Internal Review AdvancED Standards for Quality Systems © 2013 AdvancED1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Organizational Succession Planning Board Discussion Framework.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
The Big Apple (core and all!) Arts School Network New York City October 2013.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work Digital Learning Institution.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
AdvancED Systems Accreditation © 2012 AdvancED AdvancED Kentucky Office Summer, 2012.
School Accreditation. What is AdvancED’s accreditation? All schools in Nebraska are required to be accreditated. AdvancED is the largest accreditation.
Assessment Professional Learning Module 4: Assessment AS Learning.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
2014 External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of State Support (OSS)
The AdvancED Protocol:
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
“You can enhance or destroy students’ desire to succeed in school more quickly and permanently through your use of assessment than with any other tools.
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Customer Focus Module Preview
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
Paper Presented at the Standing Conference for African National and University Libraries in East, Central and Southern Africa (SCANUL – ECS), 1st and 2nd.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Assessing Student Learning
Using ASSIST to Complete the Indiana School Improvement Plan
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools/ Council on Accreditation and School Improvement
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
2.0 Leadership Team and Systems Review Winter 2012.
Determining Student Mastery: Achieving learning potential using assessment Drew Maerz Asheboro City Schools July 8, 2014.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Accreditation Collier County Public Schools Fall 2015.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
Customer Focus Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint is.
Development of Education Quality Management System Ričardas Ališauskas Ministry of Education and Science of Lithuania Rotterdam.
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Presented by Dr. Jonathan Leff Parent iZone Meeting, 11/12/2015.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
2 ASSIST for Schools/Districts An Overview of the Framework Dr. W. Darrell Barringer.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
 Rubrics for Literacy Learning.  What is your current view of rubrics? What do you know about them and what experiences have you had using them ? Self.
Coaching protocol practice Each team select a map (unit) to use for the coaching protocol. Join another person / team not from your grade or department.
AdvancED Systems Accreditation Principals’ Meeting October 14-15, 2015.
Assessing Logistics System Supply Chain Management 1.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Multi-Rater Assessments The Next Step in Your Professional Development from ICMA University.
Recognizing Quality School Systems Billy K. Floyd, Director Mary Ann Keeley, Director Richard Parkins, Assoc. Director Southeast Region Northeast Region.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
The British Accreditation Council: ensuring standards
AdvancED Accreditation
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Organizational Succession Planning
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Catoosa County Schools
AdvancED/SACS and Strategic Planning Update
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Presentation transcript:

Internal Review AdvancED Standards for Quality Systems © 2013 AdvancED1

Session Goals  Gain awareness of the new AdvancED Standards for Quality Systems  Complete a Self Assessment by buildings  Identify potential evidence to support the Self Assessment 2© 2013 AdvancED

School Systems Accreditation School 1 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* School 1 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* System Executive Summary System Self-Assessment System Assurances System Student Performance* System Improvement Plan School Stakeholder Feedback* System Executive Summary System Self-Assessment System Assurances System Student Performance* System Improvement Plan School Stakeholder Feedback* School 2 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* School 2 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* School 3 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* School 3 Executive Summary Self-Assessment Assurances Student Performance* Improvement Plan Stakeholder Feedback* * Does not count toward accreditation status until © 2013 AdvancED3

Activity: Internal Review What are the benefits of Internal Review? © 2013 AdvancED4

AdvancED Standards for Quality Systems © 2013 AdvancED5

Standards  Statements (5)  Indicators (35) – Focus of internal review – Rated individually – Contain multiple concepts  Evidence (multiple sources)  Performance Rubrics – Four levels – No longer labeled © 2013 AdvancED6

New Protocol: Characteristics of Evidence  Quality Matters – If the quality of evidence is high, it provides value to the accreditation process  Results Matter – High performance and improving performance results are critical factors for an institution’s success – The new protocol is a performance-based system Quality Results © 2013 AdvancED7

Standards Review  Each building will complete a review of the standards and provide: – A building rating by indicator – Examples of evidence

Activity: Performance Levels 1.Turn to indicator Read the four performance levels 3.What words/phrases differentiate each level? © 2013 AdvancED9

Activity: Ratings & Evidence 1.Turn to Indicator 3.3 Concept Map 2.Discuss – How might this help your system determine the most accurate rating? – What other benefits are there to this version of the Self Assessment Workbook? – What evidence would your system have to support your rating? © 2013 AdvancED11

Activity: Standards Review 1.Join your expert group – 6 Per building – (2 for Standard 3) 2.Rate indicators – descriptive targets Determine performance level (4 point scale) – based on the statements from the concept map Identify supporting evidence 3.Identify strengths relative to the standard 4.Identify challenges relative to the standard © 2013 AdvancED12

Building Standard Summary  For each Standard Provide:  Short description of the indicator ratings – Strengths – Challenges

All schools should complete internal reviews long before the External Review so the system can adequately analyze the data. Complete Internal Review and submit all systems diagnostic results with evidence at least 4 weeks prior to External Review! Important Deadline © 2013 AdvancED14

AdvancED Key Resources Login, register, tour! – AdvancED Staff – Printed Resources – Electronic Resources © 2013 AdvancED15

Thank You! We believe in the power of education to shape the world in which we live. Thank you for believing, too! © 2013 AdvancED16

Find Us! 17 © 2013 AdvancED