Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving transportation into the future Strategic Highway Research Program.
Advertisements

Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
First Annual Virginia Distracted Driving Summit David S. Zuby Chief Research Officer September 19, 2013 Richmond, Virginia.
Age Groups Rank
Tools for the Road Ahead Overview Presentation. What is SHRP2? (Second Strategic Highway Research Program) Save lives. Save money. Save time. Products.
DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS A Collision Countermeasures Presentation.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Office of Safety Research and Development Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PRIORITIES GOVERNMENT.
Safety Implementation Update AASHTO RAC Meeting, July 22, 2014 Ann Brach, TRB, Director, SHRP 2 Debra Elston, Director of Corporate R&T, FHWA.
Weather and Winter Mobility Program Overview U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Paul Pisano Weather & Winter Mobility Coordinator.
Module 1-1 Road Safety 101. Module Tracking Your Progress Through Highway Safety Core Competencies Core Competency 1: Core Competency 2: Core Competency.
SHRP2 Implementation Update to the Standing Committee on Highways Pam Hutton, AASHTO May 29,
Safe Driving Jiahui Lu. Statistics for Young Drivers Traffic crashes are the number one cause of death among children and young adults 16-year-olds are.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
Rural ITS Safety Solutions (RITSS) 2010 ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, 2010 Marthand.
The Driver and Pedestrian Distraction Challenge Diane Wigle Safety Countermeasures Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April.
ITS America – April 2004 The Naturalistic Driving Study: Why are Crashes Occurring? Suzie Lee Research Scientist, Center for Crash Causation and Human.
Analysis of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data [S08(B)] Evaluation of Offset Left-Turn Lanes Jessica M. Hutton Presentation to MCTRS August 15,
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
1 Paul Pisano FHWA, Team Leader Road Weather & Work Zone Management Weather and the Connected Vehicle Presentation at the Connected Vehicle Program Public.
People Saving People Dec. 4, 2000 Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment Louis V. Lombardo Office of Human-Centered Research.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Meg Moore Traffic Engineering Section Director Traffic Operations Division Texas Department of Transportation.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
AASHTO Research Advisory Committee July 24, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Innovation in Lean Times.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
Teens and Trucks and Defeating Distracted Driving July 2011.
1 25 th International Conference on IIPS, AMS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ An Update on FHWA Road Weather Management Initiatives Paul Pisano Federal Highway.
® © 2011 National Safety Council Highway Venue. © 2011 National Safety Council 2 Highway Venue 212 million drivers (+1%) 255 million vehicles (+
National Road Safety Committee Cambodia’s response to the Decade of Action Mr. CHAN Dara Deputy Director General of Transport, Deputy General.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Weather and Surface Transportation A New Collaboration Presented By Arthur L. Handman Greater Hartford Transit District.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
IVBSS Program Overview and Accomplishments Presented by: Jim Sayer UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Briefing to OFCM CEISC James Pol USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office May 17, 2005.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Total Fatalities in Drunk Driving Crashes Vehicle Miles Traveled Total Drunk-Driving Fatalities Down 39% Despite an 86% Increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled.
Weather-Responsive Transportation Management Weather-Responsive Transportation Management ROEMER ALFELOR Federal Highway Administration NTOC Webcast March.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
June 23, 2006 Asset Management A Tool to Save Lives, Time, and $$$
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Safe Driving Presented by La’Tara Smith. Statistics for Young Drivers 16 year-olds have higher crash rates than drivers of any other age. 16-year-olds.
Safety Data and Analysis Center (STAC) Traffic Records Forum 10/27/2015 Carol H. Tan, PhD Team Leader, Safety Data & Analysis Office of Safety Research.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Using NHTS Data as a Measure of Exposure Data Meg Sweeney* Lee Giesbrecht Jonaki Bose Bureau of Transportation Statistics This work was completed while.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
Pedestrian Crash Briefing Aug 2008 NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1 Author: Dow Chang NHTSA Technical.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
Developing Highway Safety Performance Metrics in an Advanced Connected Vehicle Environment Utilizing Near-Crash Events from the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 – Safety Component (SHRP2 Safety) 2012 Update Forrest Council.
Greta Smith, P.E. Associate Program Director, Project Delivery AASHTO Subcommittee on Design June 5, 2013.
Saving Lives Through Data Jeffrey W. Runge, MD Administrator, NHTSA 29 th International Traffic Records Forum Denver, Colorado.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
The US Vehicle Safety Regulatory Process Martin Koubek Office of International Policy and Harmonization National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Overview of SHRP2 Safety Program Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety (SCOHTS) Rudy Malfabon, Nevada Department of Transportation April 28, 2016.
Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment
Shrp2 and safety training and analysis center (stac)
Missouri’s 2016 – Traffic Safety and Blueprint Conference
SHRP2 Archive System January 2016.
Moving transportation into the future
Tom Cole Chief Engineer, Idaho Transportation Department
Safety Research within Strategic Highway Research Program 2:
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Presentation transcript:

Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015

How Safety Can Improve Your Bottom Line In 2013, some 32,719 fatalities and 2.3 million injuries in the United States occurred as a result of traffic accidents. Crashes are the leading cause of death for children age 4 and for every age from 11 through 27. Economic cost of accidents was $277 billion in Total societal cost estimated at $870 billion. Every 1 percent reduction in traffic-related injuries and fatalities saves an estimated $2.3 billion annually. Sources: NHTSA, FHWA, Economic Cost of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes 2010 (DOT HS ) 2

A Wealth of New Data New SHRP2 data provide new set of tools for reducing crashes and improving highway safety: Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) database - what preceded crash and near-crash events, what drivers actually are doing during real-world driving conditions Roadway Information Database (RID) - a geo- database that contains detailed information about the roadway characteristics in and around the NDS study cities

SHRP2 Safety: Strategic Rationale Driver behavior is key: Primary factor in two-thirds of crashes Contributing factor in more than 90% of crashes Hardest to study; the thing we know the least about Opportunity - Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS): Miniaturized sensor technologies and increased computing capacity: can observe real-world driving Crash, pre-crash, near-crash, and “normal” driving data SHRP2’s NDS effort: 3,500+ drivers; 6 sites; all ages Data to be available for other researchers for decades 4

Safety - Implementation Assistance Program (IAP) Main Objectives Support demonstration projects on the use of the SHRP2 Safety Data Increase states’ understanding of the potential uses of the data Identify safety countermeasures based on research projects Reduce crashes and save lives ! 5

Safety IAP Process Phase 1 - Proof of Concept with a sample reduced data set Phase 2 full data set and in-depth research and analysis with countermeasure identification Phase 3 – Deployment, to adopt, champion or implement countermeasure nationally Decision 6

SHRP2 Ongoing Safety Projects PedestrianFlorida DOT Nevada DOT New York State DOT PedestrianFlorida DOT Nevada DOT New York State DOT Roadway DepartureIowa DOT SpeedingMichigan DOT Washington DOT SpeedingMichigan DOT Washington DOT Work ZonesMinnesota DOT Horizontal & Vertical CurvesNorth Carolina DOT Interchange RampsUtah DOT Adverse ConditionsWyoming DOT Roadway LightingWashington DOT

Wyoming’s Current Safety Issues 37.5% of crashes in Wyoming occur in inclement weather. Crashes are a leading cause of Interstate closures. ITS solutions (variable speed limits, digital messages, 511, phone apps) are increasing, but message effectiveness are “best practice.” 8

Phase 1: Can inclement weather trips and driver behavior be identified effectively using NDS data? How Drivers Respond to Adverse Weather Conditions State of Wyoming Department of Transportation

Drivers response to adverse weather Speed adaption Lane maintenance Car following Main Goal Project Main Goal Utilizing NDS & RID data to better understand driver behavior and performance during adverse weather conditions

Main Research Questions Overall, we want to identify and document the following information from the NDS and RID. 1.Crashes related to inclement weather trips 2.Driver responses (i.e., speed and headway adaptation, and lane wandering) during inclement weather 3.The best surrogate measures for weather-related crashes 4.Types of analysis and conclusions from the resulting dataset?

NDS Trips in Rain > 10 minutes FloridaWashingtonTotal Trips Participants Vehicles Events Data queried from NDS InSight website March 2015

Next Steps Extracted and analyzed related data using RID Requesting sample NDS data and identify the limitations The research team received 5 sample NDS data sets (Time series data, video views provided with DAS) Discussions ongoing about limitations 13

Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer, Pam Hutton, AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager, Aladdin Barkawi, FHWA Safety Lead, Questions