Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Affirmative Action? 1961 – President Kennedy implements affirmative action executive orders directing federal agencies to pursue a policy of minority.
Advertisements

1 11. Government Response to Social and Economic Inequality - Affirmative Action Learning Intentions (Pupils should be able to): 1.Explain what is meant.
1 Affirmative Action. 2 John F. Kennedy: Executive Order (1961) Used affirmative action for the first time by instructing federal contractors to.
Jessie Hauser. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke “ This landmark Supreme Court case imposed limitations on affirmative action to ensure.
Civil Rights in the Courts
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Rights
Affirmative Action. DISCLAIMER This presentation does not imply any racial agenda or discrimination. The views that are going to be presented in this.
Employment Relationships and Discrimination 2 Dr. Pamela Gershuny.
Affirmative Action in Higher Education A Case Study of the Effects the Courts Have Had on the Admissions Processes of Higher Education Institutions.
HC #5 Consequences of the Civil Rights Movement Affirmative Action & Forced Busing.
Challenges for Civil Liberties
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential practices should be used in hiring.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential hiring practices should be used in hiring.
Affirmative Action and Employment Equity March 18, 2002.
Civil Rights Refers to government-protected rights of individuals against arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by governments or individuals based on.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
Making Diversity Count: A teaching approach using legal decisions related to diversity Chester Spell Rutgers University August 2015.
1 Government Response to Social and Economic Inequality - Affirmative Action.
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. REFERENDUM RESULTS BACKGROUND For the past half century, one of the primary tools for addressing racial, ethnic, and gender inequality.
Women’s Liberation, Free Speech, Environmentalism, and the New Left.
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder ’ s American Government C H A P T E R 21 Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law.
Affirmative Action Chapter 6, Theme C. Affirmative Action Solution  Define it!  What are the two views of the practice?  Compensatory action (helping.
Reading #5: Consequences of the Civil Rights Movement - Affirmative Action & Forced Busing.
Civil Liberties Challenges
Affirmative Action reading: The Shape of the River, Bowen and Bok.
Do Families Play an Important Role in Explaining Racial Inequality? Positive Effects of Families –Colin Powell –Oprah Winfrey –Shorris: role of families.
Chapter 4 Civil rights. The Civil Rights Struggle: After the Civil War, African Americans routinely faced discrimination, or unfair treatment based on.
Affirmative Action Debate 2009 Topic: A pro and a con position on the question of affirmative action as a tool for making college admission decisions will.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. Agenda Affirmative Action power point Definition of Affirmative Action Pro-Affirmative Action Con-Affirmative action Affirmative Action.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Affirmative Action Has there been a move away from Affirmative Action in Recent Years?
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
Beth Gottman Kelly Lynch Jill Malie
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
Point systems – Affirmative action Thomas R. Stewart, Ph.D. Center for Policy Research Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany.
By: Maggie Dwyer, Allison Henry, and Ann Novelli.
Civil Rights Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights.
Goal 5.06A “The Civil Rights Struggle” I: Struggle for Rights A: Discrimination= unfair treatment based on prejudice against a certain group. B: Civil.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
L EGAL I SSUES IN H IGHER E DUCATION : T HE S TUDENTS LS 517 Admissions & Diversity.
Chapter 4 Civil rights. The Civil Rights Struggle: After the Civil War, African Americans routinely faced discrimination, or unfair treatment based on.
U.S. History Unit 7 Terms #1-13 Civil Rights. What are Civil Rights? Civil Rights refer to the positive acts a government takes to protect us against.
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. Equality Does the Constitution guarantee equality? NO – only equal protection of the law (14 th Amendment) Traditionally – we.
Chapter 5 Civil Rights.
Chapter 4 Civil rights.
Affirmative Action Provided to the Pompton Lakes Public School Staff
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Civil Rights Ch. 4.4.
Unit 7: The Judicial Branch, Civil Liberties, and Civil Rights
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Civil Rights.
Group Six Will Mason Tracy Epton Maile Kobayashi Susan Redick
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Team 3: Elizabeth, Dan, Courtney, Jonathan, Brittany, and Sarah
Civil Rights.
Key Ch. 5 Vocabulary Review – AP Government
Civil Rights 10/8/07.
Affirmative Action.
Bryan Dee Graham Fuller Adam Nims Andrea Stoddard Greg Baumer
The Civil Rights Struggle
Topic 6 – Role of the people
Civil Rights.
Civil Rights: protection of citizens by government
Presentation transcript:

Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded.” Source: Fullinwider, /entries/affirmative-action/

Affirmative Action Timeline President Kennedy issued Executive Order that mandates federally funded projects to take “affirmative practices to ensure employment practices are free of bias.” President Johnson prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, or national origin through the Civil Rights Act President Johnson amends EO to address discrimination based on gender.

Affirmative Action Timeline President Nixon via Philadelphia Order discourages quotas, but requires contractors to demonstrate affirmative action to increase minority employment The University of California v. Bakke landmark Supreme Court case on reverse discrimination. 1980s & early 1990s - various court cases regarding affirmative action and hiring/termination practices in business and education.

Affirmative Action Timeline President Clinton supports policy of “mend it, don’t end it.” Hopwood v. University of Texas Law School, the 5th U.S. Court of Appeals suspended the university’s affirmative action admissions program and Bakke ruled invalid Proposition 209 (CA) banned all forms of affirmative action in California (no AA and no discrimination).

Affirmative Action Timeline Washington state passed Initiative 200 (similar to Proposition 209 in California) Florida bans race as factor in college admissions; University of Michigan’s undergrad AA policy upheld by federal judge Different judge’s opposite ruling in University of Michigan’s case (decision reversed in 2002 on appeal) Supreme Court upholds University of Michigan’s AA because, “it furthers a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.”