BACK TO SCHOOL 2015-2016 Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
LMST Meeting February 2013 COMMON CORE, FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING, AND LIBRARY MEDIA.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Evaluating the school librarian using the Danielson Model
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Session Materials  Wiki
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Roles of the Media Specialist By: Julie Schwoebel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Task Force Literacy Task Force Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson, Sarah Breed, Phil Tucher, Elizabeth Macias,
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
1 School Library Assessment: The Learning Environment A.R.K.S. Elementary School.
Final Portfolio The Roles of the School Library Media Specialist Stephanie Warmoth Spring 2012.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Comprehensive Planning
NJCU College of Education
Presentation transcript:

BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings

Evaluation Task Force Findings What Is It Why We Started Where We Are What We’ve Accomplished Where We’re Going Needed: Your Input

What Is It? Evaluations  Standards of Excellence and Framework for Teaching How Do Library Media Specialists Fit?  Evaluation  Maryland College and Career Readiness Standards  Schools

Timeline October 2011-June 2013: MSDE gives local control of specialists’ evaluation June 2013-June 2015: Draft Library Media Specialist Model conceived June 2015: First Task Force Meeting August 19, 2015: First Draft Presented to All LMS August 19, 2015: Launch survey for feedback October 2, 2015: Feedback deadline Next Steps: Refine/Post for comment, Union presentation, OTD refinement, Board Approval

Who’s On the Task Force? Library Media Specialists (22 responded/15 participated) Edgar Betenga, Office of Employee Performance & Evaluation Principal PGCEA Union Rep Instructional Directors Shari Blohm Lori Carter

Why We Started Since SY  High schools allotted 1.0 certified LMS  ES and MS allotted 0.5 certified LMS  Administrators may use site funding to purchase additional 0.5  Positions change annually  Populations served not balanced  Schedules vary across county; duties often not commensurate with student achievement  Recruitment rates dropping  LITERACY FOCUS IS SYSTEMIC GOAL

What are the Goals and Objectives of the Task Force? Goals and Objectives  Create a School Library Media Specialist Evaluation document aligned with FfT  Align evaluation of the SLMS position across system (1.0 and 0.5 balance)  Share our work with all SLMS for feedback  Share with PGCEA, School Board for approval  Share with administrators system-wide

Where We Are First Draft is Completed

Our Roles Roles According to AASL  Teacher  Instructional Partner  Information Specialist  Program Administrator  Leader  Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Media Programs, 2009.

AASL Emerging Trends:  Open access to library information 24/7  Implement projects with global networking  Integrate technology directly into curriculum  Connect SLMP outcomes to broader learning outcomes  Increase collaboration with classroom teachers  Anticipating classroom needs and driving information to them

Roles According to AASL Teacher  Empowers students to become critical thinkers, enthusiastic readers, skillful researchers, and ethical users of information.

Roles According to AASL Instructional Partner  Works with school community to develop policies, practices, and curricula. Collaborates to develop assignments aligned with standards, critical thinking skills, technology and information literacy skills, and core social skills and cultural competencies. Guides instructional design by working with classroom teacher to establish learning objectives, goals, and implementing assessment strategies before, during and after assigned units.

Roles According to AASL Information Specialist  Uses technology to supplement school resources, assist in creation of engaging learning tasks, connect the school with global learning, communicate with students/teachers any time, 24/7 access to library services. Introduces and models emerging technologies, strategies for finding, assessing, and using information. Expertise in ethical use of information.

Roles According to AASL Program Administrator  Assures that all members of the learning community have access to resources that meet a variety of needs and interests. Collaborative development of the program mission, strategic plan, policies, and effective management of staff, program budget, and the physical and virtual spaces. Works actively to form partnerships with stakeholders and sister organizations at local and global levels. Addresses broader educational issues with other educators in the building, at the district level, and at the professional association level.

Roles According to AASL Leader  Information literacy and technology skills - the SLMS must lead the way in building 21st-century skills throughout the school environment. Willingness to serve as teacher and a learner who listens to and acts upon good ideas from peers, teachers, and students. Increased professional commitment and a thorough knowledge of the challenges and opportunities facing the profession. Active member of the local and global learning communities. Advocate for student learning.

Documents Collaboration of:  AASL’s L4L Sample School Librarian Performance and Evaluation System  linesandstandards/learning4life/resources/LMS- DANIELSON.pdf linesandstandards/learning4life/resources/LMS- DANIELSON.pdf  Educator’s Handbook for Professional Growth Addendum, Library Media Specialist. Framework for Teaching.  ucators_handbook_for_professional_growth_2008_add.pdf ucators_handbook_for_professional_growth_2008_add.pdf

Documents Collaboration of:  Danielson Library Media Specialist Framework, Charles County Office of Library Media (Secondary/Elementary)  New York State Board of Education, Nassau County BOCES  leaders/practicerubrics/Docs/nyla-rubric.pdf leaders/practicerubrics/Docs/nyla-rubric.pdf Implementing the Common Core: The Role of the School Librarian  ations/CCSSLibrariansBrief_FINAL.pdf ations/CCSSLibrariansBrief_FINAL.pdf “A 21st-Century Approach to School Librarian Evaluation”, AASL, 2012 “Standards for the 21st-Century Learner in Action”, AASL, 2009

What We’ve Accomplished Evaluation Document (16 Components)  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  1c – Setting Instructional Outcomes  1e – Designing Coherent Instruction  1f – Designing Student Assessments  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  2a – Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport  2b – Establishing a Culture for Learning  2c – Managing Classroom Procedure  2d – Managing Student Behavior  2e – Organizing Physical Space

What We’ve Accomplished Evaluation Document (16 Components)  Domain 3: Instruction  3a – Communicating With Students  3b – Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques  3c – Engaging Students in Learning  3d – Using Assessment in Instruction  3e – Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities  4a – Reflecting on Teaching  4c – Communication with Families  4e – Growing and Developing Professionally

What We’ve Accomplished Evaluation Document (16 Components)

Where Are We Going

Professional Development Wiki Needed: Your Input! Review the First Draft Document of Evaluation Rubric Complete the Survey Access the LiveBinder for Professional Development Links

Let’s Go to the Wiki

Have a Great Year!