Annotated Bibliography. The Process 1. Find a topic 2. Compose a research question 3. Find sources 4. Create citations for those sources 5. Create annotations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSUASION.
Advertisements

Evaluating an Article: Using critical thinking and argument analysis From Little, Brown Handbook, Hubbuch, and the Toulmin Method Originally written by.
Suzanne Webb Lansing Community College WRIT122 January 21, 2010.
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
AP SMELL Analysis.
Understanding Argument
2.13 Justice and Culture Analyze and synthesize details from three texts about justice. Create an argument on an issue of justice using valid reasoning,
Standards  Writing  1.0 Writing Strategies: Students write coherent and focused texts that convey a well-defined perspective and tightly reasoned argument.
Weekly Objectives Weekly Objectives  Students will demonstrate mastery of argumentative techniques by writing a persuasive piece that expresses their.
Introduction to Argument
PROCESS How to Evaluate an Argument. Step #1 What is the subject?
Introduction to Rhetoric
+ Introduction to Argument From The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing and Norton Field Guide to Writing.
Journal Prompt  When considering rhetoric, it is easy to limit your thoughts to traditional text forms, like speech and writing.  What other kinds of.
Thomas Freeman WRIT 122.  There are three ways in which a person can argue their position. These ways consist of ethos, logos and pathos.  These different.
THE CORE OF AN ARGUMENT August 15, What does ethos mean to you?  Page 62 in WA  Ethos relates to the credibility of the writer.  Ethos is demonstrated.
Non Fiction Vocabulary MLA & Toulmin’s Argumentation February 2014.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part II: Types of Arguments.
Persuasive Writing Assignment The Hunger Games and Night.
Three Pillars of Persuasion Establishing Rhetorical Techniques.
The Formal Argument. Parts of a Formal Argument 1.Claim/Assertion 1.Qualifier 2.Reason 2.Evidence/Support 3.Counterclaims/Counterarguments 1.Concession.
Persuasion Getting people to agree with you Part I: Organizing your paper.
Parts of a Debate. Opening Statements Organization It must have an intro, body, and conclusion Try to think of a slogan to tie everything together Argument.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Recognizing Modes of Persuasion Objective: I will learn to recognize and apply rhetorical strategies.
Non-FictionNon-FictionNon-Fiction Lit. & Comp.- Introduction to Non-Fiction Non-Fiction.
CH 42 DEVELOPING A RESEARCH PLAN CH 43 FINDING SOURCES CH 44 EVALUATING SOURCES CH 45 SYNTHESIZING IDEAS Research!
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Argumentation The act or process of giving reasons for or against something. The act or process of making and presenting arguments.  MAKING A CLAIM 
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
Descriptions Concrete Ideas Examples Vivid details Energetic Language Strong Voice Strong Tone Direct Address to Audience Interesting Topic WHAT MAKES.
The Research Process and Information Literacy.  In our textbook, Writing Today, authors Richard Johnson-Sheehan and Charles Paine say“(r)esearch requires.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
IS IT A QUARREL? HOW WILL YOUR ABILITY TO ARGUE EFFECTIVELY HELP YOU SUCCEED BOTH IN CLASS AND ON THE JOB? What is an argument?
Nonfiction Terms. Types of Nonfiction ▪ Biography: An account of a person’s life as written by another person ▪ Autobiography: A writer’s account of his.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
 College requires critical reading and writing skills. This tutorial is designed to get you started by teaching you to attend to critical features of.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT Essay Writing Oakland Schools.
Informative Synthesis  Purpose: to convey information through summarizing in a clear, concise, organized manner (154)  Use source material to support.
What is rhetoric? What you need to know for AP Language.
RHETORICAL APPEALS Ethos, Pathos, Logos SWBAT explain and identify rhetorical appeals; identify appeals in argumentative essay.
The Three Ways We Persuade 1.Ethos (hand) 2.Logos (head) 3.Pathos (heart)
Chapter 4: Writing a Rhetorical Analysis ENG 113: Composition I.
A Change of Heart About Animals
Modes of Persuasion. The Appeals  ETHOS: Credibility/Ethical  PATHOS: Emotional  LOGOS: Logic/Reason.
Writing the Critical Analysis
Evidence & Argument: Multiple Ways of Experiencing a Text
Parts of an argument. . ..
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
What appeal are advertisers using to get you to buy their product?
Modes of Persuasion Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
What appeal are advertisers using to get you to buy their product?
Argumentation.
Persuasive Writing.
Rhetoric Rhetoric: Using language to persuade..
Annotated Bibliography
Macbeth.
Visual Argumentation.
Rhetoric.
John Tacapan Faculty Long Beach City College
6th grade Unit Three vocabulary
Annotated Bibliography
Methods of persuasion English Language Arts.
Keys to Convincing Others That You Are Right.
Writing Assignment Intro.
Methods of persuasion English Language Arts.
Writing an Argumentative Essay
13 September 2018 YOUR ARGUMENT'S BEST FRIEND
September 25, 2017 AP English 3 Mr. Bell
Presentation transcript:

Annotated Bibliography

The Process 1. Find a topic 2. Compose a research question 3. Find sources 4. Create citations for those sources 5. Create annotations for those sources 6. Submit a rough draft of your Annotated Bibliography 7. Turn in a final draft of your Annotated Bibliography

Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder (electronic or hard) labeled “ENC1101 Research” Keep a folder (electronic or hard) labeled “ENC1101 Research” Within that collect copies of all the articles and books, etc. that you think may be useful for your argumentative essay Within that collect copies of all the articles and books, etc. that you think may be useful for your argumentative essay You want to find sources that are biased as well as those that are objective You want to find sources that are biased as well as those that are objective You want sources that offer differing perspectives on your research question You want sources that offer differing perspectives on your research question You want to find popular and scholarly sources You want to find popular and scholarly sources You want to use at least one primary source You want to use at least one primary source (an interview, survey, or observation)

Keeping Your Research Organized As you read each source, take notes on the information you are looking to summarize in the annotation: As you read each source, take notes on the information you are looking to summarize in the annotation: –What kind of source it is (article from a journal, book, DVD, etc.) –What type of source it is (scholarly or popular) –The perspective(s) on your research question it discusses –The credibility of the author and the publication –The main idea or claim of the source (will depend on if source is biased or not)  The logic of the source: –support for the main idea, claim, or perspective(s) –Evidence used for the perspective(s) –Assumptions made about your issue –Words or phrases that indicate bias or objectivity or too much reliance on emotion –How useful this source might be for you in building an argument

Sources: Types of Publications * Remember you have to identify in your annotation what type of source it is: scholarly or popular Scholarly Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed The author’s tone is more objective The author’s tone is more objective More jargon/technical terms More jargon/technical terms Authors are experts in that field Authors are experts in that field More research is included More research is included Citations obvious Citations obvious Usually lots of text / not many pictures Usually lots of text / not many picturesPopular Editor publishes Editor publishes May be more subjective May be more subjective Laymen’s terms/everyday words used Laymen’s terms/everyday words used Authors are often reporters Authors are often reporters Often little research Often little research Citation method often unclear Citation method often unclear Often has pictures/graphs Often has pictures/graphs

The Credibility of the Source Credibility or ethos: The author and publication’s credibility Credibility or ethos: The author and publication’s credibility –How much do you trust the source? –What credentials or experience does the source have regarding this issue? –Is the figure well-known? –Is there any reason you shouldn’t trust the author or publication?

Emotional Appeal Does the author use emotional reasoning? Does the author use emotional reasoning? If so, what emotions does he/she rely on? If so, what emotions does he/she rely on? Does the author responsibly use emotional appeals or does the writer try to overly rely on them? Does the author responsibly use emotional appeals or does the writer try to overly rely on them?

Logos Part of evaluating logic involves analyzing the reasoning of an argument Part of evaluating logic involves analyzing the reasoning of an argument Logos provides an overall framework of which ethos and pathos are a part Logos provides an overall framework of which ethos and pathos are a part Although logos may not inspire people as much as ethos and pathos it often keeps people from acting rashly or foolishly Although logos may not inspire people as much as ethos and pathos it often keeps people from acting rashly or foolishly

Parts of an argument Claim: Central argument (p. 141) Claim: Central argument (p. 141) Grounds: Support for argument in the form of reasons Grounds: Support for argument in the form of reasons Evidence: examples, authorities’ statements, statistics, facts, theoretical examples Evidence: examples, authorities’ statements, statistics, facts, theoretical examples Assumptions: belief that connects the claim and grounds Assumptions: belief that connects the claim and grounds

Reasons Reasons are statements that can be factual or opinionated Reasons are statements that can be factual or opinionated –Claim: You should wear a heavy coat today –Reason: Because it is snowing. –Assumption: ?

Assumptions Claims Claims Reasons Reasons Assumptions Assumptions Arguments, even with clear claims and reasons, often don’t make much sense without assumptions Arguments, even with clear claims and reasons, often don’t make much sense without assumptions They are the glue that hold the reasons to the claim They are the glue that hold the reasons to the claim They are sometimes explicitly stated but more often implied They are sometimes explicitly stated but more often implied

Identifying Assumptions Claim: Bill Clinton was a good president. Reason: He was skilled at foreign policy. Assumption: Any president who is skilled at foreign policy is a good president.

Identifying Assumptions Claim: You should visit Paris. Claim: You should visit Paris. Reason: They have the world’s best art museums. Reason: They have the world’s best art museums. Assumption: You should visit a place that has the best art museums. Assumption: You should visit a place that has the best art museums.

Assumptions (a.k.a. “warrants”) refer to the values and beliefs people hold (a.k.a. “warrants”) refer to the values and beliefs people hold Are opinions, not facts Are opinions, not facts Are shaped by our family, culture, education, region, friends, ideas, etc. Are shaped by our family, culture, education, region, friends, ideas, etc.

Practice Practice identifying the claim, reason, and assumption(s) behind a source Practice identifying the claim, reason, and assumption(s) behind a source