ICS – Software Engineering Group 1 Status of SNS Carl Lionberger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Costs are planned, measured, analyzed and controlled in terms of project activities.  Expenditure for any activity is incurred evenly over the duration.
Advertisements

System Testing 2  Effective March 3, 2014, new requirements for system testing were implemented  State Agencies are now required to provide to FNS:
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, US CMS Cost & Schedule Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer DOE/NSF Review 8 May 2001.
ESS Timing System Plans and Requirements Timo Korhonen Chief Engineer, Integrated Control System Division May 19, 2014.
LCLS Control System Overview Mike Zelazny SLAC ICD Software Department Accelerator Directorate.
Status of the European Spallation Source Timo Korhonen Chief Engineer, Integrated Control System Division October 21, 2014.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
1 Chapter 7 Project Scheduling and Tracking. 2 Write it Down! SoftwareProjectPlan Project Scope EstimatesRisksSchedule Control strategy.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
EPICS Meeting 2005ORNL Rdb systems at SNS Jeff Patton and cast April 27-29, 2005 EPICS Meeting 2005.
Geoff Pile FAC Review - Undulator 12 November 2008 LCLS Undulator System Overview and Fabrication Geoff Pile.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 16-17, 2007 Breakout Session: Controls Controls Commissioning Experience.
Chapter 10: Monitoring and Controlling Change
Overview of the Schedule and Budget for the ARCS Instrument Doug Abernathy ARCS Hardware Project Manager ARCS Construction Project Review DOE Germantown.
M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 8 June 2009
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Next Linear Collider Test Accelerator EPICS Support S. Allison, R. Chestnut, M. Clausen, K. Luchini.
OPMA 5364 Project Management Part 6 Project Control
Chapter 10 Project Monitoring and Control
CD FY08 Tactical Plan Status FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report for Network Infrastructure Upgrades Rick Finnegan April 22, 2008.
Cost Management Week 6-7 Learning Objectives
The ESS vacuum team has overall responsibility for all technical vacuum systems used on the: Accelerator, Target and Neutron Scattering Instruments and.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
SNS Integrated Control System EPICS Collaboration Meeting SNS Machine Protection System SNS Timing System Coles Sibley xxxx/vlb.
Control and Monitoring System / EPICS Pete Owens Daresbury Laboratory.
Experimental Facilities DivisionOak Ridge SNS INSTRUMENTS OVERVIEW R. K. Crawford Instrument Systems Senior Team Leader September 10, 2004 HYSPEC IDT Meeting.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Slow Controls Ken Livingston University of Glasgow.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Chapter 9 Project Development. What to manager Client experience  Clients are very important  Happy or not is largely dependent on their expectations.
Project Management Part 6 Project Control. Part 6 - Project Control2 Topic Outline: Project Control Project control steps Measuring and monitoring system.
Project Scheduling 1. Why Are Projects Late? An unrealistic deadline established by someone outside the software development group Changing customer requirements.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Earned Value Concepts Lecture # 19.
Project Overview How to get here…. Half Way to the Test Run October 18, 2012HPS Project Overview2 …starting from here? John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
-1- Project Name Project Name Weekly Project Report Project Manager : __________________ Date : ___________________.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
$70,142,119 Total Reductions  Reduced by $32.54 million ◦ 190 Unfilled district positions ◦ Contingency Fund eliminated ◦ Departmental.
CD FY08 Tactical Plan Status FY08 Tactical Plan Status Report for Network Infrastructure Upgrades Rick Finnegan April 22, 2008.
Project Cost Management
Operational SNS Karen S. White Controls Group Leader 10/11/10.
Construction of new Neutron Diffractometer and Neutron Optics Test Station at MIT for research in materials science and neutron optics and education of.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE The Making of the Spallation Neutron Source A 25-Year Journey Patricia Dehmer Deputy Director for Science Programs & Acting Director.
Page 1 May 10, 2011 IT for the 12 GeV Era 2011 Review Review Closing Summary.
The European Spallation Source Control System
Office of Science (SC) Overview John Yates Office of Operations Program Management, SC-33 Office of Science Briefing for DOE FIMS Training at ANL – May.
ICS – Software Engineering Group 1 IOC Operations at SNS Carl Lionberger.
National Archives and Records Administration Status of the ERA Project RACO Chicago Meg Phillips August 24, 2010.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Facility Managers Meeting DOE-OECM Certification of Earned Value Management Systems April 27-28,
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
Fundamentals of Workflow Analysis and Process Redesign Unit Process Change Implementation and Evaluation.
Neutron Chopper Technologies Work Package
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Project: Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
1 FVTX Monthly/Quarterly Report January 2009 Cost Summary Schedule Summary Current technical status of each WBS item.
Jefferson Lab Report Karen S. White 11/14/00. Overview  Status of Jefferson Lab Control System  Work In Progress  Transitioning to Operations.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office February 2014 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
U.S. ATLAS Facility Planning U.S. ATLAS Tier-2 & Tier-3 Meeting at SLAC 30 November 2007.
Earned Value Analysis Tracking Project Progress. Introduction | Components | Project Scenario | Values | Calculations | Forecasts | Summary l What Is.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness Update TPTF May 5, 2008.
TeraGrid Arch Meeting RP Update: ORNL/NSTG 1 ORNL_RP_Update_ TeraGrid Arch Meeting RP Update: ORNL/NSTG August 1, 2008 John W. Cobb.
Where Module 04 : Knowing Where the Project Is 1.
Development Project Management Jim Kowalkowski. Outline Planning and managing software development – Definitions – Organizing schedule and work (overall.
ESS Integrated Control System Software Core Components S.Gysin
Information Security Crisis Management Daryl Goodwin.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office December 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the.
Concepts of Engineering Module 2 Test Review. Review Questions Design problems are broken down into sub- problems because smaller problems must be solved.
SNS Status Report Karen S. White 10/15/08.
Finance Committee Report
ICS update 7th Experiment Control Workshop
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
Conventional Facilities
Presentation transcript:

