Part-financed by the European Union Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource Bo Löwendal, Sweden Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland.
BlackSea Region Meeting Varna Points raised by the EU Maritime Strategy of relevance for PlanCoast.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Anders Lindholm European Commission DG Regional Policy, Territorial Cooperation.
EuropeAid European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Cross Border Co-operation within the Baltic Sea Region Programme Hamburg, May 2007 Martin.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
LVBC 3 RD LAKE VICTORIA BASIN DONORS’ CONFERENCE Round Table Three Economic and Infrastructure Development Lily Kisaka.
Izolda Bulvinaite, European Commission ,DG MARE, E1
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
A new horizontal action New political conditions More strategic use of EU funds Baltic Sea vulnerability Great potential for growth EU wants to take.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
BSSSC AND COOPERATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION ANN IRENE SAETERNES, International coordinator EASTERN NORWAY COUNTY NETWORK.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat.
Lithuanian Integrated Marine Science, Studies and Business Centre (Valley) Zita Gasiūnaitė Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Klaipėda University.
Adaptation to Climate Change Guidance to Programming Opportunities Energy and Environment Practice Meeting September, 2005 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Baltic Sea Region (BSR) Transnational Programme (Interreg IVB) and its strategic projects BaltMet Inno Brainstorming Workshop, 7 November 2007,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Palanga,
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
Project Part-financed by the European Union Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Project presentation at the StratMoS conference,
Integration of Baltic Sea science Kaisa Kononen PhD, Executive Director Baltic Organisations Network for Funding Science EEIG.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
Objectives, Priorities and Concepts. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Operational Programme outlines the framework, strategy and management of the programme for.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Lead Partner.
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region programme 2007 – 2013 by Joint Secretariat.
Environmental Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region: views of the Ministry of the Environment of Estonia Andres Kratovitš Tallinn, 27 April 2005.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
Black Sea NGO Forum, 8th edition, Tbilisi Blue Growth in the Black Sea What is it about? Relevance for the environment Role of the civil society Funding.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
ICZM PROTOCOL INDICATORS THE MEDITERRANEAN PROTOCOL ON INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT: What indicators are needed? Marko PREM Director a.i.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
EfficienSea – Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea TKI –toiminnan teemapäivä Kymenlaakson ammattikorkeakoulussa
Part-financed by the European Union Workshop 1 Fostering innovations Moderation: Susann Henning, Managing Authority Baltic Sea Region Programme
WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Overall aim: to engage national bodies, sectors and researchers in dialogue.
VASAB Ministerial Conference Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat 8-9 September 2014 Bergen PartiSEApate Partners Meeting PartiSEApate Partners Meeting.
Project period: partners Budget: Euro Focus : Risk management, spatial development Trans-national capacity (exercises, training,
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
Lithuanian Integrated Marine Science, Studies and Business Centre (Valley) Zita Gasiūnaitė Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Klaipėda University.
GEF Danube-Black Sea Strategic Partnership for Nutrient Reduction Strategic Partnerships for GEF IW Mainstreaming GPA in Transboundary Basins and LMEs.
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Integrated Coastal and Watershed Management: The Caribbean SIDS Experience GEF 3 rd Biennial International Waters Conference Salvador, Bahia, Brazil 20.
Freeware application found on Google play – download and install Could be used on Android, iPad, iPhone and Mac.
Horizontal Action Climate Warsaw, 29 October 2015 Council of the Baltic Sea States Krista Kampus, Head of Baltic 21 Unit EUSBSR HA CLIMATE Coordinator.
South-East European Space
Cross Border Cooperation under ENPI
Task 1.2 Review existing and new financing instruments relevant for MSFD implementation.
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
Territorial Co-operation
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Technical Press Briefing LIFE Sub-programme for Climate Action Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) 12 December 2011.
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Arafura and Timor Seas Region
Presentation transcript:

Part-financed by the European Union Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource Bo Löwendal, Sweden Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering Committee Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007 – 2013 Conference Hamburg May 2007

Presentation Outline: The background of Priority Priority objective Areas of support with examples Financing: available funds and co-financing rates The system of indicators Common and priority specific results

The background of Priority (1) STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Well developed monitoring system on the environmental quality of the Baltic Sea Good scientific knowledge base for management of the marine environment Established integrated coastal zone management and river basin practices at the local and regional level as a good potential for transnational co-operation Great nature values of European interest, relatively high quality of environment (incl. vast forest areas) and important cultural heritage Lack of joint actions and action plans to prevent and to combat land-based marine pollution (nutrification of arable land and ground waters, leaky wastes disposal areas, insufficient waste water treatment) resulting, among others, in eutrophication of sea waters, oxygen depletion at the Baltic Sea bottom and high level of dioxins in fish Lack of well coordinated joint plans to prevent and to respond to maritime accidents, incl. oil spills and contamination by hazardous substances Lack of transnational co-operation and joint planning in usage of Baltic Sea space and in minimalisation of risks caused by natural disasters

