Current Mode Electronics for the Qweak Experiment Des Ramsay University of Manitoba/TRIUMF Qweak Collaboration Meeting TRIUMF, Vancouver October 14-15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Sensors Interfacing.
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
The MAD chip: 4 channel preamplifier + discriminator.
1 The Q p weak Experiment: A Search for Physics beyond the Standard Model via parity-violating e-p scattering at low Q 2 S. Page, PAVIO6, Milos, Greece.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Ultrafast 16-channel ADC for NICA-MPD Forward Detectors A.V. Shchipunov Join Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Development of novel R/O electronics for LAr detectors Max Hess Controller ADC Data Reduction Ethernet 10/100Mbit Host Detector typical block.
© 2012 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All rights reserved. Electronic Devices, 9th edition Thomas L. Floyd Electronic Devices Ninth.
Introduction to Op Amps
Ph. Farthouat CERN ELEC 2002 ADC 1 Analog to Digital Conversion  Introduction  Main characteristics –Resolution –Dynamic range –Bandwidth –Conversion.
Digital Correlated Double Sampling for ZTF Roger Smith and Stephen Kaye California Institute of Technology The digital equivalent of dual slope integration.
Hall C Meeting January 2008 Juliette M. Mammei Virginia Tech for the Qweak Collaboration Funded by NSF, DOE, SURA, NSFGRF, VT Cunningham Qweak: A Search.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
Preliminary Design of Calorimeter Electronics Shudi Gu June 2002.
Understanding ADC Specifications September Definition of Terms 000 Analogue Input Voltage Digital Output Code FS1/2.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
TRIUMF Qweak Electronics Des Ramsay Nov Status of Electronics November, 2008  36 VME modules (# 001 and # ) delivered to JLab  001, 003,
Prototype Test of SPring-8 FADC Module Da-Shung Su Wen-Chen Chang 02/07/2002.
Q weak Overview and Target Status Silviu Covrig Hall C for the Q weak Collaboration Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group November 10, 2008.
Vector Modulator AMC board Marcin Smelkowski Warsaw University od Technology PERG – ISE Presentation is based on „Draft.
Mircea Bogdan, NSS2005 Oct , 2005 – Windham El Conquistador Resort, Puerto Rico1 Simultaneous Sampling ADC Data Acquisition System for the QUIET.
K.C.RAVINDRAN,GRAPES-3 EXPERIMENT,OOTY 1 Development of fast electronics for the GRAPES-3 experiment at Ooty K.C. RAVINDRAN On Behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Low Energy Tests of the Standard Model Emlyn Hughes Spin 2004 Trieste October 14, 2004 *PAST *PRESENT *FUTURE.
HBD FEM the block diagram preamp – FEM cable Status Stuffs need to be decided….
Advisors Dr. Liguang Tang ( Dr. Dave Mack ( Nuruzzaman ( APS April Meeting.
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
A.K. Opper June 2004 The Q p Weak Experiment: “A Search for New Physics at the TeV Scale Via a Measurement of the Proton’s Weak Charge” 63 People at: JLab,
Leo Greiner PIXEL Hardware meeting HFT PIXEL detector LVDS Data Path Testing.
HBD FEE test result summary + production schedule 16mv test pulse result –5X attenuator + 20:1 resistor divider at input (to reduce the noise on the test.
Alexei SemenovGeneric Digitizer Generic Digitizer 10MHZ 16 bit 6U VME Board.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
MOLLER DAQ Aug 2015 meeting Team : R. Michaels, P. M. King, M. Gericke, K. Kumar R. Michaels, MOLLER Meeting, Aug, 2015.
False asymmetries/Ground Loops David Bowman 4/27/12.
Present Uses of the Fermilab Digital Signal Receiver VXI Module Brian Chase,Paul Joireman, Philip Varghese RF Embedded Systems (LLRF) Group.
SPIROC update Felix Sefkow Most slides from Ludovic Raux HCAL main meeting April 18, 2007.
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
Slide 1Turisini M. Frontend Electronics M.Turisini, E. Cisbani, P. Musico CLAS12 RICH Technical Review, 2013 June Requirements 2.Description of.
HAPPEX DAQ / ADC Tests Luis Mercado UMASS 4/17/09.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.
S. Bota – Calorimeter Electronics overview - July 2002 Status of SPD electronics Very Front End Review of ASIC runs What’s new: RUN 4 and 5 Next Actions.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
SVD FADC Status Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) Wetzlar SVD-PXD Meeting, 5 February 2013.
"North American" Electronics
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
DCH FEE STATUS Level 1 Triggered Data Flow FEE Implementation &
KLOE II Inner Tracker FEE
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Readout electronics for aMini-matrix DEPFET detectors
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
R&D activity dedicated to the VFE of the Si-W Ecal
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
Data Acquisition (DAQ) Status
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
A Low Power Readout ASIC for Time Projection Chambers in 65nm CMOS
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE
BESIII EMC electronics
Polarized Source Development Run Results
EEG Probe Project Grant G. Connell.
RPC Front End Electronics
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
Presentation transcript:

Current Mode Electronics for the Qweak Experiment Des Ramsay University of Manitoba/TRIUMF Qweak Collaboration Meeting TRIUMF, Vancouver October

Synthetic Quartz Scintillator Bars Shielding Wall Toroidal Magnet Liquid Hydrogen Target Electron Beam Layout of the Qweak Experiment Front-end electronics in extra shielding behind the wall

800 MHz 50 p.e. per event x ,000 e per event 6.4  A 6.4 V VME digital signal integrator 1 M  I-V to DAQ in shieldingoutside hall Nature of the Current Mode Signals shot noise:

I-V Preamplifier specs Gain: V out /I in = 1 M  with option of up to 10 M . Set by switches on board. Output: 0 to +10V. Adjustable  2V offset. Drives 130 m RG-213 Input: 10  A range. (e.g. +1  A to -9  A with +1 V offset.) Tolerates 5m of RG-62 on input. (Noise set primarily by length of input cable.) Bandwidth: f 3db = 30 kHz. (settles to <10 -4 in 50  s) Density: two amplifiers per module (one per detector bar). Uses 5 V DC Supply. Ground fully isolated by internal DC-DC converter. BNC connectors. Center conductor negative on input. Small size for ease of shielding.

MK1 Preamplifier at TRIUMF

Offset adjust Chan 1 Chan 2 Out IN Chan 1 gain Chan 2 gain +5 V DC MM MM MK2 Preamplifier Reduced power supply noise Switchable gains

Noise Measurements on Preamps Noise measured using x200, 50 kHz 5-pole amp, scope 500 kSPS Noise referred to preamp output. Used various lengths of RG-58C/U on input – measured capacitance. Compare to shot noise (for 1 M  ) :  70,000  V beam on  10,000  V LED test  300  V best-case battery test Noise in  V rms C in (pf) Measured Pspice open Gain (M  ) Noise (  V rms ) Channel Channel MK M  gain MK pf

four 1 ms integrals target bubbling not seen on few ms time scale T settle should be short to minimize dead time one spin state – (1/250) second 1 ms t next spin state  50  s settling time (not to scale) Q weak “1 kHz” Integration Scheme

Existing Gzero Ion Source Signals signals derived from 20 MHz crystal clock. Qweak integrator should use this clock as well Integration triggered by MPS (is present form OK?)

Integration time software selectable 1/300 s to 1/30 s To be set as a fixed number of samples. Integration triggered by external NIM signal (e.g. MPS) Triggers a selected time after leading edge and runs for pre-set number of samples. Clocked by 20 MHz NIM signal from ion source. Divided by pre-scale to get sample rate. Full differential high-impedance input provides common mode noise rejection. 50 kHz, 5-pole anti-aliasing filter. 18 bit ADC,  500 ksps. Four 32-bit sums per integral available to DAQ on VME. No dead time between the four periods. Buffered output permits reading previous integral during integration. Eight integrators per single width VME. TRIUMF Current Mode VME Integrator

VME registers Sample period multiplier, k. Sample period = k*(1/sys_clock) Number of samples per block, I Number of sample blocks, m. m = 1, 2, 4. Gate to Trigger Delay, n. Delay = n*(1/sys_clock). Gate source, EXT/INT. System Clock source, EXT/INT. Block integration time = k*l*(1/sys_clock). Total integration time = k*l*m*(1/sys_clock). (In the FPGA it may be simpler to do 4 sample blocks and a total at all times.) Data Readout Sequence number. Shows if a measurement has been lost or skipped. Block 1-4 sums. 32 bit. Total sum. 32 bit. Total number of samples actually taken -- Should equal k*l*m. Valid data flag or new data ready flag. Data buffer empty flag, if the data is buffered. VME section details

Outstanding Questions PREAMPS: What radiation dose will they take? (Dave Mack is testing one) What gain range should we use on the production amps? (MK2 has 1,2,5,10 and 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 for evaluation.) Where, exactly, should we mount them? INTEGRATORS: Are we using 1/250 s spin states, and is 50  s settling time reasonable? Is ion source clock 20 MHz and can we get it as a NIM signal.? Is MPS good as a trigger and can we get it as a NIM signal?

approximate signal with samples Q = (average I)(T) band limit signal to small fraction of sampling frequency to eliminate the wiggles and kinks. we impose an analog cutoff at 1/10 the sampling frequency Integral From Samples (rectangular rule) 12 3 n … T = n  t t I tt

Averaging of Digitization Noise The 18 bit ADCs have ~0.5 LSB rms noise per sample. This is reduced by averaging ~500 samples per integration. This will only work if raw signal spreads over enough channels. Assuming equivalent noise bandwidth 47 kHz (f 3db = 30 kHz) and 18 bit ADC at mid range: condition Q rms noise before channels channels (e) integration (  ) (FWHM) beam ON 50, mV LED test 1, mV battery test mV  So this is OK even for very quiet signals.

