton , L.Burmistov,
The WaveDAQ System for the MEG II Upgrade
Possible Upgrades ToF readout Trigger Forward tracking
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Commodity Flash ADC-FPGA Based Electronics for an
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
BESIII EMC electronics
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa
Presentation transcript:

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk1 Electronics for the  e  experiment at PSI Short introduction Trigger electronics DAQ electronics Slow Control For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland)

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk2 Search for  e  down to MEG Detector LFV Process forbidden by SM oscillations expected to enhance LFV rate Present limit: (MEGA) SUSY Theories: ~ LFV Process forbidden by SM oscillations expected to enhance LFV rate Present limit: (MEGA) SUSY Theories: ~ Required:   stopping rate: 10 8 /s Resolutions (all FWHM):  E e : 0.7%  E  : 52.8 MeV  e  : 12 mrad  t e  : 150ps Required:   stopping rate: 10 8 /s Resolutions (all FWHM):  E e : 0.7%  E  : 52.8 MeV  e  : 12 mrad  t e  : 150ps E e = 52.8 MeV Kinematics  e  = 180° E  = 52.8 MeV e  

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk3 Detector Design Tests & Design Assembly Engineering Run Data taking m

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk4 Status Large Prototype Currently largest LXe detector in (224 PMTs, 150l), Contains all critical parts of final detector Currently tested with 40 MeV  ’s in Tsukuba, Japan First results in energy and position resolution expected next weeks

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk5 Trigger Electronics

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk6 Trigger Requirements  Beam rate10 8 s -1  Fast LXe energy sum > 45MeV2  10 3 s -1   interaction point  e + hit point in timing counter  time correlation  – e s -1  angular corrlation  – e + 20 s -1  Beam rate10 8 s -1  Fast LXe energy sum > 45MeV2  10 3 s -1   interaction point  e + hit point in timing counter  time correlation  – e s -1  angular corrlation  – e + 20 s -1 E e = 52.8 MeV Kinematics  e  = 180° E  = 52.8 MeV e   M.C. Total ~800 PMTs Common noise contributes significantly to analog sum AC coupling  Baseline drift How to evaluate  of shower center? Total ~800 PMTs Common noise contributes significantly to analog sum AC coupling  Baseline drift How to evaluate  of shower center?

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk7 Digital Trigger VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS Type2 LVDS Type1 8 channels clck, clear VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS 48 bits output 100MHz 10bit VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS 48 bits output 100MHz 10bit VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS 48 bits output 100MHz 10bit VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM FADC LVDS FPGA SRAM LVDS 48 bits output 100MHz 10bit All PMTs in trigger Board hierarchy with LVDS interconnect Use FPGA with double capacity All PMTs in trigger Board hierarchy with LVDS interconnect Use FPGA with double capacity

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk8 Latch Baseline Subtraction Baseline Subtraction Latch 10 bit 100 MHz Clock    - + <thr  + - Baseline Register Uses ~120 out of 5000 logic cells  8 channels/FPGA use 20% of chip Uses ~120 out of 5000 logic cells  8 channels/FPGA use 20% of chip Baseline subtracted signal LUT 10x10 Calibrated and linearized signal

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk9 QT Algorithm original waveform smoothed and differentiated (Difference Of Samples) Threshold in DOS Region for pedestal evaluation integration area t Inspired by H1 Fast Track Trigger (A. Schöning) Hit region defined when Difference of Samples is above threshold Integration of original signal in hit region Pedestal evaluated in region before hit Time interpolated using maximum value and two neighbor values in LUT  1ns resolution for 10ns sampling time Inspired by H1 Fast Track Trigger (A. Schöning) Hit region defined when Difference of Samples is above threshold Integration of original signal in hit region Pedestal evaluated in region before hit Time interpolated using maximum value and two neighbor values in LUT  1ns resolution for 10ns sampling time 10ns

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk10 Trigger latency BS    Max T[ns] >45MeV   e+ AND 10 stages = 1024 chn... ADC Inter-board communication: 120ns Total: 350ns (simulated) ~600 chn. / 10 bit At 100 MHz  75 GB/s processing power In 2 VME crates

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk11 Prototype board ADC Signal- Generator DAC FPGA Trigger built by INFN, Pisa Fully simulated Trigger built by INFN, Pisa Fully simulated

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk12 DAQ Electronics

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk13 DAQ Hardware Requirements n E[MeV] ee t PMT sum e    e    e  51.5 MeV MeV  ’s hitting different parts of LXe can be separated if > 2 PMTs apart (15 cm) Timely separated  ’s need waveform digitizing > 300 MHz If waveform digitizing gives timing <100ps, no TDCs are needed  ’s hitting different parts of LXe can be separated if > 2 PMTs apart (15 cm) Timely separated  ’s need waveform digitizing > 300 MHz If waveform digitizing gives timing <100ps, no TDCs are needed ~100ns ee

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk14  Domino Sampling Chip Existing: 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling speed 128 sampling cells Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit ~ 60 $/channel Needed: 2.5 GHz sampling speed Circular domino wave 1024 sampling cells 40 MHz readout < 100ps accuracy Existing: 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling speed 128 sampling cells Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit ~ 60 $/channel Needed: 2.5 GHz sampling speed Circular domino wave 1024 sampling cells 40 MHz readout < 100ps accuracy C. Brönnimann et al., NIM A420 (1999) 264

