July 2011 Improving the image of construction
July 2011 PROJECT MATRIX July 2011 Update
July 2011 Project Matrix Objectives To review the Code of Considerate Practice To review all related documents To review the method of site visits To review scoring To implement by 1 st January 2013
July 2011 Project Matrix Measures of Success Enhanced focus on ‘Improving the Image’ Code aligns with industry core values There’s a greater clarity, awareness and understanding of the Code by all It’s more challenging
July 2011 Project Matrix Measures of Success It’s more supportive of constructors There’s a broader range of scoring There’s more consistency in scoring SMEs can win awards
July 2011 Project Matrix Consultation The Scheme Board Monitors Associates
July 2011 Project Matrix Deliverables for 2011 New Code of Considerate Practice New Monitor Checklist A start on Examples of Good Practice Piloting/testing with Monitors and Associates Plans for: Communication Training Transition
July 2011 Project Matrix The Code 5 part Code supported by The Board Majority of Monitors Associates Code compliance is a core expectation
July 2011 Project Matrix The Code 5 part Code 4 key issues within each part A ‘strap-line’ which conveys the essence of each part An aspirational statement A focus on what concerns the public
July 2011 Improving the image of construction APPEARANCE COMMUNITY SAFETY ENVIRONMENT WORKFORCE
July 2011 Improving the image of construction Enhancing our APPEARANCE Respecting the COMMUNITY Securing Everyone’s SAFETY Protecting the ENVIRONMENT Caring for the WORKFORCE
July 2011 In everything that we do
July 2011 Enhancing Our APPEARANCE Worksites should appear professional and well managed. Ensuring that the appearance of worksites enhances the image of the industry and corporate identities. Being organised, clean and tidy on worksites and in the immediate surroundings. Enhancing and maintaining the appearance of site boundaries, site facilities, stored materials, vehicles and plant. Enhancing the image of site workers through what they wear.
July 2011 Respecting the COMMUNITY Constructors should give paramount consideration to the impact on neighbours and the public. Showing courtesy and respect to the public and others affected by the work, including keeping them informed. Minimising the impact of deliveries, parking and work on public highway. Contributing to and supporting the local community and economy. Working to create a positive and lasting impression and promoting the Code.
July 2011 Securing everyone’s SAFETY There should be a zero tolerance of poor safety performance. Having systems for ensuring work is carried out with care and consideration for the safety of the public, visitors and workers. Embedding attitudes and behaviours that enhance safety performance. Including initiatives for continuous safety improvement. Minimising security risks to neighbours.
July 2011 Protecting the ENVIRONMENT The environment should be enhanced by all that is done. Having systems for addressing waste, the carbon footprint, pollution, use of resources and sustainability. Minimising the impact of noise, vibration and light pollution. Protecting the ecology, the landscape, wildlife, vegetation and water courses. Making a positive contribution to the local environment.
July 2011 Caring for the WORKFORCE The industry should be an exemplar in the way that it cares for its workers. Providing a working environment in which everyone is respected, treated fairly, encouraged and supported. Securing acceptable standards of behaviour. Identifying personal development needs and providing training. Caring for the health and wellbeing of the workforce including maintaining high standards of welfare provision.
July 2011 Project Matrix Considerations: Monitoring and Checklists Code compliance is a core expectation Around 50 to 60 questions Remove ‘legal’ questions? Closed compliance questions? Other questions open and subjective? Scoring only starts when compliance achieved? A ‘star’ rating system for display on sites?
July 2011 Project Matrix Considerations: Monitoring Checklists Model A ‘Must do’ closed compliance questions No score if fail a compliance question Other ‘non-bold’ questions A bit like now Model B All open questions All directly related to the Code bullets
July 2011 Project Matrix Considerations: Monitoring Checklists Reports Take no longer to write than now Text by 5 part Code or by the 20 bullets Executive Summary Scoring Emphasis on the positive A 5 star scoring band that can be displayed on projects
July 2011 Project Matrix Associates Meeting Code and question set Liked a simplified ‘bullet’ text in ‘Plain English’ Like a strong link between Code and questions Strong preference for open questions and closed questions not liked ‘Unique’ should go
July 2011 Project Matrix Associates Meeting Reports and Scoring Reports need to be in the ‘positive’ Executive summary liked Scoring out of 100 or 50 allow a percentage score to be awarded A star system liked by some while some might be confused
July 2011 Project Matrix Deliverables for 2011 New Code of Considerate Practice New Monitor Checklist A start on Examples of Good Practice Piloting/testing with Monitors and Associates Plans for: Communication Training Transition
July 2011 Your questions?