The background of Priority (2) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS Growing awareness of the poor status of the Baltic Sea environment Good natural and cultural heritage incentives to develop pan-Baltic tourism products as a measure for the BSR branding Good quality of the marine environment as an asset to fish stocks EU Marine Strategy Directive giving a higher status to protection of the marine environment and regional co- operation EU Maritime Policy, EU Green Paper on a future EU policy Uncontrolled exploration of marine resources leading to environmental hazards and/or use conflicts Lack of political commitment and low harmonisation of national management plans and legislation related to the marine environment Insufficiently prepared administrative personnel at regional and national level to adapt and implement UE regulations on ICZM and marine environment Economic development needs overriding other interests and weakening efforts to safeguard sustainable development of the Baltic Sea and its catchment area Natural disasters such as rising sea level, flooding, forest fires etc.

The objective is to improve the management of the Baltic Sea resources in order to achieve its better environmental state The goal is to learn more and to practice jointly a knew knowledge on: How to ensure effective and efficient water management How to utilise resources for the economic development of the regions without harming the marine ecosystems (gathering the knowledge, integration) How to mitigate the impacts of the regions economic development (preparedness and response, as well as capacity building) How to prepare the regions for the avoidable consequences of the global climate change (awareness raising, preparedness)

Areas of support: 1. Water management with special attention to challenges caused by increasing economic activities and climate changes 2. Economic management of open sea areas and sustainable use of marine resources 3. Enhanced maritime safety 4. Integrated development of off-shore and coastal areas

Area 1. Water management with special attention to challenges caused by increasing economic activities and climate changes (1) Actions and strategies to improve water management in the Baltic Sea and its catchment area New technologies and solutions for water treatment based on the pooling of existing experience in the BSR Identification of weak links/bottlenecks in the water treatment systems currently in use in order to increase their efficiency followed by concrete investments

Area 1. Water management with special attention to challenges caused by increasing economic activities and climate changes (2) Actions to prevent transboundary pollution, including nuclear radiation, and to promote environmental management and standards Actions, action plans, strategies and legislative frameworks for improved water management in order to minimise impacts of climate change Actions and solutions for improved protection of valuable marine resources

Area 2. Economic management of open sea areas and sustainable use of marine resources Preparation of strategies, actions and pilot investments for using marine resources, e.g. in the field of advanced technologies in marine culture (aquaculture), exploitation of gas hydrates, offshore wind energy, fish breeding, use of biomass, exploration of underwater tourism potentials etc. Actions oriented towards sensitivity mapping of the Baltic Sea space resulting in visualisation of investigated potential of marine resources as well as in detection of possible conflict areas

Area 3. Enhanced maritime safety Application of strategies, tools and methods to minimise environmental risks resulting from both natural hazards and human activities Actions and investments to enhance preparedness and response on the sea in case of accidents or spills Joint strategies and actions to increase reliability of maritime transport in the Baltic Sea

Area 4. Integrated development of off-shore and coastal areas Harmonisation of national management plans on marine environment and joint transnational implementation of their relevant parts Streamlining of national efforts towards development of the off-shore planning standards Development and implementation of integrated coastal zone management aiming at competence building at regional and national level Preparation of scenarios, adaptation strategies and intervention plans towards mitigation of impacts of climate change on coastal areas

Available funds: Co-financing rates: Up to 50 % for Norwegian partners Up to 75 % for partners from: Denmark, Finland, Germany and Sweden Up to 85 % for partners from: Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia and Poland Up to 90 % for RU/BY partners Up to 50 % for partners located outside programme eligible area except from 75% co-financing rate for the whole Land Lower Saxony ERDF + Norwegian = 30 % of 208 MEURca 62.4 MEUR ENPI 4.0 MEUR

The system of indicators: To measure achievements of the programme the system of indicators has been established and defined in the Operational Programme The system is based on a set of expected results accompanied by respective outputs. There are two types of expected results for each priority: common and priority specific ones Each project must: address at least one common and one specific result, and define indicator for the addressed results’ achievement quantify outputs

Common results in the priority 3 Increased political recognition for transnational solutions improving the management of Baltic Sea resources Increased sustainability of co-operative networks aiming at improved management of the Baltic Sea Unlocking public /private investments aimed at the improvement of Baltic Sea management

Specific results of the priority 3: Improved institutional capacity and effectiveness in water management in the Baltic Sea Improved institutional capacity in dealing with hazards and risks, including climate change Increased sustainable economic potential of marine resources Influenced policies, strategies, action plans and/or regulations in the field of management of Baltic Sea as a common resource