11 IAEA 56 th General Conference Senior Regulators’ meeting The French doctrine for the management of the Post-Accident Nuclear Situation André-Claude.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2014 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development CRPPH Contributions to Stakeholder Involvement Dr. Michael Siemann, Dr. Ted Lazo Radiation.
Advertisements

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Planned reference and intervention levels in Finland Raimo Mustonen,
S T U K S Ä T E I L Y T U R V A K E S K U S S T R Å L S Ä K E R H E T S C E N T R A L E N R A D I A T I O N A N D N U C L E A R S A F E T Y A U T H O R.
Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective Michael Binder President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Presentation to the.
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency CS-81 to prepare a work plan and material for developing a guidance on management of large amounts of radioactive.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
GEOSAF-Meeting F. Boissier, S. Voinis, S. Barlow Operational Safety- IGSC Expert Group on Operational Safety (EG-OS) DMR/DIR/ May 2014, Vienna.
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Institutional framework for supporting civil society development in Croatia A PLAN C FOR EUROPE: CITIZENSHIP, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, CIVIL DIALOGUE 17 September.
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic Aysel Hasanova, Akbar Guliyev, Emin Mansurov Regional Workshop - School for Drafting.
Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
JRC Information Day – May 11, 2006, Bucharest 1 Valică GOREA President of Nuclear Agency GOVERNMENT of ROMANIA Romanian Nuclear Programme Medium and Long.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Legislation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Thailand’s Preparation for Starting a Nuclear Power Program Mr. Pricha Karasuddhi Technical Advisor Nuclear Power Program Development Office(NPPDO) Ministry.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Republic.
LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
EU Basic Safety Directive 2013/59/Euratom TRAINING COURSE ON TECHNICAAL REQUIREMENTS TO FULFILL NATIONAL OBLIGATIONS FOR THE SAFE MANAGEMENT OF DSRS.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards and Public Exposure to Radon Trevor Boal Radiation Protection Unit - NSRW.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
„ZONE 2010“ Opening Exercise Col. Eng. Ivan Koleňák MoI-Directorate General of the Fire Rescue Service of the Czech Republic.
DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE BASE NECESSARY FOR TSO.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Revision of the International Basic Safety Standards - BSS Status Report - Renate Czarwinski & Pascal Deboodt.
Stakeholder Views on the Implementation of Food and Agricultural Protective Actions in Ireland following a Nuclear Accident Abroad Veronica Smith, Catherine.
Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Observations and Lessons from OECD/NEA Activities in Stakeholder Involvement Summary of Experience from the NEA Committee on Radiation Protection and.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Transposition of Requirements set out in the Basic Safety Standards for Nuclear Facilities in Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS Albinas MASTAUSKAS Radiation.
Office of Legal Affairs
THE ROLE OF TSOs IN THE NATIONAL SAFETY ORGANIZATION
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Radiation & Nuclear Safety and Security Aspects in Lao PDR
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
WENRA Current activities of WENRA 4th GNSSN Steering Committee Meeting
Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation 04, Feb. – 08, Feb.
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
Leadership and Management for Safety
Prof. Lalko Dulevski President of the ESC of Bulgaria
Prof. Lalko Dulevski President of the ESC of Bulgaria
Training and Tutoring Approaches in the Field of Radiation Safety
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR DISASTERS
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Radiation safety in Lithuania
Presentation transcript:

11 IAEA 56 th General Conference Senior Regulators’ meeting The French doctrine for the management of the Post-Accident Nuclear Situation André-Claude Lacoste ASN 2012, September 20th, Vienna. 1.The CODIRPA works 2.The French doctrine : objectives, principles and key points 3.The PA zoning 4.CODIRPA development (new tasks)

22 The Prime Minister Directive, 7 April 2005 ASN is responsible for “establishing the framework, for defining, preparing and implementing the steps necessary to deal with a post-accident situation” CODIRPA Composition National and local administrations Expert bodies Operators and associations Foreign radiation protection authorities (Germany, Switzerland, Luxemburg) 12 thematic working groups : 12 thematic working groups : foodstuffs, drinking water, health surveillance, waste, radioactivity measurements, intervention in contaminated areas, compensation, regulation, information, culture … 2 “transversal commissions” 2 “transversal commissions” (transition and long term periods) Test of the doctrine at local level (3 NPP sites and 9 local communities) Almost 300 associated people involved (institutional and civil society) The CODIRPA works ( )

33 Transparency of the projects Transparency of the projects (  The 12 technical reports of the thematic groups ;  The draft guide for the termination of the emergency phase, subject to testing (2010) ;  The elements of th national doctrine (Oct. 2012) International outreach  2 international seminars in Paris (Dec and May 2011) A doctrine grouping together (short time release) :  Main document (15 pages) : objectives, principles, key actions and strategic orientations for the transition and long term phases.  Annex 1 : The first actions to be put in place at the end of the emergency phase  Annex 2 : The guidelines for managing the transition phase (few months).  Annex 3 : The guidelines for managing the long-term phases (several years) Approval by CODIRPA in June 2012, followed by publication ( The CODIRPA works ( )

44 3 fundamental objectives (strongly connected) To protect the population against the dangers of ionising radiations ; To provide support for members of the population who have suffered the consequences of an accident ; To prepare the social and economic recovery of the affected areas. 4 principles (very closed to ICRP 103 and 111)  Principle 1 (Anticipation): issues relating to nuclear post-accident management must be taken into account immediately once the emergency phase is over, consequently the first actions for the protection of the population must be planned in advance.  Principle 2 (Justification)  Principle 3 (Optimisation)  Principle 4 (“Co-construction and transparency”) : the management of post- accidental situation must involved the population, the elected people, the social economic and “communication” actors ; transparency of information is a corollary. The CODIRPA doctrine : Objectives, principles and key points The CODIRPA doctrine : Objectives, principles and key points

55 5 Key points The immediate delineation of a PA zoning for the contaminated area, with an evolution during the transition phase. The efficient organisation of medical and psychological care, human radiation monitoring, financial support and compensation for those affected by the consequences of the accident. The permanent radiological characterisation of the environment, foodstuffs and drinking water. The emergence of new forms of governance based on the vigilance and active participation of the population concerned, a key point for economic recovery within affected areas. A sustainable waste management in response of the rapid increase of diverse kinds of contaminated waste. The CODIRPA doctrine : Objectives, principles and key points The CODIRPA doctrine : Objectives, principles and key points

66 Immediate delineation of a PA zoning for the contaminated areas provides the structural framework (short time release) : for initial protection measures : –to decide about long term evacuation and relocation (after sheltering during the early phase) ; –to ban the sale and the consumption of locally produced foodstuffs ; –to engage the first clean-up operations within urban areas. for the organisation of medical and psychological care, human radiation monitoring, financial support and compensation : –opening information centres for the populations affected. for the radiological characterisation of : –the environment, foodstuffs and drinking water ; –the waste and manufactured product ; as well as for preparing the economic recovery of contaminated areas in transition period. The main goals of PA zoning

77 Area for the control of foodstuffs (ZST) Protection Zone of Population (ZPP) Protection Zone of Population (ZPP) Relocation area An area for the protection of the population (ZPP), based on dose criteria ; preliminary actions : Prohibition of trade and consumption of foodstuffs ; Starting cleaning actions (urban areas) ; … If needed, including a relocation Area (an exclusion area within ZPP depending of the level of external exposure). An area for the control of foodstuffs (ZST), based on MPL (Euratom) Immediately : prohibition of trade and consumption Strategy for « clearance » control PA zoning : 2 ou 3 areas, depending of the accident

88 Dose criteria for the delineation of the ZPP (Protection of population) :  Effective dose / 1st month : 10 mSv ; Equivalent dose Thyroid : 50 mSv. considering both external exposure (ground contamination) and internal exposure due to the “possible” consumption of contaminated foodstuffs (even if the consumption will be prohibited). Dose criteria for the delineation of the “relocation area” : effective dose 10 mSv/1st month considering only external exposure. Dose criteria for the 1st delineation of the PA zoning Which data ? At the end of the emergency phase, a predictive estimation (modelling) should be provided by IRSN ; The evolution of the PA zoning during the transition period will take into account the results of the radiological monitoring of environment.

99 To regularly analyze feedback experience from To regularly analyze feedback experience from : the Chernobyl accident (long term) ; the Fukushima accident (long time release, transition period). To support preparedness works at local and national levels : The preparedness of the PA preliminary actions on each NPP sites The “road maps” for ministries (Civil security, Public Health, Agriculture, Environment, Industry, Economy, Education…), To further develop certain topics : the social acceptance of low contaminated foodstuff ; the cost of PA ; the gradual commitment of stakeholders in “real” circumstances ; the contamination of water resources, of the sea ; the radiation protection culture ; the control of manufactured product. To transfer the doctrine to all those involved, in particular economic players, elected people and opinion leaders Experimental projects To exchange with neighboring countries and international organizations (HERCA, AIEA, WHO, NEA,...). The new tasks for CODIRPA ( )