Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Advertisements

The Power of Employee Engagement
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Biology Staff Survey Why we ran a staff survey  To see how things have changed since the last survey (2011)  To find out what’s working well and.
Updates from HR Learning & Org. Effectiveness Stanford Employee Survey Results from 2010 Staff Resource Fair in March 2011.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey U of M: Overall Results umanitoba.ca.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
Increased Diversity of Workforce Chapter 3 Daphne Harley, MPA Adjunct Faculty – PPA 530.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.
Yale University 2004 Yale Workplace Survey Pilot Finance and Administration Senior Leadership Meeting, February 2005.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report Introduction OIRA administered the Employee Satisfaction Survey (ESS) in November-December 2003 to all AUB employees,
Phase II: Survey Findings January 2015 APSAC and CSSAC Presentation Purdue Quality of Work Environment Initiative 1.
CAROL ELLIS | MISSOURI STATE BOOKSTORE NADINE JONES | TECHNOLOGY & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ABBY ISACKSON | PUBLICATIONS JOHN PETERSON | PRINTING SERVICES.
2013 Administration & Resource Management (AR) Division Climate Survey Results 21 January 2014.
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
Athena SWAN Gender Equality Quantitative Survey Results
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Centennial Elementary School Parent Opinion Inventory 1 Ocean City Public Schools Parent Opinion Inventory Summary Analysis November 2007 Prepared by the.
March Staff Survey Results. STATE OF THE STAFF (2010 Staff Survey Results)
A Tale of Two Surveys Metropolitan State College of Denver Faculty Senate Marilyn Cullen-Reavill, Diane Davis, Christopher Jennings & Aaron S. Richmond.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
“Employee Survey 2007” Analysis of results and comparison with 2005 survey results May 2007.
1 The Multicultural Climate at MSU- Mankato William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland
Campus Life Division Climate Survey Results and Plan of Action March 9, 2006.
Participation 92% Response Rate. Respondents to Questionnaire.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
College Student Survey (CSS) 2006 CSS INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE Margie Bennett, Director Institutional Research and Compliance March 2007.
ClimateQual Employee Climate Survey Measures staff perceptions Assess the health of a library Comparison to other like libraries Track changes over time.
2015 Survey Information Technology Services February 8, 2016 Climate and Diversity.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Personnel & Compensation. What is effective Human Resource Management ? The right people, doing the right work, fairly compensated and managed to meet.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
What Women have said helps them to succeed An evaluation of the women’s programs.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Items in red require your input
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2003
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Presentation transcript:

Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources

Purpose and Administration of Climate Survey Designed to evaluate how effective Emory has been at creating a diverse and ethically engaged work environment. Developed by Atlanta SurveyNET in close cooperation with PCORE. Thirty-two items were created to measure six key areas: Management Support Selection/Hiring Practices Work Group Practices Coworker Interactions Development Opportunities Value of Diversity

Purpose and Administration of Climate Survey cont’d Six items were added to measure organizational commitment. One item evaluated the university’s efforts to create an environment where individuals feel welcomed and valued. Survey was administered November 29 – December 17, 2004 and could be completed online or by hardcopy. All items were answered on a scale of 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).

Response Rate A total of 8,573 surveys were distributed to employees. A total of 3,239 employees responded (39%). Women2017 (62%)Men1170 (36%) White2129 (66%)Minority975 (30%) Faculty959 (30%)Staff2215 (68%)

Overall Results Category Percentage of respondents who answered favorably Overall mean/average (out of a possible 5) Emory Overall66%3.72 Value of Diversity85%4.27 Organization Commitment78%4.07 Co-worker Interaction68%3.73 Selection/Hiring Practice62%3.59 Management Support60%3.55 Development Opportunities59%3.51 Work Group Practices52%3.29 Reports show a mean average and percent positive for all categories.

Welcomed and Valued Employees feel welcomed and valued at Emory. Overall rating - 60% positive Males were more favorable (67%) than females (56%). Employees who responded favorable: less than two years experience (71%) employees under 25 years of age (76%) over 64 years of age (79%) Blacks responded less favorably (49%).

Value of Diversity Employees recognize the importance/value of diversity. 85% of employees recognized the importance of diversity in the workplace. Gays/lesbians responded the most positive (90% positive). Two groups responding the least positive were those identified as: Trades/Crafts jobs (67%) Service Maintenance jobs (72%)

Organizational Commitment 78% of employees indicated a strong commitment to the organization’s goals & objectives. Respondents showed a willingness to pursue a long-term career with Emory, and A willingness to go beyond what is expected to help the university be successful. Group ratings were consistently high on commitment.

Positive Findings Management Support Even if we hold differing viewpoints, my supervisor treats me with respect (79%). I can communicate with a my supervisor through give-and-take discussions (74%). Coworker Interaction I do not have to compromise my values and beliefs around my coworkers (74%). My coworkers acknowledge my job accomplishments (71%).

Positive Findings cont’d Development Opportunities I am given opportunities to participate in job- related training (69%). Work Group Practices Special work arrangements are provided for employees with disabilities (68%).

Negative Findings Management Support I get reliable information through Emory’s official lines of communications (24%). Work Group Practices Given my duties and responsibilities, the amount of pay I receive is fair (40%). There is more emphasis on teamwork than on the interests of any one group (43%). Rules are applied equally to everyone in my department (49%). Development Opportunities I am provided advise/support on how to enhance my career at Emory (43%).

Group Results by Category Overall, the following group differences were observed across category: Faculty (70%) were more positive than staff (65%). Executive/administrative managerial responded more favorably (70%) than service maintenance workers who responded least favorably (56%). Early career (less than 2 years exp) and late career employees (20 years exp) were most positive, while employee with 2-5 years exp were least positive. Part-time employee responded more positively than full- time employees.

Group Results by Category cont’d Males (69%) responded more favorably than females (65%) in all areas. Except for “Value of Diversity” where females (87%) responded more favorably. Whites (69%) and Hispanics (72%) responded the most positive, compared with Blacks (60%), Asians (67%), and American Indians (54%) who responded least positive. By age, employees less than 25 years of age and employees 51 years of age or more were most positive. The physically disabled responded least favorably (59%).

Employee Suggestions and Ideas A total of 3,079 comments were provided from 1,730 employees Most frequently areas cited were: Recruitment & Selection Compensation and Benefits Leadership Communication

Next Steps Develop a communication plan Distribute individual reports to Deans/VPs Resources will be available from Human Resources to assist departments in: Prioritizing issues Identifying Major Themes Reviewing comments themes or messages Developing an action plan