Survey Data 2007-2008 Executive Summary Fall 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Advertisements

Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
 Photography Degree Requirements catalog College of Social and Behavioral Sciences Presented by The Photography Department and the Office of.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
The Catholic University of America School of Arts and Sciences Washington, D.C. The Department of Education
Internship Programs A University Perspective By Dr. Lisa Stephenson The George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
F l o r i d a I n t e r n a t i o n a l U n i v e r s i t y School of Nursing Assessment of Learning at FIU School of Nursing Divina Grossman, PhD, RN,
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Criterion 4 Subcommittee Report The Highfalutenist – Rootentootenist Criterion Group You Ever Saw!
Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
The Catholic University of America School of Arts and Sciences Washington, D.C. The Department of Education
Revised Requirement Course Proposal.  Change the Requirements for the Bachelor’s Degree from A to B. Successfully complete the General Education Requirements.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
Position Statements You are the liaison between the membership of your state/province association and the NAEA Board of Directors.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
The Design and Use of a Career Portfolio to Promote Student Career Development Jill Lumsden Katie Meyer Robert Reardon James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State.
Inspire a world of good TOUGH ENOUGH ARE YOU TO INSPIRE A WORLD OF GOOD?
Survey Data Summary Data Compiled Fall 2007.
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING AT RYERSON PREDICTORS OF STUDENT SATISFACTION CHRISTOPHER EVANS VICE PROVOST ACADEMIC.
Remarks to the Council on Undergraduate Research February 22, 2013 President Patricia McGuire Trinity Washington University Washington, D.C.
BUILDING THE VISION Gregory G. Dell’Omo FACULTY CONVOCATION August 26, 2005.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
First Tuesday Series February 2, SACS -- Quality Enhancement Plan SACS requires that universities develop a comprehensive plan to enhance student.
St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Tachelle Banks, PhD & Debbie Jackson, EdD Project C.R.E.A.T.E The Curriculum Redesign Effort Advancing Teacher Education.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology Bachelor of Science Technology CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ExCEL After School Programs Elementary Lead Teacher Orientation
11 Report on Professional Development for and Update Developed for the Providence School Board March 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade.
Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.
N O The Standard Course Level Approach to Assessment of General Education DCC General Education Characteristics Writing Skills Oral Communications Analytical.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Forensic Science Teacher Danielle Bosch. What we do  Teach knowledge of forensic science  Teach critical thinking  Teach ethical awareness  Give overview.
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Leadership Requirement for Agronomy Majors Sherry Pogranichniy and Lance Gibson Introduction The Agronomy Department at.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Stetson University Department of Teacher Education From Mission Statement to Goals: How to get there from here!
Adjunct Faculty (New/Returning) August 11, 2011 Yuba College Jan Ponticelli, Ph.D.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
1. Reframing our specializations and M’Ed’s:
The Department of Education
How to get into grad school
Characteristic of Teachers
Competency Assessment
How would you grade the University for its contribution to your personal growth and development in each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Fail.
Curriculum & Instruction
CURRICULUM REVIEW ROAD MAP (IN ECONOMICS).
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008

Graduating Seniors Survey & Graduating Graduate Student Survey Two components: Two components: Basic UCF survey Basic UCF survey Optional program specific addendum Optional program specific addendum Still needed for: Still needed for: Applied Learning & Instruction M.A. Applied Learning & Instruction M.A. Curriculum & Instruction M.A. Curriculum & Instruction M.A. Early Childhood Development & Education M.A. Early Childhood Development & Education M.A. Instructional Technology M.A. (all 3 tracks) Instructional Technology M.A. (all 3 tracks) Sport & Fitness M.A. Sport & Fitness M.A. Teacher Leadership M.Ed. Teacher Leadership M.Ed. All Ed.S., Ed.D., & Ph.D. programs All Ed.S., Ed.D., & Ph.D. programs Results compiled and posted on Web by UCF OEAS Results compiled and posted on Web by UCF OEAS

Graduating Seniors Survey Data UCF Items of Interest – Positive Survey Item84.6%UCF Overall undergraduate experience98.0%95.1% Academic experience98.1%96.1% Challenged to do your best90.2%74.1% Maintenance of computer labs98.0%92.4% Responsiveness to student academic problems92.1%84.6% Recommend UCF to a friend or relative93.1%88.4% In major, courses needed were available93.2%69.7% In major, classes were too large [INVERSE SCALE]10.8%18.1% Academic advising in major88.8%84.6% Academic advising – transfer89.5%82.9% Degree Audit100.0%92.8% UCF Website98.9%93.7%

Graduating Seniors Survey Data UCF Items of Interest – Positive (cont.) Survey Items on Personal GrowthCEDUCF Writing effectively95.1%91.3% Speaking effectively98.0%92.1% Listening more closely to others96.1%91.6% Organizing time effectively88.2%87.6% Ethical practices96.0%89.7% Professional practices96.0%92.4% Respecting different philosophies and cultures95.0%90.2% Preparation to pursue life-long learning94.9%90.5% Improving your computer skills93.1%87.0% Improving your math skills79.0%80.2% Thinking logically/resolving analytical problems91.2%94.1%

