National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Egypt Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture Image.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ministry of Public Sector Development Public Sector Development Program Better Government Delivering Better Result.
Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Armenia
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Awareness and Education About the BTWC Professor Malcolm Dando University of Bradford UK.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Ukraine Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Harmonization of Information Management and Reporting for Biodiversity- Related Treaties Vijay Samnotra, UNEP Espoo, Finland, July 2-4, 2003.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
The Obligations Built into the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) Lecture No. 12 Further Inf. For further information please click on the right.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19.
The First Intersessional Process of the BTWC 2003 – 2005 Lecture No. 9 Further Inf. For further information please click on the right buttons in the following.
National Implementation Legislation Lecture No. 20 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the following.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
Overview of the Lectures in the Education Module Resource Lecture No. 1.
The New Inter-Sessional Process of the BTWC 2007 – 2010 Lecture No. 10.
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
CHAPTER 2 – ROLES OF CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL IN SAFETY AND HEALTH
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Kyrgyzstan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
O PERATING A BSL-3 F ACILITY IN K OREA T HE IVI E XPERIENCE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ANTICIPATING BIOSECURITY CHALLENGES OF THE GLOBAL EXPANSION OF HIGH.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Georgia Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
The Quality Management System
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Saudi Arabia Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Central Asia Regional Health Security Workshop Co-organized with the Command Surgeon, US Central Command and the George C. Marshall European Center for.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Tunisia Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard CWA 15793:2008
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Biosafety and Biosecurity Challenges in the Caribbean Region Valerie Wilson Caribbean Med Labs Foundation Anticipating Global Biosecurity Challenges Istanbul,
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Tajikistan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Algeria Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Pakistan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
DPG HEALTH MEETING USAID CONFERENCE ROOM 6 NOVEMBER 2013 International Health Regulation (2005)
Responsible Stewardship: Choices and Challenges in Preventing the Malign Use of the Life Sciences Brian Rappert.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Excellence in science The Royal Society is the independent scientific academy of the UK dedicated to promoting excellence in science. Royal Society’s work.
Safety organization and training. The biosafety officer and biosafety committee A safety policy, A safety manual, and Supporting programmes for their.
CAPSCA Europe workshop, Paris, France, September 2011 Legislative aspects for IHR implementation at airports Thomas Hofmann Division of Communicable.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Country Name Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
Environmental Management System Definitions
World Health Organization Life science research: opportunities and risks for public health Ottorino Cosivi Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Jordan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture Image.
Office of the President Office of the Chief of Staff Secretariat of Environment and Sustainable Development.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
National Series Lecture 4. National Measures Azerbaijan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
1 PRESENTATION TO JOINT RULES COMMITTEE ON THE OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL 19 MARCH 2008.
1 Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) Ratification by Parliament PCD&MV 11 November 2014.
WHO / World Bank videoconference 19 September 2008
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
ASDPE International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) Laboratory and Zoonosis update Dr Richard Brown, WHO Thailand Workshop on Laboratory Diagnosis for Zoonotic.
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Kazakhstan Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture.
SOLGM Wanaka Retreat Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 Ready? 4 February 2016 Samantha Turner Partner DDI: Mob:
Biosecurity. Basic Terminology Basic Terminology BIOSAFETY: unintentional exposureaccidental release Describes the containment principles, technologies.
Capacity Building for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety by the German Development Co-operation: German Federal Ministry for Economic.
Ratification of BWC BWC Expert Group, Republic of Korea Compendium of National Activities in Korea: Measures to Improve Biosafety and Biosecurity Hei Chan.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
T Mr.Willy Musinguzi, EAC. .Overview of EAC SQMT Infrastructure How EAC standards are Harmonized and Implemented How EAC Quality Infrastructure relates.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
Trade Union Training on the Validation of the training manual entitled “Union Training on Occupational Safety and Health” OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH:
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
IHR: the framework for preparedness and response
The EAC Quality Infrastructure and WTO TBT Agreement.
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Presentation transcript:

National Series Lecture 4 National Measures Egypt Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Division of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, UK Picture Image Transparent Globe by digitalart - from:

Outline Public health –WHO Biosafety/Biosecurity Guidelines (2004) –International Health Regulations (2005) –Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard (2008) Arms control –BTWC (1972) –Chemical Weapons Convention (1993) Engagement of life scientists –Oversight –Codes of conduct –Education

National implementation 1 International agreement 2 Signature and ratification by states 3 National measures in states Legislation, regulation order or other forms

