Module 3-2 0 Crash Data Collection and Uses Describe the process by which crash data are collected and used in road safety management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
George Yannis European Transport Safety Council, Learning from each other Road accident data in the enlarged European Union.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Meeting Objectives presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Dawn Sullivan, Oklahoma.
0 Data Through 2008 Report for Statewide Transportation Plan and Business Plan Performance Measures October 2009 Report to District Engineers Safety 2009.
GOAL: IMPROVE ILLINOIS TRAFFIC RECORDS Illinois Data Strategic Plan.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Highway Safety & Wildlife: A National Perspective October 24-25, 2005 Patrick Hasson National Technical Service Team Leader Safety and Design FHWA Tel:
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
State Crash Forms Catalogue 29 th Intl. Traffic Records Forum Session 36 July 16, 2003 Angie Schmit - TSASS.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
1 Meta-analysis issues Carolyn Mair and Martin Shepperd Brunel University, UK.
TRAFFIC RECORDS SYSTEM DMVUpdate August 19, 2008.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop TRB Keck Center March 27, 2006.
2 TRAFFIC RECORDS INFORMATION SYSTEMS Crashes Driver Records Vehicle Information Roadways Citation & Adjudication Injury Surveillance & EMS 9 Core Highway.
Origins, Characteristics, and Uses of Crash Data.
Developing Safety Plans Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration Tribal Transportation Program
Instructional System Design
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Iowa’s Impaired Driving Records Demonstration Project Traffic Records Forum July 16, 2003 Mary Jensen Iowa Department of Transportation Traffic Records.
Advancing Public Safety Through Technology Integration Advancing Public Safety Through Technology Integration National Model Scanning Tour May 7, 2003.
New England States Crash System Improvement Overview ME NH VT MA CTRI.
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
Prepared for Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Office of Grants and Research, Highway Safety Division Presented by Cindy Campbell,
10/16/ State Strategic Plan Review 10/16/063 Section 408 Program Matrix Systems: Crash Roadway Vehicle Driver Citation / Adjudication Injury Surveillance.
FMCSA Tools To Improve State Data Quality Presented By: Shaun Dagle.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Leanna Depue, Ph.D. On behalf of the Peer Exchange Planning Committee SHSP Survey Summary.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Model Impaired Driver Access System (MIDAS) David Brown, UA Mike Carroll, AOC Allen Parrish, UA Rhonda Stricklin, UA Presentation to Traffic Record Forum.
Model Impaired Driving Records Information System NHTSA DTNH22-98-D
Transportation Research Board Agency Update Barbara Hilger DeLucia August 6, 2002.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Results from 22 Traffic Records Assessments John Siegler National Driver Register and Traffic Records Division.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Types of Safety Data Crash Roadway Inventory Vehicle Registration Driver Licensing Citation/Adjudication Injury Surveillance/EMS Need to be linked …are.
Office of Research and Information Technology FMCSA Data Quality Program October 27, 2014 Traffic Records Forum.
Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) Everything you wanted to know about MMUCC.
Colorado’s Traffic Records Coordinating Committee Finding Common Ground.
FMCSA ANALYSIS DIVISIONData Quality Program August 2005 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration What Programs are Available to the States to Improve.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Recommended Tabulations and Dissemination Section B.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
Kentucky’s Open Portal Solution for Electronic Submissions Sgt. John R Carrico Kentucky State Police.
September 7, 2006 NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1 National Center for Health Statistics National Center for Health Statistics International.
Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Improving Accuracy.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Training and Technical Assistance Programs Sarah Weissman Pascual National Driver Register and Traffic Records.
Safety Starts with Crash Data Vision Zero Conference Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia December 3, 2015 Patricia Ott, P.E. MBO Engineering, LLC.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
SAFETEA-LU Funds administered by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.
Saving Lives Through Data Jeffrey W. Runge, MD Administrator, NHTSA 29 th International Traffic Records Forum Denver, Colorado.
NCHRP Synthesis 350 Crash Records Systems Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop March 27-28, 2006.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Washington Traffic Records Committee Creating & Coordinating a Shared Vision for Traffic Records 2006 Traffic Records Forum August 1, 2006.
March 2016 Advancing Drugged Driving Data at the State Level: Synthesis of Barriers and Expert Panel Recommendations.
Office of Research and Information Technology CVSA and FMCSA SSDQ Performance Measures: Crash Timeliness Inspection Timeliness April , 2013 CVSA.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Traffic Records Assessment Overview and Insights Luke Johnson | John Siegler Traffic Records Forum August 8, 2016.
Florida Citation Inventory System and Improvements to Citation / Adjudication Data 4/11/2016 4/11/2016.
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools
Effective Safety Data Governance (Illinois Experience)
TRCC Roundtable August 9, 2016.
Workshop for selected National CRVS Focal Points December 2017
NM Traffic Records Coordinating Committee
Data Integration Roundtable
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Presentation transcript:

Module Crash Data Collection and Uses Describe the process by which crash data are collected and used in road safety management.

Module Major Topics Importance of Accurate Data Data Collection Process Data Improvement Strategies Use of Safety Data in Road Safety Management

Module Crash Data Accuracy Case Study 60% of rural crashes coded to the zero milepost 81% of cross roads were missing 1/3 of all crashes missing location data Implications HSIP HSP CVSP SHSP

Module The “Torturous Path” of Crash Data Collection Crash Occurs Crash Report Completed Data Recorded in Database Crash Data Transferred to State Database Data Analyzed and Disseminated

Module Data Deficiencies Integration Accessibility Timeliness Accuracy Completeness Uniformity (or consistency)

Module Overcoming Data Deficiencies Training and Education Law enforcement officers Court officials and adjudicators Crash Report System Administrators Update or Review Crash Report Form

Module Overcoming Deficiencies (cont.) Technology (electronic collection, linkage, location identification, etc.) Policies and Procedures Collaboration (i.e., TRCC)

Module Electronic Reporting Systems Traffic and Criminal Software (TraCS) Crossroads Traffic Collision Database Mobile Capture and Reporting System (MCRS)

Module § 408 Grant Requirements First year grant TRCC Multi-year strategic plan Subsequent year grant Traffic records assessment TRCC Multi-year plan Grant funding specifications Measurable progress

Module NHTSA/State Partnership Traffic Records Program Needs Assessment Compare a state traffic safety program with current guidelines Report on the strengths and weaknesses of core systems Traffic Safety Information System Strategic Plan Strategic action plan to address system deficiencies – “living document” Encourage statewide integration of systems and resources

Module MMUCC Data Elements Crash Vehicle Collected - Collected at the scene and recorded onto crash report  Derived - Generated from computerized crash data  Linked – Linked to injury, driver history, vehicle registration, roadway inventory, or other data files. Person Roadway

Module Data Uses for Road Safety Management Use of Data Political Agendas Engineering Judgment Conventional Wisdom

Module The Benefits of Using Data Crash Trends High Crash Locations High Risk Groups Contributing Factors Program Evaluation Q: Is crashes per VMT a fair comparison among states? What does it imply that states can/should do to lower their rates?

Module High Crash Locations Number of Crashes Severity of Crashes Exposure, e.g., Volume of Traffic Contributing Factors Q: can you think of anything else? Hint: compare performance, cost?

Module High Risk Groups Comparing Crashes to National Averages Location Contributing Factors AgeAge Helmet useHelmet use Alcohol involvementAlcohol involvement SpeedingSpeeding UnendorsedUnendorsed

Module Evaluation BasicsPurpose To determine the benefits and costs of each strategy or actionTo determine the benefits and costs of each strategy or action To determine the effect of the overall programTo determine the effect of the overall program Types of Evaluation Formative - Assesses ongoing project activitiesFormative - Assesses ongoing project activities Summative - Collects information about outcomes and related processes, strategies, and activitiesSummative - Collects information about outcomes and related processes, strategies, and activities

Module Program Evaluation Crash Reports and Statistics Costs Program Management Policies and Procedures Public Knowledge and Attitude Surveys

Module Evaluation Measures Identify Problems Plan New Programs Improve Existing Programs Evaluate Resource Allocation/Utilization Assess Effectiveness of Operational Policies, Procedures, and Protocols

Module Review Importance of Accurate Data Data Collection Process Data Improvement Strategies Use of Safety Data in Road Safety Management