Graduating Seniors & Graduating Graduate Student Surveys, Program Specific Addenda Response Scale 5 = Strongly Agree 5 = Strongly Agree 4 = Agree 4 = Agree 3 = Neutral 3 = Neutral 2 = Disagree 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree 1 = Strongly Disagree Typical question asked for candidate’s agreement with adequacy of preparation regarding variable X. Positive response percentage = % combined “5” and “4”

Graduating Seniors Survey Data Program Specific Addenda Items of Interest Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=76 > 93) Assessment80.6%88.4% 2. Communication97.4%92.5% 3. Continuous Improvement80.6%90.8% 4. Critical Thinking83.9%92.4% 5. Diversity84.9%89.5% 6. Ethics82.8%90.7% 7. Human Development & Learning81.1%89.4% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter74.7%91.3% 9. Learning Environments96.1%90.9% 10. Planning94.8%90.1% 11. Role of the Teacher81.1%89.4% 12. Technology93.4%82.6%

Graduating Seniors & Graduating Graduate Student Surveys Data Program Specific Addenda Items of Interest Opportunities for Improvement GSS: Field experiences other than internships71.0%73.3% GSS: ESOL preparation77.3%75.3% GSS: Portfolio47.4%32.2%

Graduating Seniors Survey Data Qualitative Items of Interest In what way did the CED best meet your expectations (n=83)? In what way did the CED best meet your expectations (n=83)? Professional preparation (39.8%) Professional preparation (39.8%) Quality of faculty members (20.5%) Quality of faculty members (20.5%) Quality of internship experience (13.3%) Quality of internship experience (13.3%) What one change would you suggest to improve CED (n=77)? What one change would you suggest to improve CED (n=77)? Ensure faculty have recent P-12 classroom experience and know ESOL (18.2%) Ensure faculty have recent P-12 classroom experience and know ESOL (18.2%) Improve ESOL instruction (16.9%) Improve ESOL instruction (16.9%) Variety of curriculum recommendations (16.9%) Variety of curriculum recommendations (16.9%) Improve/eliminate LiveText (14.3%) Improve/eliminate LiveText (14.3%) How did your experiences in CED assist you in becoming a reflective educator (n=71)? How did your experiences in CED assist you in becoming a reflective educator (n=71)? Wide variety of positive responses (e.g., “Very well. This was the most fulfilling part of the learning experience.” Wide variety of positive responses (e.g., “Very well. This was the most fulfilling part of the learning experience.”

Alumni Survey Data-1 st Year Perceived Self-Efficacy on FEAPs & ESOL Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=42) (n=118) 1. Assessment90.5%90.7% 2. Communication95.2%93.2% 3. Continuous Improvement95.2%94.1% 4. Critical Thinking83.3%91.5% 5. Diversity97.6%99.2% 6. Ethics97.6%95.7% 7. Human Development & Learning92.9%95.7% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter95.2%89.7% 9. Learning Environments97.6%93.1% 10. Planning88.1%89.8% 11. Role of the Teacher95.2%91.5% 12. Technology92.9%87.3% ESOL Preparation81.0%87.3%

Alumni Survey Data-4 th Year Perceived Self-Efficacy on FEAPs & ESOL Positive Ratings for FEAPs1 st Year (n=118)4 th Year (n=94) 1. Assessment90.7%89.4% 2. Communication93.2%90.4% 3. Continuous Improvement94.1%93.6% 4. Critical Thinking91.5%92.6% 5. Diversity99.2%93.5% 6. Ethics95.7% 7. Human Development & Learning95.7%92.4% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter89.7%93.6% 9. Learning Environments93.1%95.7% 10. Planning89.8%79.8% 11. Role of the Teacher91.5%89.2% 12. Technology87.3%81.9% ESOL Preparation87.3%73.4%

Employer Survey Data % of Graduates Rated Above Average or Excellent Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=173) (n=123) 1. Assessment76.0%73.2% 2. Communication77.8%74.8% 3. Continuous Improvement80.8%78.0% 4. Critical Thinking73.8%73.2% 5. Diversity85.2%79.7% 6. Ethics87.7%86.2% 7. Human Development & Learning77.8%74.8% 8. Knowledge of Subject Matter79.5%79.7% 9. Learning Environments80.6%76.4% 10. Planning77.6%78.9% 11. Role of the Teacher84.2%81.3% 12. Technology78.0%74.0%

Employer Survey Data % of Graduates Rated Above Average or Excellent Positive Ratings for FEAPs (n=173) (n=123) 13. Written/spoken communication skills81.9%88.6% 14. Recognize & remediate reading/computational problems79.8%76.4% 15. Integrate technology into teaching76.0%74.8% 16. Knowledge of Sunshine State Standards81.3%75.6% 17. Maintain orderly, disciplined classroom79.3%75.6% 18. Overall performance rating78.9% 19. Preparedness compared to other new teachers90.6%95.9% 20. Willing to hire other UCF graduates99.4%98.4%