Action Research Deployment Teams September, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Research Deployment Teams
Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Beginning Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Continuous Improvement Professional Learning Community Framework What does it look like? What does it look like? Module Two.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
Beginning Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools October, 2004 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
PDSA in the Classroom
P D S A REVIEW ACT PLAN STUDY DO Plan Continuous Improvement
Continuing and Expanding Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools October, 2004 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Continuous Improvement
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Action Research Deployment Teams November 29/30, 2006.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
PDSA Classroom.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Part II The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom
Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
Introductions & Welcome!
Continuous Improvement In the CRCSD Putting the Pieces Together.
Quality Liaisons November 6th, Responsibilities of the Quality Liaison: Main communication channel between the District and school/department Serve.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Please sit by SIP goal area 1.) Find the SIP goal area that matches the Action Research area you work on.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Day
Please sit by level. Welcome! Quality Liaisons Leaders of Continuous Improvement.
Digging Deeper Into Quality Tools Process and Tools Training Toolbook -PQ Systems - -Information in this presentation is derived.
Digging Deeper Into Quality Tools Process and Tools Training Toolbook -PQ Systems - -Information in this presentation is derived.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
The Continuous Improvement Classroom PDSA. Ground rules created by students Classroom mission statements Classroom and student measurable goals Quality.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom PDSA. Ground rules created by students Classroom mission statements Classroom and student measurable goals Quality.
Digging Deeper Into Quality Tools Process and Tools Training Toolbook -PQ Systems - -Information in this presentation is derived.
Getting Focused on Continuous Improvement
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Level II
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Instructional Decision Making
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Welcome! Quality Liaisons Leaders of Continuous Improvement.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Building Leadership Teams
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Action Research Deployment Teams March, Agenda  Team reflection  Completing the PDSA cycle  Team planning for continuous improvement.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement Facilitator Paul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator 17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
تحقیقات عملیاتی دکتر نگین مسعودی علوی
Quality Liaisons Leaders of Continuous Improvement
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

Action Research Deployment Teams September, 2006

Welcome! Housekeeping Items Housekeeping Items Workshop Materials/Binder Workshop Materials/Binder Meeting Dates Meeting Dates How are things different at your school this year compared to last year (in the context of continuous improvement?) How are things different at your school this year compared to last year (in the context of continuous improvement?) What kinds of things did you think about/plan for? What kinds of things did you think about/plan for?

Last Years Focus… Setting and Communicating Direction Setting and Communicating Direction District Strategic Plan (on a page) District Strategic Plan (on a page) A focus on the School Improvement Plan (SIP) A focus on the School Improvement Plan (SIP) 4 Quality Levels 4 Quality Levels Establishing structure/common language Establishing structure/common language Building Leadership Teams (BLTs) Building Leadership Teams (BLTs) Action Research Deployment Teams Action Research Deployment Teams Quality Liaisons Quality Liaisons

This Years Focus… This Years Focus… Utilize the School Improvement Plan (SIP) to align efforts Utilize the School Improvement Plan (SIP) to align efforts Deeper understanding of PDSA Deeper understanding of PDSA Practice each step of PDSA Practice each step of PDSA Learn the tools used Learn the tools used Connect all employees to School Improvement Plans and the District strategic plan Connect all employees to School Improvement Plans and the District strategic plan

Action Research Is… Professional Learning Communities working together to solve problems Professional Learning Communities working together to solve problems Utilization of the 7 step, data-driven process of Plan-Do-Study-Act Utilization of the 7 step, data-driven process of Plan-Do-Study-Act Implementation of research-based best practices/improvement theory based root causes Implementation of research-based best practices/improvement theory based root causes A focus on continuous improvement by practitioners closest to the problem A focus on continuous improvement by practitioners closest to the problem

What do we really mean… Professional Learning Communities (PLC) In a professional learning community, there are deep collaborative discussions about current practices that might be hindering student academic success. - DuFour and Eaker

Action Research; The Vehicle Professional Learning Communities Use To Implement Change

ITBS Language Total Scores This data shows the big picture of language proficiency …

This data digs deeper through sub test areas of language skills…

This data digs deeper through disaggregation of student subgroups & non-proficient groups… Vocabulary

Non-Proficient Subgroups: African American American Indian IEP Low Income Data Review- A Laser Like Focus!

