M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Advertisements

Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix Main Menu.
February Dakar, Senegal
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs MCH in Developing Countries January 25, 2011.
The Programming Principles and the UNDAF
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Gender Aware Monitoring and Evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Presentation overview This presentation is comprised of the following sections:
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Model mod·el noun \mä-d ə l\ 1:Structural design. 2:A usually miniature representation of something; a pattern of something to be made. 3:An example for.
Rethinking Homelessness Their Future Depends on it!
Developing Indicators
How to Use National Governance Data for UNDAF, CCA and other development frameworks Workshop on Measuring and Assessing Democratic Governance November,
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
Monitoring &Evaluation System in Health Program. Brief overview of NACP Reporting units and quality aspects Data sets Learning/ Analysis of the data sets.
October 20, 2015 UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV Programs for MSM Linking data to Program Planning, Implementation, and Advocacy UNAIDS/S.NOORANI.
28 February, 2011 University of Pretoria
Indicators for ACSM.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
Impact Evaluation in Education Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation Andrew Jenkins 23/03/14.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.
The Multi-Sectoral Provincial Strategic Plan for HIV & AIDS, STIs & TB of KwaZulu-Natal Presentation to PEPFAR all partners meeting Monday 28.
The P Process Strategic Design
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Session 13: Monitoring and Evaluation PubH325 Global Social Marketing Donna Sherard, MPH November 30, 2009.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
YONECO SRHR POLICY. SHAREFRAME CONFERENCE Salima - Malawi Mr. Samuel Bota Board Member.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Developing Program Indicators Measuring Results MEASURE Evaluation.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Strategic Information on ART Scale up Kevin O'Reilly Department of HIV/AIDS WHO.
Performance Indicators
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Short term Medium term Long term
SOCIAL SCIENCES &TECHNOLOGY
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Health System Research Workshop
Resources Activity Measures Outcomes
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
monitoring & evaluation THD Unit, Stop TB department WHO Geneva
Nancy Padian UC Berkeley
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009

Why Standardized M&E Terminology? UNCT 26 th February 2009 A common understanding of M&E terminology is critical for: –maintaining clear communication –taking a common approach

M&E Definitions: Why Standardized M&E Terminology? UNCT 26 th February 2009 Monitoring—routine tracking and reporting of priority information about a plan / program / project, its inputs and intended outputs, outcomes and impacts Measurement of progress toward achieving program/project objectives; most often involves counting what we are doing.

M&E Definitions: Why Standardized M&E Terminology? Evaluation—the rigorous, scientifically-based collection of information about plan / program / intervention activities, characteristics, and outcomes that determine the merit or worth of the program/intervention

Program Improvement Program Improvement Reporting/ Accountability Reporting/ Accountability Data Sharing with Partners Data Sharing with Partners The Purpose of M&E

M&E Definitions: Results – RBM approach UNDAF and agency programmes in terms of a hierarchy of SMART results which has five levels: –MDG related national priority/ goal (equated with impact) –UNDAF outcome, know in Moz also as pillars –Outcome of one or more agencies working together –Output usually of one agency, but possibly of more than one working together –Activity Result

SMART Results S pecific: Results must use change language – they must describe a specific future condition M easurable: Results, whether quantitative or qualitative, must have measurable indicators, making it possible to assess whether they were achieved or not A chievable: Results must be within the capacity of the UNCT and partners to achieve R elevant: Results must make a contribution to selected priorities of the national development framework T imebound: Results are never open-ended - there is an expected date of accomplishment M&E Definitions: Results – RBM approach

The chain of results: causal sequence for an intervention to achieve desired objective UNCT 26 th February Management. Training. Counseling. Logistic management. Operation research. BCC. Conference. Facilitation. etc.. Services - Access - Quality. Awareness. Knowledge. Attitude. Capacities. Competency. Opinion. Aspiration. Motivation. Behaviors. Practices. Decision. Utilization of services Quality of life Conditions:. Human. Economic. Civic. Environment MDGs:. Poverty. Morbidity. Mortality. HIV prevalence. Education. Employment. Gender equality INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES IMPACT. Infrastructure. Human. Finance. Equipment. Technology. Policy. Time. Volunteers. Partners Measure process Measure impact

PlanningImplementation Outcomes -Formative Evaluation (Planning and Assessment) -Input/Output Monitoring -Process Evaluation -Outcome Monitoring -Outcome Evaluation -Impact Monitoring -Impact Evaluation What & how well we are doing?

Baselines, targets and performance Current level of achievem ent Commitment Performance Baseline TargetAchievement

WFP Emergency Operation M&E Framework Program-based Data Population-based Survey X kg maize, X kg oil X Kg other Input (Resources) Distribution of Family ration to Women Activities ( Interventions, Services) # of family ration recipients disaggregated by gender Output Targeted women receiving full family ration % of target house Hold with adequate Food supply Outcomes Increased household food supply Average # of Meals per day by gender and age Impact Increased consumption especially W, Ch & V Ind. Measure processMeasure impact RESULTS

HIV/AIDS M&E Framework Program-based Data Population-based Biological, Behavioral & Social Data Staff Funds Materials Facilities Supplies Input (Resources) Trainings Services Education Treatments Interventions Activities ( Interventions, Services) # Staff Trained # Condoms Provided # Clients Served # Tests Conducted Output (Immediate Effects) Situation Analysis Response Analysis Stakeholder Needs Resource Analysis Collaboration plans Program Development Data Assessment & Planning Provider Behavior Risk Behavior Service Use Clinical Outcomes Quality of Life Outcomes (Intermediate Effects) Social Norms HIV prevalence STI Incidence AIDS Morbidity AIDS Mortality Economic Impact Impact (Long-term Effects) Measure processMeasure impact

M&E Definitions: Indicators An Indicator is…. a variable that measures one aspect of a program/project and useful to measure changes Indicators are measures used to monitor progress made towards the achievement of intended RESULTS, considering as the output, outcome or impact of a development intervention.

M&E Definitions: SMART Indicators Specific: indicators need to measure what they claim to measure Measurable: can be quantified and measured by some scale Achievable: can data on the indicator actually be colleted? Relevant: does it provide information that is relevant to the programme decision makers? Time-bound: when is change expected?

Strategic Planning for M&E: Setting Realistic Expectations Most Some Few* All Input/ Output Monitoring Process Evaluation Outcome Monitoring / Evaluation Levels of Monitoring & Evaluation Effort Number of Projects 15 Impact Monitoring / Evaluation

Key messages: 1.The main purpose of M&E is programme/project improvement. 2.M&E is not only about INDICATORS. 3.M&E is an essential management tool and it is present along programme/project implementation. 4.M&E starts with the planning process.

THANK YOU