Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
SWPBS Implementation Blueprint - revised George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Mar
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Mark Weist, Ph.D. University of South Carolina Carolina Network for School Mental Health Myrtle Beach, January 9, 2014.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
PBS District Leadership Team Presented by: Ericka Guynes, PBS Coach David Douglas School District,
School District School Board SW-PBIS Implementation Date Name(s)
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Healthy Schools Leadership Program Findings and Lessons Learned.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
VTPBiS School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies Define.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL CLIMATE TRANSFORMATION GRANT.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District

Systems Change “For every increment of performance I demand from you, I have an equal responsibility to provide you with the capacity to meet that expectation” (R. Elmore, 2002)

Big Ideas Implementation is not a single event A mission‐oriented process involving multiple decisions, actions, and corrections Continuous Improvement Anchored to tiered framework Always connected to strategic plan

Implementing PBIS We must think carefully about our purpose, players, and position to determine priorities and courses of action (Harn, 2008)

LEADERSHIP TEAM Primary function: leadership and coordination of multi- level system of support Representation of appropriate range of share- holders Individuals who have adequate and designated time to manage day-to-day operation Individuals who put policy and action-planning into place Individuals who inform leadership team on implementation outcomes Individuals who have authority to determine implementation

Self-assesses annually /SWPBS_ImplementationBlueprint_vSep_23_2010.pdf /SWPBS_ImplementationBlueprint_vSep_23_2010.pdf Creates 3-5 year action plan based on self assessment Quarterly meetings with solid purpose and process

Training capacity Tier 2 – 4 day series plus TA Administrator, pupil service representative, special education representative, regular education representative, external coach, link to tier 1 team Quarterly networking TA opportunities Information/ professional development for full staff, new staff, families

Tier 3 RENEW/Wraparound 4 day series – 1 day for systems team, 3 days for facilitators Quarterly/monthly online technical assistance Complex FBA/BIP – 3 day series – 1 day for systems team, two days for facilitators Quarterly/monthly technical assistance Professional Development for full staff, new staff, parents

Coaching Capacity Coaching network that establishes and maintains MLSS work Tier 1, internal and external coaches Tier 2, tier 3 external coaches.4 FTE for 3 schools Technical assistance around systems challenges, and intervention errors Provide ongoing support to implementers and facilitators

Evaluation Evaluation process and schedule Extent to which teams are using tier 2, tier 3 supports, impact on student outcomes, implementation of leadership team action plan School based information system in place ODR – Big 5X2 Tier 2 – Daily Progress Report data Tier 3 – SIMEO, ISIS

System level evaluation Special education referrals, disproportionality, interaction between academic and behavior outcomes, ongoing progress monitoring, intervention and placement decisions District Data Audit Tool Annual report of implementation integrity and outcomes disseminated BAT, MATT, Tier 3 intervention integrity tools

Behavioral and Content Expertise Multiple team members have expertise and experience to ensure implementation integrity Training, coaching and evaluation Reading, Mathematics, Behavior

Funding Stable funding sources for at least 3 years Training, coaching, facilitation, collaboration time, systems support Related initiatives assessed and integrated Tier 2– targeted interventions for academics and behavior Tier 3 – individualized interventions for academics and behavior Staffing, curriculum, collaboration time

Visibility Stakeholders are informed about activities and accomplishments Multi-level systems tool, Automated Tracking Tool rces.html rces.html Data stories/success stories Assure that recognition is visible and culturally and contextually relevant

Political Support Social behavior of ALL students is one of top 3-5 goals for the district Document a functional link between academic gains, social behavior and school climate Annual reporting to political body Cabinet, school board, community mental health collaborators Participation and support by chief administrator

Policy Policy statement developed and endorsed Need and rationale, purpose and benefits, measurable outcomes, activities and operations for achieving objectives, evaluation strategy MLSS responsibilities embedded in interview questions, job descriptions, new educator training Dedicated intervention time, flexible work hours/ location

Implementation data and outcomes reviewed semi-annually to refine policy Aggregated MATT, BAT Student outcome Audit of existing related initiatives conducted annually to refine policy Increased organizational efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, durability and scalability Integrated action plan developed Link Working smarter matrix