Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs 2009-2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 26, No door-to-door recruitment per DESE Ensure you are in compliance with the DESE marketing practices No posting of Provider information.
Advertisements

WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
1 Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Building Productive Relationships with Approved Providers and Developing SES Student Learning Plans that Maximize.
NCLB Monitoring Cycle 1 Policies and Procedures. Letter  Explains monitoring process  Lists required documentation  Lists activities  Directions for.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (SES) 1.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) October 6, 2011 Title I Technical Assistance Session Ken Klau & Erica Adametz.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Title I Supplemental Educational Service Training September 19, 2012 The main purpose of supplemental educational services is to: increase the academic.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
WEE District Plans Writing, Updating and CDE Approval Updated 10/2009.
Chapter 222 of the Acts of 2012, An Act Relative to Students Access to Educational Services and Exclusion from School.
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
ACADEMIC SERVICES DIVISION. ACADEMIC SERVICES In other words, Chapters 4, 5, and 6 of your charter.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Data Collection Process: Roles and Responsibilities of LEAs GaDOE Data Collections Conference August 17, 2011 Athens,
ANNUAL EVALUATION PLAN Schoolwide Programs. Annual Evaluation Plan.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
SES Overview Supplemental Education Services. What is SES? Additional academic instruction that is provided outside of the regular school day Designed.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Presented by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
CIP UPDATES Sec. VI Parental Involvement Paula Reese Division of Federal and Special Programs Mobile County Public School System.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 The “F” Grade And Probations, Suspensions, Walk Aways, and other useful Information.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Welcome! The webinar will begin at 3:30 p.m.. Title III Program Monitoring Tier I, Tier II, & Tier III and BAAS Documentation February 6, 2014 North Carolina.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
Chair: Steven M. Ross, Center for Research in Educational Policy; Center on Innovation & Improvement Collaborating Researchers: Jen Harmon, Center on Innovation.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Administrative Review Requirements
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs

Overview Monitoring SES providers Evaluating SES programs Questions

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) The SEA is required to monitor the quality and effectiveness of the services offered by approved Supplemental Educational Services (SES) providers. ESEA, Section 1116(e)(4)(D); 34 C.F.R. §200.47(c).

SBE Policy On September 30, 2009, the SBE approved the Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Evaluation Policy.

Monitoring SES Providers

Purpose of Monitoring Address requirements of SES providers as stipulated in ESEA; and Verify compliance with narratives and assurances in the SES provider’s approved application.

Indicators Program Management Instructional Program Parent Communication Health, Safety and Civil Rights Laws District Agreement Online Provider Requirements (when applicable)

Monitoring Visit On-site visit Documentation review Observation of tutoring session Interview with tutor(s)

Prior to the Visit At least five (5) days prior to the on-site monitoring visit, a Title I Consultant will: Notify the LEA Federal Programs director and/or the LEA’s SES coordinator by of the upcoming visit with specific information related to location, date, and time; and Invite an LEA observer to accompany the SES monitor (not required).

During the Visit Documentation Observation Interview

Documentation Examples Student enrollment records including students with disabilities and limited English proficient students Student attendance records Student learning plans Student materials

Observation Examples Start/stop times Tutor interactions with students Student engagement Classroom management Procedures to ensure health/safety of students

Interview Tutors Site coordinators Other provider representative if available

After the Visit Monitoring report Provider response

Monitoring Report Identifies indicator(s) rated as “not met” Describes any required action(s) Report ed to the SES provider and the LEA

Provider Response Providers have ten (10) business days to respond to any required action(s) as noted in the monitoring report.

Provider Response Address findings for any indicator(s) determined to be “not met” Description of required action(s) included in the monitoring report Documentation and/or descriptions required for required action(s)

Monitoring At-a-Glance Notify LEA 5 days prior to visit Conduct on-site review during tutoring session – Review documents – Observe tutoring session – Interview tutors/coordinators Monitoring report to providers and LEA Provider submits plan to DPI for addressing findings within 10 business days of the receipt of the report

Evaluating SES Provider

Provider Evaluation SEA must establish procedures for withdrawing approval from SES providers that fail for 2 consecutive years to demonstrate effectiveness.

SBE Policy Criteria Student achievement Parental satisfaction Student attendance

Student Achievement Assessment results Pre and post assessment Measure of “effect size” of all students in a provider’s program Results submitted to SEA in January and May

Parental Satisfaction Survey All parents of students within a providers program statewide Disseminated, collected, and submitted by LEA

Student Attendance Hours offered vs. hours attended All students within each provider’s program statewide

Weighted Criteria Student achievement = 50% Parental satisfaction = 25% Student attendance = 25% Minimum rating of 75% to continue in Good Standing

Provider Status Good Standing = 75% or above Probationary = less than 75% Good Standing/Probationary With Reservations = – Compliance issues with Federal or State requirements – 3 formal complaints

With Reservation Providers assigned any status “with reservation” – Must address the identified areas for improvement in the next SES reporting period (i.e., semester).

Provider Removal 2 consecutive years of Probationary Status Recommended removal to SBE SBE makes final determination

“Emergency” Clause SBE may immediately remove or suspend services if it is determined there are: – Health or safety issues; – Illegal or deceptive practices; – Violation of an assurance or other aspect of the approved plan; – Provision of falsified information; or – Violations of State or Federal law.

Corrective Action A provider may be placed under “corrective action” if unresolved compliance issues are raised through NCDPI’s monitoring.

Corrective Action A corrective action plan must be submitted within 30 days of the notification detailing how the provider intends to improve the deficiencies in its program.

Corrective Action Removal from the state approved list if it fails to meet the requirements of its corrective action plan by the end of the SES reporting period following the provider’s placement into “corrective action.”

Provider Removal Any provider removed from the State-approved list for any reason is ineligible to re-apply for the following two (2) fiscal years.

Provider Removal Corrective action or termination of approval may be exercised solely with respect to the provider’s program in one or more schools or districts if issues are localized.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there restrictions regarding who the LEA can assign as “the Director of SES?” No, that is a local decision.

Are there any restrictions on how providers may recruit classroom teachers to be SES tutors? Yes, all local policies must be adhered to when recruiting teachers.

May an LEA require criminal background checks for SES providers based on local policies? Yes

May providers amend their program information? Providers may not amend their application during the current year of approval. Providers may not add grade levels nor make other program changes.

What are some examples of Parent Outreach Activities? Contact PIRC for ideas Ms. Beverly Roberts

When will the application be posted? The application is expected to be posted in January.

Will current providers have to submit a new application next year? Current SES providers will complete a modified application to continue to be a provider in primarily to update current approved applications.

How can I obtain a copy of the SES Standards and Procedures handbook? The handbook is available at

SES Start Date SES Tutoring should begin by November 9, 2009.

Minimum Hours North Carolina requires providers to offer a minimum of a 30-hour program. Up to two hours of assessment may be included within the 30 hours.

Hourly Rate Providers may not charge a higher hourly rate than the student cap can support. Providers bill for every hour that the student attends.