ICS – Software Engineering Group 1 Status of SNS Carl Lionberger

ICS – Software Engineering Group 2 Spallation Neutron Source The SNS will begin operation in 2006 At 1.4 MW it will be ~8x ISIS, the world’s leading pulsed spallation source The peak neutron flux will be ~20-100x ILL SNS will be the world’s leading facility for neutron scattering.

ICS – Software Engineering Group 3 SNS Construction Progress

ICS – Software Engineering Group 4 Project Status The FY 2003 request was $225M, fully funded minus $3M due to rescission Impact being evaluated The FY 2004 request is $143M as expected Overall project design is 87% complete Overall the project is 58% complete (through January 2003) and within budget and schedule constraints $1.4B and June 2006 completion Contingency is adequate at 19% ES&H performance outstanding >1.9 million construction site work hours without lost workday injury ….. BCWS ___ BCWP ___ ACWP

ICS – Software Engineering Group 5 Multi-Lab project

ICS – Software Engineering Group 6 SNS Project Staffing FY 2003 Project Average Staffing Through Jan. 2003: 2 FTEs above the FY 2003 plan average FTEs, a decrease of 4 FTEs from December Staffing Actuals for Jan. 2003: 655 FTEs, a decrease of 38 FTEs from 693 FTEs in December

ICS – Software Engineering Group 7 Multiple Labs Advantages Many teams working concurrently Labs working on parts that are their specialties

ICS – Software Engineering Group 8 Multiple Labs Problems All using EPICS, but often differently –Naming conventions and other standardizations are more important than they seem Last minute integration (at least from ORNL point of view) Developers don’t come with the system

ICS – Software Engineering Group 9 How far along are controls? Much is still at other labs but ready for installation; task of local staff largely integration. CF, Front end and 2 DTLS as well as overall patterns of timing, MPS, PPS and vacuum controls done. 25 iocs out of 150 online Also 250 NADS

ICS – Software Engineering Group 10 EPICS components Operator screens –We have lots, often eng level Alarm Handler previously not used- next run will indicate current success. Archiver – archiving lots of channels, needs some refinement Lots of physics apps that use JCA are well along. Matlab also useable tool with MCA BURT not in use previously – we have developed jburt - again, next run will tell.

ICS – Software Engineering Group 11 EPICS components 2 Striptool heavily used in operations Bumpless reboot widely used Elog developed and used IOC logging using EPICS logserver

ICS – Software Engineering Group 12 Conclusions We couldn’t do things this way without EPICS –Need fewer people –Equipment shows up with a compatible control system Even with EPICS there are still ownership and local practices issues We have a lot of work left to do.