Next Steps… The Building Leadership Team writes a SMART Goal that is included in the School Improvement Plan (SIP) The Building Leadership Team writes a SMART Goal that is included in the School Improvement Plan (SIP) Then, the Action Research Team utilizes the PDSA process to work on the goal Then, the Action Research Team utilizes the PDSA process to work on the goal

So.. After reviewing vocabulary assessment data, teachers discuss options at a team meeting and use the PDSA process They define how they are currently teaching vocabulary (flowcharts) The team determines what other in-process measures they could use to see how students are doing in vocabulary and they collect data (run charts & pareto diagrams) to get baseline The team reviews the baseline data they collected and discuss root causes for the results they see (cause & effect diagrams & relations diagrams) Once root causes are identified, each member researches articles and best practices related to vocabulary instruction and submits the best to the group (improvement theory)

The team writes an action plan to carry out the improvement theory in their classrooms. Members practice newly-learned strategies (improvement theory), and measure the effectiveness of the strategies Members coach each other & may go into each others classroom to observe and provide feedback Members monitor student data to determine effectiveness of strategies (compare to baseline) Members reflect, observe, practice, receive feedback, gain expertise and standardize the new vocabulary instruction practice (new flowchart) Teams continue to use the PDSA cycle to make improvements in the realm of their professional learning community

Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Whys, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research- based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities

Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Whys, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research- based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities

Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Whys, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research- based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities

Plan- Define The System What is the current way that the process is done or handled? What is the current way that the process is done or handled? Tool: Flow Chart Tool: Flow Chart

Flow Chart What is it? - A picture of any process - Drawn with standard symbols representing different types of activities - Different styles available: - Deployment - Process

Flow Chart Purpose - Defines the system being studied - Gets agreement - Identifies value added activities - Identifies dead wood activities - Documents changes to the process

Deployment Flow Chart How is it made? 1. Define the process boundaries (starting point / stopping point). 2. Describe the process in operation. 3. Draw the People Coordinate. 4. List major steps in the process. 5. Draw the flow chart, using symbols 6. Study the flow chart.

Start Task Make a Decision YesNo Conduct a Meeting Report Out End of Process

Flow Chart Example

KidsParents Bed Time Initiate Bed Time Procedures Are Kids Ready For Bed? Begin Bed Time Routine Brush TeethGo Potty Put On P.J.s YES NO Meet Need So Kids Are Ready For Bed Read Story Say Prayers Tuck In Kids Gets Into Bed

Flow Chart Lets practice the Flow Chart tool At your table, create a flow chart for the teachers lunch break routine –Describe the process and key steps involved

Team Time! 1. Define the process boundaries (starting point / stopping point). 2. Describe the process in operation. 3. Draw the People Coordinate. 4. List major steps in the process. 5. Draw the flow chart, using symbols 6. Study the flow chart.

Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Whys, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research- based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities

In Process Measures Data that can be collected frequently How much data is needed? How many data points? Measurement instrument may need to be created if one is not readily available Need an apples to apples comparison to determine if improvement theory worked At your table… Brainstorm possible measures for each SIP goal

In-Process Measure Example

Assess The Situation Once in-process measures have been identified and data collected… What does the baseline data look like? –This shows the current state of the area being studied Tools: Run Chart & Pareto Diagram

Run Chart What is it? A line graph (data plotted over time) Looks at the systems behavior over time Used by teams when gathering baseline data at the beginning of a PDSA project and again after the improvement theory has been tried

Estimation Check Sheet Weekly Class Errors Hour 1 - Mr. Albert Strategy Total 1-6 Week12-Sep19-Sep29-Sep3-Oct10-Oct17-Oct Addition Subtraction Multiplication Division Application students Total Errors Number of Students 28

Next… Pareto Diagram Paretos Law 80/20 Run chart = data over time Pareto Diagram = discrepancy data

Pareto Diagram What is it? - A bar chart which ranks related measures in decreasing order of occurrence - A tool to separate the significant aspects from the trivial ones

Pareto Diagram How is it made? 1. Collect the data. 2. Construct a frequency table. 3. Draw and scale the horizontal and vertical axes. 4. Draw and label the bars for each category 5. Draw the cumulative percentage line. 6. Review the results of the Pareto.

Pareto Diagram Sample Collect The Data CategoryTotal Unexcused Absences35 Drug & Alcohol Abuse7 Tardiness47 Illegal Parking2 Dress Code Violation1 Vandalism2 Class Disruption19 Fighting & Assault10 Total123 Raw Data

Construct Frequency Table CategoryFrequency Cumulative Frequency 1.Tardiness47 2. Unexcused Absences Class Disruption Fighting & Assault Drug & Alcohol Abuse Illegal Parking Vandalism Dress Code Violation 1123 Total 123 Data In Order

Draw & Scale Horizontal & Vertical Axes % 75% 50% 25% 0

Draw & Label The Bars Draw Cumulative % Line

PDSA Tidbits! Time to implement/deploy varies by team and content area Doesnt happen necessarily in a school year The entire school doesnt have to implement all improvement theories at once Multiple grades/departments could be working on individual aspects of the issue Is a PROCESS and a work in progress!

In Closing… Workshop Evaluation Next steps… Focus each PDSA team on the SMART goal of the SIP Consult the PDSA guides for help Work on Define the System ( Flow Chart) Work on Assess the Situation (In-Process Measures, Run Chart, Pareto Diagram) Set and communicate direction!

Action Research Deployment Teams September, 2006