Classified Evaluation System April 2015 Why are we here? Why are things changing? How does this affect me? How can I provide input?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District CASE Presentation July 2014.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
Illinois Principal Preparation Program Internship Assessment Rubric
Orientation: Classified Evaluation Process
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Management: A System for Success UCLA Library.
System Office Performance Management
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
Today’s website:
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Educator Effectiveness Update September Training Outcomes Review the WPSD Evaluation System – Overall Focus – New & Modified Components – System.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Castle / Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CK CAST) Phase I Professional Development
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Rubrics Principal Evaluation Model Examples. Note… In the state examples given the Principal/Asst. Principal is evaluated by the “Superintendent” or “Designee”
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District.
C OMPREHENSIVE & F OCUSED E VALUATIONS U SING P IVOT CEL5D+ Training Summer 2015 This session will: Give an overview of Comprehensive and Focused Evaluations.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
System Office Performance Management
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
The New Educator Evaluation System
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness
The New Educator Evaluation System
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
State Board of Education Progress Update
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness Initial Training
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Classified Evaluation System April 2015 Why are we here? Why are things changing? How does this affect me? How can I provide input?

Overarching Goal Align Classified Evaluation System with Educator Effectiveness – Professional Rubric – Growth Goals – Process – Timelines

Today’s Goal Provide an Overview of the Proposed Evaluation Process Provide Draft Versions of the Professional Practice Rubric, Goal Template, & Evaluation Cycle Solicit Input for Updating Job Descriptions Capture Needs, Steps, Excitements & Worries (Compass Point Feedback Sheets)

Evaluation Overview 50% Growth Objectives 50% Professional Practice  Rubric Tied to Job Description  Input  Professional Interactions  Observations  Feedback from Direct Supervisor  School Performance Framework (20%)  Individual Growth Objectives (80%)

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE By Cindy Wallace WPHS Building Secretary 50% Growth Objectives 50% Professional Practice

Classified Evaluation Rubric Achieved practices marked within the rubric Staff self-assess in the Fall; Evaluator assessment by the Spring Evidence gathered from Professional Interactions, Observations, & Feedback from Direct Supervisor Rubric completed on-line in the WPSD Dashboard program; Training provided in the Fall

Standards Performance Rating Levels Elements of the Standard Professional Practices Rubric Structure

Rating Levels Accomplished and Exemplary Ratings: Represents actions that improve the workplace environment and Exceed District Standards Proficient Ratings: Represents actions that Meet District Standards Basic & Partially Proficient Ratings: Represents actions that are Approaching District Standards

Standards Standard 1: Job Competency as Related to the Job Description (50%) Standard 2: Relationships (25%) Standard 3: Professionalism (25%)

Processing Time Take 5 minutes to look over the elements and practices within the rubric and write any questions or concerns on the Compass Points Feedback Sheets

GROWTH OBJECTIVES 50% Growth Objectives 50% Professional Practice By Tina Cassens Central Office

WPSD Growth Components 20% School Performance Framework 80% Individual Growth Objectives

School Performance Framework (SPF)

80% Growth Objectives 2 Growth Objectives Grounded in Job Description Focus Question: How do I make what I do better? (Not more)

Growth Objective Format Performance Standard/Element Measurable Goal Activities to Accomplish Goal Timeline Evidence of Goal Completion

Processing Time Take 5 minutes to brainstorm possible goals for next year Note any questions or needs on the Compass Points Feedback Sheet

CYCLES & TIMELINES By Tina Cassens Central Office

WPSD Evaluation System Process Year-long Clear timelines Cyclical

JOB DESCRIPTIONS By Tina Cassens Central Office

Job Description Updates Input Form – Title/Department/Direct Supervisor – Summary of the Position (“Elevator Speech”) – 8 – 10 Essential Duties & Responsibilities – Certificates/Training/Equipment/Programs/ Physical Requirements Sample on the District Website > Departments> Educator Effectiveness

Processing Time Take 5 minutes to jot down components of your job description

NEXT STEPS By Andrea Hank WPHS Profound SPED Para

Next Steps Return Compass Points sheets as you leave Devote time with your team this afternoon to brainstorm job descriptions Completed Job Descriptions due to Tina Cassens by May 15 th Look over all documents and send feedback to Tina Cassens Continue making a difference!