rms noise on a 1 ms integral Condition noise (ppm) beam-ON shot noise 1120 shot noise during LED tests 160 shot noise during battery tests 5 preamplifier noise 2 digital integrator noise 1-2 Comparison of Different Noise Sources

chan 1 chan 2 Input side Output side megohms Channel 1 is shown set for 1 M  and channel 2 for 0.5 M  To change gain move the set switch back towards the input side and move the one you want towards the output side. Note the gains increase away from the center. The offset is set for 1.0 volts when shipped, but can be changed with the offset pot To open the preamp for adjustment, remove the hex nuts from the OUTPUT side and remove the black screws from the INPUT side. Changing gains and offset on the TRIUMF MK2 preamp

Qweak Collaboration Spokespersons Bowman, J. David - Los Alamos National Laboratory Carlini, Roger (Principal Investigator) - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Finn, J. Michael - College of William and Mary Kowalski, Stanley - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page, Shelley - University of Manitoba Qweak Collaboration Members Armstrong, David - College of William and Mary Averett, Todd - College of William and Mary Birchall, James - University of Manitoba Botto, Tancredi - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Bruell, Antje - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Chattopadhyay, Swapan - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Davis, Charles - TRIUMF Doornbos, J. - TRIUMF Dow, Karen - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dunne, James - Mississippi State University Ent, Rolf - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Erler, Jens - University of Mexico Falk, Willie - University of Manitoba Farkhondeh, Manouchehr - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Forest, Tony - Louisiana Tech University Franklin, Wilbur - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gaskell, David - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Grimm, Klaus - College of William and Mary Hagner, Caren - Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ. Hersman, F. W. - University of New Hampshire Holtrop, Maurik - University of New Hampshire Johnston, Kathleen - Louisiana Tech University Jones, Richard - University of Connecticut Joo, Kyungseon - University of Connecticut Keppel, Cynthia - Hampton University Khol, Michael - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Korkmaz, Elie - University of Northern British Columbia Lee, Lawrence - TRIUMF Liang, Yongguang - Ohio University Lung, Allison - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Mack, David - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Majewski, Stanislaw - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Mammei, Juliette - Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ. Mammei, Russell - Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ. Mitchell, Gregory - Los Alamos National Laboratory Mkrtchyan, Hamlet - Yerevan Physics Institute Morgan, Norman - Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ. Opper, Allena - Ohio University Penttila, Seppo - Los Alamos National Laboratory Pitt, Mark - Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ. Poelker, B. (Matt) - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Porcelli, Tracy - University of Northern British Columbia Ramsay, William - University of Manitoba Ramsey-Musolf, Michael - California Institute of Technology Roche, Julie - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Simicevic, Neven - Louisiana Tech University Smith, Gregory - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Smith, Timothy - Dartmouth College Suleiman, Riad - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Taylor, Simon - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Tsentalovich, Evgeni - Massachusetts Institute of Technology van Oers, W.T.H. - University of Manitoba Wells, Steven - Louisiana Tech University Wilburn, W.S. - Los Alamos National Laboratory Wood, Stephen Thomas - Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Zhu, Hongguo - University of New Hampshire Zorn, Carl - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Zwart, Townsend - Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Shot Noise one-sided shot noise, [A 2 ] equivalent noise bandwidth [Hz] or charge quantum [C] current [A] Example, 1 ms integration with beam on, assuming 800 MHz: Q = 50,000 e I = 6.4  A (800 MHz x 50,000 e) B = 500 Hz i n = 7.2 nA rms (7.2 mV with a 1 M  preamp) Note that in 1 ms, N = 8 x 10 5 counts. = 1120 ppm, same as 7.2 nA/6.4  A

Q weak Front End Electronics

four 1/120 second integrals multiples of 60 Hz cancel in sum individual integrals show if 60 Hz (or odd harmonics) was present one spin state – (1/30) second (1/120) t next spin state  200  s settling time (not to scale) Old “120 Hz” Q weak Integration Scheme

Block Diagram of Current Mode Electronics

Prototype Dual Preamplifier

time current 3.6 pA (0.6 ppm p-p) ( ppm) 6  A helicity Size of Q weak Signal figure shows regular spin flip; in practice use or for 50 kHz noise bandwidth, rms shot noise is 70 nA on a scope the noise band would be  100,000 x the signal !

charge counts Q0Q0 - helicity+ helicity charge ADC error +s -s ADC reads S channels low below Q 0 and jumps to S channels high above Q 0 This causes the measured asymmetry to depart from the real asymmetry, A 0, by an amount, where  is in channels. The DNL won’t introduce an asymmetry when none is there, it only changes an existing one. Differential Nonlinearity (DNL) Example

Summary of Electronics Needs

DSP eprom external trigger serial port (diagnostic) channel 1 channel 2 TRIUMF E761 VME Module

Number of samples Offset Sample rate Calibration

-16-bit ADC - DSP summing - calibration mode - channel offset and gain - takes N samples when triggered - adjustable delay from trigger - delivers gate during integration - features can be programmed TRIUMF Parity 2 module