Professionalising knowledge and data products It works!! Data –> Information flow for MSFD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

1 MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY MSFD regional data work flow: schema and examples Document: DIKE TSG1 WP4 MSFD.
1 ‘Role of the Marine Conventions in Eurowaternet development’ European Environment Agency (EEA) Anita Künitzer.
Regional Sea Conventions indicators and data flows for eutrophication TG DATA workshop on Eutrophication (D5) and Hazardous substance (D8) indicators and.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
EEA-RSC meeting to discuss relationship between regional and European assessments.
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
(03 JUNE 2013) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
SEIS CV Norway November 2008 WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe with marine data (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web-site near you)
(18 JUNE 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
26 February 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP3: QA/QC Validation – MSFD Interactions current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner contribution: ISPRA.
Expert Workshop, June , Split, Croatia Output from TG Data for MSFD implementation EMODnet Chemistry Giordano Giorgi - ISPRA.
Lesley Rickards MEDIN Core Team European initiatives and how MEDIN and the data in the framework relates to them.
Marine assessment workshop th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA.
(21 JANUARY 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
Trine Christiansen European Environment Agency (EEA) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 Copenhagen, 28 April
Trine Christiansen(EEA) Neil Holdsworth (ICES and ETC/ICM) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8 WG-DIKE, 30 September
EMODNET Preparatory Actions Progress meeting for ur-EMODNET preparatory actions, 24 November 2009 Presentation of Progress Chemical Lot Alessandra Giorgetti.
Monitoring Fact Sheets DIKE TSG1 04. July 2013, Copenhagen Proposal for the use of web-based monitoring “fact sheets” for the purpose of MSFD reporting.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
Norwegian Marine Data Centre, Bergen Nov International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Neil Holdsworth, Head of Data Centre
Outcomes from EMODnet/MSFD coordination meetings A. Giorgetti, M. Lipizer, M. Vinci EMODnet Chemistry, 3 rd year meeting, June 8-9, 2016 Helsinki, Finland.
(21 October 2015) Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) EMODnet-MSFD Cooperation process.
(9 June 2016) Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
WP5 Uptake, Outreach and Interaction
Alignment and Integration to MSFD
EMODnet Chemistry MSFD Board of Experts
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Marine Expert Group meeting Brussels, 6 November 2015
Monitoring Fact Sheets
Access to data from MSFD reporting
Trine Christiansen March 19, 2013
Indicator structure and common elements for information flow
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
OUTREACH AND INTERACTION WITH BOARD OF MSFD EXPERTS
EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG DIKE , Brussels Deltares.
TG-DATA meeting. 7-8 June 2017, Copenhagen
Draft CIS work programme
Q1: How are the overlaps between MSFD and other EU and RSCs requirements going to be considered and coordinated? How far is the current effort contributing.
TGDATA 13/2, WGDIKE 14/2 Good afternoon everyone and thanks for the opportunity of presenting at this meeting the progress.
Progress in the implementation of D11
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
European Commission DG Environment
MSFD list of criteria elements
MSFD Marine Litter D10 – EMODNET Collaboration
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
MSFD list of criteria elements
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Strategy Framework Directive State of play and follow up
MSFD - Technical Group on Marine Litter Progress and future work
Interaction with TG DATA and INSPIRE use case
Michael Lutz, Paul Smits (JRC.B6/I.2), Lydia Martin-Roumegas (ENV.C.2)
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Joint meeting of WG’s DIKE, GES, POMESA 27 April 2017, Brussels
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Environment and Water Industry
- Plans on the revision of reporting schemas/guidance -
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
Presentation transcript:

Professionalising knowledge and data products It works!! Data –> Information flow for MSFD

Agreed under TGDATA and WGDIKE

Data –> Information flow for MSFD Additional Biodiversity ‘headache’ More ‘lines’ Not making the same thing

Data –> Information flow for MSFD EU Process governance EU Process governance Operators Methodology Operational basis Operational basis Data Collection Data Assembly Indicator provision Assessment