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk15 New Domino Ring Sampler (DRS) Free running domino wave, stopped with trigger Sampling speed 2 GHz (500ps/bin), trigger gate sampling gives 50ps timing resolution 1024 bins  150ns waveform + 350ns delay Free running domino wave, stopped with trigger Sampling speed 2 GHz (500ps/bin), trigger gate sampling gives 50ps timing resolution 1024 bins  150ns waveform + 350ns delay input

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk16 DAQ Board 8 inputs trigger gate FADC 3 state switches FPGA SRAM shift register 9 channels  1024 bins / 40 MHz = 230  s  acceptable dead time Zero suppression in FPGA QT Algorithm in FPGA (store waveform if multi-hit) Read out through VME or LVDS 9 channels  1024 bins / 40 MHz = 230  s  acceptable dead time Zero suppression in FPGA QT Algorithm in FPGA (store waveform if multi-hit) Read out through VME or LVDS 40 MHz 12 bit VME Interface (Cypress) 3.3V 2.5V 8 channel DRS Trigger Input Board inter-connect FPGA SRAM FADC 8 channel DRS 8 channel DRS FADC 8 channel DRS Trigger BUS (2 nd level tr.) domino wave

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk17 Status DRS Simulation finished in AMS 0.35  process Layout started Switch to 0.25  process First version summer ’02 Readout with trigger prototype board Costs per channel: ~25$ (board) + 6$ (chip)

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk18 “Redefinition” of DAQ Conventional New AC couplingBaseline subtraction Const. Fract. Discriminator DOS – Zero crossing ADCNumerical Integration TDC Bin interpolation (LUT) Waveform Fitting Scaler (250 MHz)Scaler (50 MHz) OscilloscopeWaveform sampling 400 US$ / channel50 US$ / channel TDC Disc. ADC Scaler Scope FADC FPGA SRAM DSC ~GHz 100 MHz

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk19 Slow Control Electronics

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk20 Slow Control HV PC RS Temperature, pressure, … GPIB Valves ??? 15° C heater PLC 12: : : : : : : : MIDAS DAQ Ethernet Terminal Server

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk21 Slow Control Bus HV Temperature, pressure, …Valves heater MIDAS DAQ

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk22 Field Bus Solutions CAN, Profibus, LON available Node with ADC >100$ Interoperatibility not guaranteed Protocol overhead Local CPU? User programmable? How to integrate in HV? (CAEN use CAENET) CAN, Profibus, LON available Node with ADC >100$ Interoperatibility not guaranteed Protocol overhead Local CPU? User programmable? How to integrate in HV? (CAEN use CAENET)

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk23 Generic Node ADuC812 / C8051F000 Micro controllers RS485 over flat ribbon Flat ribbon connector Power through bus Costs ~30$ Piggy back board ADuC812 / C8051F000 Micro controllers RS485 over flat ribbon Flat ribbon connector Power through bus Costs ~30$ Piggy back board

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk24 2 versions Generic node with signal conditioning Sub-master with power supply and PC connection (Parallel Port, USB planned) Integration on sensors, in crates RS232 node planned BUS Oriented Crate Oriented 19” crate with custom backplane Generic node as piggy-back Cards for analog IO / digital IO / °C / 220V crate connects to parallel port (USB)

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk25 Midas Slow Control Bus 256 nodes, nodes with one level of repeaters Bus length ~500m opto-isolated Boards for voltage, current, thermo couples, TTL IO, 220V output Readout speed: 0.3s for 1000 channels C library, command-line utility, Midas driver, LabView driver Nodes are “self-documenting” Configuration parameters in EEPROM on node Node CPU can operate autonomously for interlock and regulation (PID) tasks (C programmable) Nodes can be reprogrammed over network nodes, nodes with one level of repeaters Bus length ~500m opto-isolated Boards for voltage, current, thermo couples, TTL IO, 220V output Readout speed: 0.3s for 1000 channels C library, command-line utility, Midas driver, LabView driver Nodes are “self-documenting” Configuration parameters in EEPROM on node Node CPU can operate autonomously for interlock and regulation (PID) tasks (C programmable) Nodes can be reprogrammed over network

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk26 High Voltage System  C node Opto-couplers External HV

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk27 HV performance Regulates common HV source V, ~1mA DAC 16bit, ADC 14bit Current trip ~10  s Self-calibration with two high accuracy reference voltages Accuracy <0.3V absolute Boards with 12 channels, crates with 192 channels 30$/channel (+ext. HV) Regulates common HV source V, ~1mA DAC 16bit, ADC 14bit Current trip ~10  s Self-calibration with two high accuracy reference voltages Accuracy <0.3V absolute Boards with 12 channels, crates with 192 channels 30$/channel (+ext. HV) Prototype

March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk28 Conclusions FPGA-based trigger with 100MHz FADC designed 2 GHz waveform sampling on all channels planned HV system with 0.3V accuracy designed New slow control system (30$/node, 300  s readout) Transition prototype  series Physics runs in 2005 Can be useful for other experiments In case of interest: FPGA-based trigger with 100MHz FADC designed 2 GHz waveform sampling on all channels planned HV system with 0.3V accuracy designed New slow control system (30$/node, 300  s readout) Transition prototype  series Physics runs in 2005 Can be useful for other experiments In case of interest: Transparencies on Muegamma Web Site: