Effective Leadership at the Top IPAC - September 29th, 2005 Dr. François Ducharme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Advertisements

Organizational Teams Chapter 12. Overview n Preponderance of Teams n Organizational Small Groups n Characteristics of Groups n Relational Communication.
Situational Leadership Donna Shea, M.Ed.. Objectives By the end of this presentation you should be able to: Discuss the four leadership styles Discuss.
How to Enhance Personal Productivity By Janet Hadley
Job Analysis-Based Performance Appraisals
Key Points (Mallory, 1991)  To solve problems by drawing on the talents of variety of individuals.  To foster togetherness in the workplace while.
Power Teams - The Essence of PM Practice. What Makes a Great Team? J. Richard Hackman, Harvard As applies to Project Management Leadership by Linda Clark-Borre,
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
1 Social Intelligence “The ability to determine the requirement for leadership in a particular situation and select an appropriate response” Behavioural.
Chapter Learning Objectives
Leadership Development Nova Scotia Public Service
Performance Management
Introduction to Team Building Presented by Margo Elliott Momentum Performance Solutions 6 September 2001.
The Manager as Leader 3.1 The Importance of Leadership
Practicing Emotional Intelligence in the Public Sector IPMA-HR Western Region Conference May 3, 2006 IPMA-HR Western Region Conference May 3, 2006.
Teamwork 101.
TEAMWORK CULTURE LE HOANG NHAN VO NGOC THANH THAO LE THU QUAN NGUYEN LE BUU TAM.
Chapter Nine Developing Teamwork
Foundations of Leadership Studies
Chapter 9: Teams and Teamwork
NVSC LtCol J. D. Fleming 21 October 2014.
Leaders and Leadership
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
Defining Leadership.
Passionate about developing people Performance Management Maureen Scholefield Managing Director.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Project Audit and Closure
Develop your Leadership skills
AugusBoth checks were cut the was cut on1/16 and the other one for was cut yesterday, both went out yesterday Marybeth Tahar Interaction.
Putting it all together..
Understanding Work Teams
SOCIAL AWARENESS... PRESENTATION BY: RITIKA NAIR.
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
R ESTAURANT M ANAGEMENT (HM 432) CHAPTER 2 Teamwork in the Food Service and Hospitality Workplace.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
TEAMWORK Training the Programme Developers. Teamwork: why do we need it? Responsibility, potential and delegation Your optimal potential Resposibility.
 Is there a difference between working as a group and working as a team? Why or why not? What is the difference?
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
How Does Work Climate Affect Performance?
Introduction of Teams: Team Norming and Culture Jaron L. Jones.
Group and Team What Is Group What Is Group Group: “Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular goal.”
TEAM DEVELOPMENT Prepared by Clay Bassham, Jeanie Long.
MADE BY: Shalini Prakash….(018) Monisha Gautam..(026)
Leadership Lecture 11.
Leadership. After reading this chapter, you should be able to: 1 Differentiate between leadership and management. 2 Describe how leaders are able to influence.
Fundamentals of Public Administration MPA FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood ,
FINAL PRESENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR AND ANALYSIS Prepared for : Dr. S. Kumar Group : Dollar 2 A. R. S. BANDARA - PGIA / 06 / 6317 B. A. G. K.
Teams Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
Welcome.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.5-1 Chapter 5 Ethical Decision Making and Ethical Leadership.
11 Leadership Styles Theory X assumes employees dislike work and attempt to avoid it Theory Y assumes employees view work as being natural and employees.
Lim Sei cK.  Team ◦ A group whose members work intensely with each other to achieve a specific, common goal or objective. ◦ All teams are groups.
Step up to Action. Levels of Partnership Level 4 - Assimilation Level 3 - Adapting Level 2 - Joint Projects Level - 1 Networking.
Group Dynamics and Teamwork February 28, 2012 MGMT 4000, Class 6 Harvard University.
Leadership is the influencing process of leaders and followers to achieve organizational objectives through change. 1-3.
Studying Leadership. Trait Theory of Leadership ► Great Leaders are born, not made ► A Summary of the personality traits of leaders vs. non- leaders 
Introduction to Leadership Leading to Achieve Optimal Performance Instructor Name MIPH September – 17 October, 2008.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-18. Summary of Lecture-17.
Team Performance The MANAGEMENT Factor Scott T. Young, Ph.D. Department of Management.
MATTHEW GONIWE SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE Leadership Styles – Self Reflection Presentation at EMASA 2016 Conference by Dr. More Chakane CEO: MGSLG.
Chapter Five Contingency and Situational Leadership
CHAPTER 11 Leadership Andrew J. DuBrin
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
LEADERSHIP By Devpriya Dey.
KOMUNIKASI KEPIMPINAN
Defining Leadership.
GROUPS AND TEAMS.
What Makes a Group of Executives a Real Team?
Step up to Action.
Presentation transcript:

Effective Leadership at the Top IPAC - September 29th, 2005 Dr. François Ducharme

2 What Makes a Great Executive Leadership Team? Top Team A Skilled, Smart, Strategic Members Highly Analytical Thinkers Solid Leadership Capabilities Performance Results: Outstanding

3 What Makes a Great Executive Leadership Team? Top Team A Skilled, Smart, Strategic Members Highly Analytical Thinkers Solid Leadership Capabilities Performance Results: Outstanding Top Team B Skilled, Smart, Strategic Members Highly Analytical Thinkers Solid Leadership Capabilities Performance Results: Mediocre

4 The Research: A Hay / Harvard Study n Formed a partnership with Richard Hackman of Harvard University* n Gathered data on 60 plus executive teams in 1998 (now, close to 100 organizations) n Created cross-cultural sample of 48 teams * Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

5 The Research: A Hay / Harvard Study n Analyzed intact leadership teams (management and executive) Outstanding vs. typical vs. poor teams n Conducted independent assessment Product quality, organizational performance, team capability, individual capability  Created largest empirical database on Top Executive Teams in the world n Validated through climate survey in their organization

6 Organizational Climate Definitions Unnecessary procedures are minimized New ideas are accepted Authority is delegated People are held accountable Mediocrity is not tolerated Goals are challenging but attainable Flexibility Responsibility Standards Rewards Clarity Team Commitment Feedback reflects performance Rewards differentiate performance Direction, roles and accountabilities are clear People are proud to belong People cooperate and give discretionary effort

7 Climates Created in High Performing Teams Percentile Gap Flexibility Responsibility Standards Rewards Team Commitment ClarityTotal Outstanding

8 Climates Created in High Performing Teams Percentile Gap Flexibility Responsibility Standards Rewards Team Commitment ClarityTotal Typical Outstanding

9 Climates Created in High Performing Teams Percentile Gap Flexibility Responsibility Standards Rewards Team Commitment Clarity Total Poor Typical Outstanding

10 The Results: 5 Key Findings 1.Outstanding leadership teams are real teams 2. Leaders of outstanding teams are not the “superstar” organizational leaders we usually think of 3.Leaders of outstanding teams pull together and manage the conditions necessary for team success

11 The Results: 5 Key Findings 4.Leaders of outstanding teams have unique leadership styles and competencies 5.Members of outstanding leadership teams are not smarter, but they have more “emotional” intelligence

Top Leadership Teams Are Real Teams n Outstanding leadership teams: Have clear, stable boundaries n Complete interdependent tasks collectively: Set enduring mission with jointly accountable goals –Identifying 4 levels of accountability: Prime, Shared, Contributory, Remote Develop and monitor strategy together

13 2- Top Team Leaders Aren’t Necessarily the Superstar Organizational Leaders Leaders of outstanding teams: n Often take a less visible role n Rely less on their own talents, and more on those of others n Create a climate and conditions that foster team success

14 3- Leaders of outstanding teams pull together the conditions necessary for team success Development Direction Structure People Leadership Support Results Conditions Leaders of outstanding teams manage three main conditions for team success.

15 The Conditions for Team Success: Direction The purpose of the team must be n Clear Do we know where we are going? n Challenging Is the goal challenging, but not impossible? n Consequential Is the goal meaningful and engaging to us?

16 The Conditions for Team Success: Structure Well-designed team task n Do we have an interdependent goal? n Are we approaching it strategically? Optimal Composition n Are we the right size? n Do we have the right skill set? Norms n Do we adhere to effective norms of behaviour in conducting our business? n Focus on the goal rather than internal conflict

17 The Conditions for Team Success: People Outstanding Team define competencies required for new team members, such as: n Smart Analytical Thinking, Conceptual Thinking n Driven Achievement Orientation, Initiative, Strategic Orientation, Self-Confidence, Directiveness n Committed to the team Executive Maturity, Impact and Influence, Teamwork, Team Leadership

18 4- Leaders of outstanding teams have unique managerial styles and competencies Exhibit a broader set of managerial styles Rely more on managerial styles that encourage dialogue n Authoritative n Affiliative n Democratic n Coaching Avoid a coercive style that shuts down dialogue

19 The Outstanding Leader’s Managerial Styles 100% CoerciveAuthori- tative AffiliativeDemo- cratic Pace- setting Coaching Outstanding Typical Poor

20 The Outstanding Team Leader’s Competencies Holds people accountable for how they behave n Team Leadership n Integrity n Directiveness Links the team and its purpose to the broader organization n Organizational Commitment n Information Seeking Establishes and prioritizes the team’s actions n Achievement Orientation n Executive Maturity

21 Leaders of Outstanding Teams Hold People Accountable Outstanding Typical Levels of Competency Team Leadership IntegrityDirectiveness Competency

22 Leaders of Outstanding Teams Link to the Organization Levels of Competency Organizational Commitment* Information Seeking Competency Outstanding Typical

23 Leaders of Outstanding Teams Establish and Prioritize Actions Levels of Competency Achievement Orientation Executive Maturity Competency Outstanding Typical

24 5- Leaders of outstanding teams have higher levels of emotional intelligence n More in control of their emotions Better able to handle challenging situations Better able to calm others n More sensitive to others Better able to “read” others Better able to motivate others n More honest and genuine n More capable of developing and managing new relationships Emotional intelligence accounts for more than 85% of what separates outstanding from typical leaders They create emotionally intelligent organizations

25 How the Leader Affects People? There is a ripple effect... Leaders possessing emotional intelligence have high levels of leadership competencies. They also possess a broad repertoire of managerial styles to use. Broad managerial styles impacts directly the work climate of the team (r=0.72). Positive work climate explains 30% of the variance in organizational performance. Why? Positive work climate energizes the subordinate levels to invest their discretionary effort

26 Summary Outstanding executive teams need n The right leader Focuses on the conditions necessary for team success May not be a charismatic superstar n The right–not necessarily the smartest–people High emotional intelligence n To be a real team Definition of the group’s work as interdependent With clear boundaries

Effective Leadership at the Top IPAC - September 29th, 2005 Dr. François Ducharme