Data –> Information flow for MSFD STRUCTURAL PROCESS COMPONENT Data CollectionData Assembly Indicator (in reference to COM decision and on-going RSC indicator activities) Assessment EU process Governance MSFD CIS/WG-DIKE (ultimately MS Marine Directors) Data from Member state monitoring programme(s) (art 19.3 and art 11)that provide linkage and reference to MSFD monitoring provision MSFD CIS/WG-GES (ultimately MS Marine Directors) Common understanding approach MSFD indicators derived or adapted from Regional sea and Member state indicators that provide basis for common implementation MS art 8 assessments, Regional assessments, EEA MSFD baseline assessment Methodology Regional sea and member state monitoring guidelines manuals related to specific parameter(s) Specific guidelines/Manuals on indicator production methodology, including reference to MSFD marine unit and assembly method of data Assessment methodology as agreed in MSFD or regional context Operational basis Linked to monitoring guidelines and indicator methodology Member State data provision mechanism(s)  Availability  Access rights  Temporal coverage  Observation frequency  Usage rights  Update frequency  Format/Outputs  Metadata  Spatial unit(s) Specifications for assembled data (input and output)  Location/Availability  Operational portal/web service  Usage rights  Update frequency  Format/Outputs  Metadata  MSFD Spatial unit: INSPIRE area mapping  QC applied Mechanisms to publish indicators:  Location/Availability  New/Existing provision  Supporting metadata  Frequency of provision  Spatial unit (related to MSFD units)  Context of use (consistency with MSFD scope) Definition of assessment product :  Appropriateness for MSFD output  Adaptations needed  Assessment scale  Temporal scale Potential Operators MSMS, RSC, ICES, Emodnet, Copernicus, EEA, others MS, RSC, EEA, others

TG Data workshop(s) on D5 and D8 Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators MSFD art 8, 9, 10 reporting from Palialexis et al MSFD Dissolved oxygen, i.e. changes due to increased organic matter decomposition and size of the area concerned X denotes reporting % of CPs reporting100-81%80-61%60-41%40-21%20-1% no reporting

TG Data workshop(s) on D5 and D8 Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators

Data –> Information flow for MSFD (coordinated) Monitoring Data provision Ingestion Data assembly (products) Indicator provision Assessment product(s) datainformationknowledge

Data –> Information flow for MSFD (coordinated) Monitoring Data provision Ingestion Data assembly (products) Indicator provision Assessment product(s) datainformationknowledge

D3: fisheries population demographics IBTSWG/DCF National Fisheries Institutes DATRAS (trawl survey regional database) CPUE age/subarea Indicator provision Assessment product(s) datainformationknowledge

D8: Hazardous substances Data –> Information flow for MSFD examples D5: Eutrophication

Data –> Information flow for MSFD Regional cohesion Rationalisation of reporting across instruments Making best use of what is already in place Understanding what is not in place

Data –> Information flow for MSFD We have a lot of knowledge to gain

MS information Data flow information** MS Reporting EIONET # of parameters # of stations (BSC,UNEP/MAP) or # of measurements (HELCOM, OSPAR) Annual observation frequency Name of RSC reporting programme Reporting frequency Latest reporting year Starting year for data flow Who provides data (institution) Which national body reports to the RSC Where are data provided to? (Organisation) Regional Sea Convention info Name of RSC database Holder of database Access rights to database Responsible for Q/A Indicator(s) (reference)

Operational basis Linked to monitoring guidelines and indicator methodology Member State data provision mechanism(s)  Availability  Access rights  Temporal coverage  Observation frequency  Usage rights  Update frequency  Format/Outpu ts  Metadata  Spatial unit(s) Specifications for assembled data (input and output)  Location/Availa bility  Operational portal/web service  Usage rights  Update frequency  Format/Output s  Metadata  MSFD Spatial unit: INSPIRE area mapping  QC applied Mechanisms to publish indicators:  Location/Availa bility  New/Existing provision  Supporting metadata  Frequency of provision  Spatial unit (related to MSFD units)  Context of use (consistency with MSFD scope) Definition of assessment product :  Appropriaten ess for MSFD output  Adaptations needed  Assessment scale  Temporal scale