1. Public health Picture Image :Protect Heart by digitalart - from:

Laboratory measures Objective The WHO Laboratory Biosafety Manual is a helpful reference for states that accept the challenge to develop and establish national codes of practice for securing their microbiological assets, yet ensuring their availability for clinical, research and epidemiological purposes. Codes of practice = a codified list [or guideline or standard of required] of essential safety practices and procedures. (WHO 2004)

Biosafety level (BSL) 1-2 Access –Authorizing access, hazard signs, and gates/doors closed Personal protection –Uniforms (coveralls, glasses, and footwear), washing hands Procedures –No pipetting by mouth, limited and written procedures for clean- up, and procedures minimizing the formation of aerosols and droplets Laboratory working areas – keeping neat, clean and free of potentially dangerous material at the end of the working day Biosafety management –This is the responsibility of the laboratory director –Training, evaluation, surveillance and treatment should be provided when necessary Laboratory measures

Biosafety level (BSL) 3 BSL 1-2 applies except where modified as follows: Biohazard symbol must include the name of the laboratory supervisor Laboratory protective clothing upgrade Open manipulations of all potentially infectious material contained Respiratory protective equipment may be necessary Biosafety level (BSL) 4 BSL 3 applies except where modified as follows: The two-person rule should apply, whereby no individual ever works alone A complete change of clothing and shoes is required prior to entering the laboratory Personnel must be trained in emergency extraction procedures A method of communication for routine and emergency contacts Laboratory measures

Egyptian Biological Safety Association (EGBSA) EGBSA has been closely working with the African Biological Safety Association (AFBSA) EGBSA has also been working with US Sandia National Laboratory and US Biosecurity Engagement Program (BEP) on laboratory biosafety and security capacity building for life scientists. (Sandia National Laboratories 2007) Laboratory measures

Exercise 1 Laboratory safety/security: whose responsibility? Who should be responsible for laboratory safety and security measures (scientists, PI, managers of the institutions or government)?. How should such processes be implemented? Read the document (the case of Thomas Bulter - Texas Tech University ) and report to the class (10 min).

Is physical protection enough for laboratory safety and security? Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard (CWA-15793:2008) Flexible risk assessment approach = not based on an assumed static level of risk agents but situational Timing and scope – when to review practices? (e.g.) –Commencement of new work or changes to the programme of work including the introduction of new biological agents –New construction / modifications to laboratories, plant and equipment or its operation; –When considering emergency response and contingency planning requirements; Laboratory measures

Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard (CWA-15793:2008) Highlighting the role of the top manager “Top management shall take ultimate responsibility for the organization’s biorisk management system.” Top management includes Officers (Director General, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, etc.) and Directors of the organization.

Laboratory measures Laboratory Biorisk Management Standard (CWA-15793:2008) Planning for hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control Identifying roles, responsibilities and authorities of actors Personnel training, awareness and competence Operational control (physical and technical procedures) Emergency response and contingency plans = Wider than the physical protection of agents and toxins Each element is detailed and instructions provided in the document

Public health measures The stated purpose of the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 are: "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.” (WHO 2012a) “3 top priorities of the IHR” (WHO 2012) - States should: Establish a functioning National IHR Focal Point Ensure adherence to reporting requirements and verification of public health events. Assess and strengthen national capacities

8 Core capacities required of States: 1.National legislation, policy and financing, 2.Coordination and NFP communications, 3.Surveillance, 4.Response, 5.Preparedness, 6.Risk communication, 7.Human resource, and 8.Laboratory. See Checklist and Indicators for Monitoring Progress in the Development of IHR Core Capacities in States Parties (WHO/HSE/IHR/ Rev.1) Public health measures (IHR)

Concern The IHRs do not have an enforcement mechanism (no teeth!) against non-compliance Rationale Non-compliance risks run by States: – tarnished international image – increased morbidity/mortality of affected populations, – unilateral travel and trade restrictions – economic and social disruption and – public outrage (WHO 2012b) Public health measures (IHR)

Egypt Egypt is a party to International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR). Several activities have been done to facilitate the implementation of the regulations in the country including: Identification of a national official responsible for IHR Coordination and collaboration with different ministries and organizations to implement the IHR Training courses and workshops for health-care providers, including quarantine staff, to raise competence Assessment of capacity and surveillance preparedness at different sites in order to comply the regulations. An action plan has been prepared for implementation of surveillance and response in governorates as well as a contingency plan. Modification of some national regulations and legal procedures has been introduced in order to comply with IHR. (WHO 2012c) Public health measures (IHR)

2. Arms control

National implementation of an international legal agreement Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Article IV “Each State Party to this Convention shall, in accordance with its constitutional processes, take any necessary measures to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition, or retention of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment and means of delivery specified in article I of the Convention.” Chemical Weapons Convention Article VII “Each State Party shall, in accordance with its constitutional processes, adopt the necessary measures to implement its obligations under this Convention.”

