Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Planning for Our Future:
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,
Section 4.9 Review Work Group Update to Board of Directors March 11, 2015.
Campus Improvement Plans
School Community Council Overview & Orientation Hawaii Department of Education For Training Use Only Office of Curriculum Instruction and Student Support.
RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Puget Sound Monitoring Consortium March-April 2008 updates to interested parties.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Proposed Process for Chesapeake Bay Program Adaptive Management Using ChesapeakeStat… Enhanced Partnering, Leadership, and Management Goal Implementation.
Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Early Childhood Data Governance: Overview and Implementation
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board April 11, 2013.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Meeting May 12, 2009 Mount Vernon, Virginia Jeff Corbin, Virginia Assistant Secretary of Natural Resources.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
Paint Product Stewardship Initiative Chicago, IL September 20-21, 2004.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
DRRP’s Updated MOU: Implementing the Transition Plan for Monitoring and Maintenance Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/5/13 for MB Review 1.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
November 1, 2011 Regional Technical Forum. RTF CHARTER RTF BYLAWS -Establishes RTF as advisory committee to the Council -Details RTF’s purpose and scope.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.
Sauder Unlimited presents… Corporate Development 101 Corey Wong President of BizTech ( )
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
THREE-YEAR LOCAL STRATEGIC PLANNING
Program Manager, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
E.O Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Architecture
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership
Presentation transcript:

Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013

2 GIT6 - Establish GIT sub-group fully representative of all partners - Determine next step to finalize goals - Determine key governance issues - Look at issues and early decisions needed for agreement PSC - Adopt or recommend changes to goals - Provide input and guidance on key governance issues - Select style of agreement & provide guidance for EC directive GIT6 - Build out PSC selected options - Coordinate with other GITs to finalize goals - Develop EC directive --- including governance and alignment leading to new agreement Proposed Outline for Alignment Process PSC - Final adoption of goals - Approve final directive content for adoption at 2013 EC Meeting MB - Receive MB Input December - January January 10 th MB Meeting March PSC Meeting March - April GIT6 - Coordinate effort with GITs to finalize proposed new goals - Build out potential governance options - Build out options for potential new agreement April PSC Meeting January You Are Here MB Input MB Input MB Input

Options for Consideration Option 1 – Three-Part Agreement Option 2 – Comprehensive Agreement 2a – CBP version 2b – Chesapeake Bay Commission version Chesapeake Bay Agreement

■ The process we used was explicit, rational & fair ■ I was treated well, my input was heard ■ And I can live with the outcomes

Section 117, CWA Key Requirements Chesapeake Bay Agreement – (a)(2) “the formal, voluntary agreements executed to achieve the goal of restoring and protecting the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and the living resources of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and signed by the Chesapeake Executive Council. “ Members of the Chesapeake Executive Council – (a)(5) “the signatories to the Chesapeake Bay Agreement.”

Section 117, CWA Key Requirements Scope of the Chesapeake Bay Program – (b)(2)(B) “implementing and coordinating science, research, modeling, support services, monitoring, data collection, and other activities that support the Chesapeake Bay Program; “improve the water quality and living resources in the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem” “ developing and implementing specific action plans to carry out the responsibilities of the signatories”

Section 117, CWA Key Requirements Granting Funds – “If a signatory jurisdiction has approved and committed to implement all or substantially all aspects of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement… the Administrator— (A) shall make a grant to the jurisdiction for the purpose of implementing the management mechanisms established and conditions as the Administrator considers appropriate; and (B) may make a grant to a signatory jurisdiction for the purpose of monitoring the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.

Discussion Process 1.Listen to the Options 2.Discuss and Debate Options 3.Make a Final Decision

Overview of Options Option 1: Three-Part Agreement Three separate documents: Chesapeake Bay Agreement 2.CBP Outcomes 3.(CBP Governance )

Overview of Options Document 1: 2013 Chesapeake Bay Agreement Section 1: Preamble Section 2: Vision Section 3: Mission Section 4: Goals Section 5: Membership Section 6: Principles Section 7: Effective Date Section 8: Affirmation and Signatures Decision: Additional FLC representation? Decision – Alternatives to full membership?

Overview of Options Document 2: CBP Outcomes Decision: Should the Outcomes document be signed by the EC or PSC? Document 3: Governance

Overview of Options Option 2a: Comprehensive Agreement 2013 Chesapeake Bay Agreement Section 1: Preamble Section 2: Vision Section 3: Mission Section 4: Goals and Outcomes Section 5: Membership Section 6: Principals Section 7: Effective Date Section 8: Affirmation and Signatures Appendix: CBP Governance (or separate document) Decision: How frequently would this agreement type be updated so that goals, outcomes, indicators and measures remain current?”

Overview of Options Option 2b: Comprehensive Agreement Chesapeake Bay Commission Draft Section 1: Preamble – history, benefits and accomplishments Section 2: Clean Water – two goal statements Section 3: Restoring the Resources – several goal statements Section 4: The Partnership – recognition of Partnership’s importance; would include two goals Section 5: Signatures Appendix A: Role of Federal Partners Appendix B: Governance and Structure – by-laws of the Partnership, describing each level of the partnership, responsibilities, and the decision-making process.