Case of the BTWC – options for States Existing national regulations are enough to achieve the scope of the BTWC and no further legislation is necessary Certain amendments of existing laws and regulations are necessary An act is newly enacted specifically for the BTWC, and Broader legislation is enacted not only for the BTWC but generally for anti-terrorism acts (ROK 2003) “in accordance with its constitutional process” = No one size fits all National implementation of an international legal agreement

Egypt BTWC (Signatory) –Although Egypt is a signatory state of the BTWC and not ratified the Convention yet, it has several national laws and regulations for the prohibition of biological weapons through penal and anti- terrorism codes. (VERTIC 2012) Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) (not a member of the CWC) –No legislation is registered with the CWC website. (OPCW) National implementation of an international legal agreement

BTWC: Egypt’s Submission of Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) Table was created based on the database of the UNOG As Egypt is a signatory state to the BTWC and not ratified the Convention yet, there has been no submission of the CBMs

Evolution of the BTWC: strengthening national measures (AHG) Major threat State offensive programmes Security approach Compliance (Organization, verification) / (ISP) Major threat Primarily non-state level Terrorism, crimes Security measures – a national approach Legislation, laboratory measures, codes, oversight, public health (e.g. surveillance)

From a traditional disarmament regime to a security architecture / Extending threat spectrum > Manmade, safety and natural threats/risks = All hazard approach Institutional evolution > terrorism, crime and public health sectors (e.g. UNSCR1540, Interpol, WHO, OIE, FAO, IFBA) Evolution of the BTWC: strengthening national measures

Exercise2 Are legal obligations sufficient to ensure an effective security culture? Discuss what kind of other national measures (in parallel to laboratory security/safety at institutions and legal obligations) should or could be developed in order to prevent the misuse of the life sciences in society What kind of other social actors can play a biosecurity role? (10 min) Report to the class

3. Engagement of life scientists Picture Image Business Team With Puzzle by digitalart - from:

Committee Holding interdisciplinary discussions on the definition of risks, biosecurity measures and strategic recommendations for policy development in biosecurity Advisory board Providing guidelines for the oversight of scientific research, laboratory management measures, and awareness raising of scientists. A possible policy process for oversight E.g. USA - The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Israel - Steering Committee on Issues in Biotechnological Research in the Age of Terrorism Oversight of Research

Codes of Conduct InterAcademy Panel (IAP) Statement on Biosecurity (2005) –Endorsed by over 60 national science academies –Defines five fundamental policies: 1.Awareness; 2.Safety and security; 3.Education and information; 4.Accountability; 5.Oversight. National example –Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (2005) A Code of Conduct for Biosecurity –Indonesian Academy of Sciences (forthcoming) (Sudoyo 2011)

A national biosecurity dual-use action plan model 1.Identify what is currently taught (a survey) 2.Develop a network of interested lecturers 3.Develop appropriate content for courses 4.Implement pilot courses 5.Monitor and evaluate pilot courses 6.Identify and elucidate best practice 7.Institute clear, active links between industrial partners/associates, defence agencies and academic institutions teaching biosecurity 8.Develop or participate in an international network to share best practice 9.Make dual-use/biosecurity education mandatory 10.Monitor consequential growth of sensible codes and oversight systems 11.Report on progress to BTWC and relevant scientific meetings Education: a national action plan

Structural Individual AutonomousLegal 1. Developing an educational resource for codes of conduct; 2. Developing capacity building programmes 3. Changing evaluation criteria of funding bodies or review criteria of scientific journals 4. Changing evaluation criteria on higher education institutions 5. Establishing a national advisory board 6. Legislating a biosecurity act Education: a national action plan

National measures: Areas of possible improvement Egypt Laboratory safety measures –Efforts have been made and need to continue alongside development of a biosecurity framework National legislation of the BTWC –Ratification of the BTWC should be urgently considered, –Signature and ratification to the CWC should be urgently considered. Education and Codes of Conduct –Implementation of the survey and the development of a national code of conduct for biosecurity will strengthen efforts

References The references cited in this presentation may be found in the Notes section of this slide.