MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND INITIATIVES FOR THE PROMOTION OF QUALITY: THE PROCESS OF REVISION AND IMPROVEMENT Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Faculty.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
How to Cope With the European Standards and Guidelines at the Institutional Level and How to Benefit from the Standards Henrik Toft Jensen Roskilde University.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND INTERNATIONALISATION: THE BSU EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPING THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) TEMPUS-2008-DE-JPGR BSU QATMI team:
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
Pavol Jozef Šafárik University Košice, Slovakia EUA Doctoral Programme Project SWOT analysis on Quality Structures (Cultures, Processes) Eva Čellárová.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
Assuring the quality of distance education at higher education institutions at Western Balkan Radojka Krneta University of Kragujevac, Technical Faculty.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 DoQuP Standards for QA of SPs in PCs 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes DoQuP standards for.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Alicante 24-26/4/2013 Organization for QA 1 2 nd DoQuP Training Seminar University of Alicante, April 2013 Aim of the Seminar Alfredo Squarzoni University.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
STRATEGIC IMPACT OF THE PROJECT RESULTS AT INSTITUTION LEVEL Eva Jankovichová Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Faculty of Civil Engineering.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
1 QUALTITY ASSURANCE The Ministry of higher education in Syria THE ROUNDTABLE MEETING OF QUALTITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES OF THE ORGANIZATION OF ISAMIC CONFERENCE.
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Maja Bozovic University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
THE REVISION PROCESS FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering ■ Eva Jankovichová.
LOGO Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World Languages Tempus Project TEMPUS IT-SMGR - DOQUP Documentation for.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
Bishkek 3/5/2011 QA of SPs in Italy 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes National Standards for Quality Assurance.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Bratislava 10-12/10/2012 1st DoQuP Training Seminar Seminar Introduction 1 Training Seminar Methodologies and procedures of definition, gathering, elaboration.
Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoQuP Presentation 1 Presentation of the Tempus Project Number TEMPUS IT-TEMPUS-SMGR ( / ) “Documentation.
Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
ENCHASE “ENHANCING ALBANIAN SYSTEM OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: APPLICATION OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME BASED METHODOLOGY ”
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Quality Assurance Systems: QMS: The UEF’s experience Yohama Puentes HEI ICI project: End seminar
EU TOOLS FOR TRASPARENCY: THE IMPACT OF EQF ON ITALIAN E&T SYSTEM Rome 7 October 2013.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Analysis of current state in internationalization from the accreditation aspect of HEIs Maja.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
Higher Education in Azerbaijan Quality Assurance Arrangements Helsinki, 10 June 2016.
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Europe
Introduction to the training
Evaluation of Teaching Process and Students Experience
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
Presentation transcript:

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering ■ Eva Jankovichová ■ Spain, Alicante, April 2013

Contents ● Policy Context of QA ● Principles and Procedures of Quality Assurance ● Quality Management System ● Implementation of QMS ● The Organizational Structure ● Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ● Annex No. 1

Policy Context of QA In the Slovak Republic the responsibility for higher education as regards the competences of the State administration bodies falls under the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic ● which pursuant to the Act on Higher Education, ● creates conditions for development of HEIs and university education, ● takes responsibility for updating and development of legislation in the field of higher education.

Policy Context of QA Slovak Higher Education System offers ● an education on all three levels, in both forms of study - the part-time and full-time ● it is provided by - public (20), state (3), private (12), foreign (4) HEIs, - professional-type (21) and university-type (18)

Policy Context of QA ● The current system of the QA in the Slovak HEIs is based on the criteria implemented by the Accreditation Commission which is an advisory body of the Slovak Government. They start from internal the European Standards and Guidelines for QA (ESG) and create a base for the external accreditation process.

Policy Context of QA ● The European University Association (EUA) performed systematic evaluation of the Slovak HEIs based on requirements of the Ministry of Education of the SR as well as the Slovak Rectors´ Conference in Its aim was to motivate the HEIs to follow the best QA standards and practice and tailor them to their individual conditions.

Policy Context of QA ● The Academic Ranking and Rating Agency (ARRA) as an independent rating agency was established in Its main activities are aimed at the regular QA in education and research areas within Slovak HEIs.

Principles and Procedures of Quality Assurance ● Strategy, policy and procedures should have a formal status and be publicly available. ● In the definition of the policy is expected description: - the relationship between teaching and research at university,

Principles and Procedures of Quality Assurance ● In the definition of the policy is expected description: - strategies HEIs in the field of quality and standards, - organization the quality assurance system,

Principles and Procedures of Quality Assurance - responsibilities of departments, institutions, faculties and other organizational units and individuals in the field of quality assurance, - involvement of students in quality assurance, - methods of implementation, monitoring and revision of policy.

Quality Management System ● Quality assurance and quality assessment in HE over the last decade has become an integral part of higher management. ● Includes in particular: - the provision, - management, - monitoring, - evaluation

Quality Management System The main principles of quality management system of education at the Slovak University of Technology: 1. quality of SPs of education and student work can be continuously improved, 2. responsibility for the supply and delivery of quality education,

Quality Management System 3. assessing of quality education must be performed by a group of internal and external evaluators, It is possible to build on the principles: a) customer orientation, b) the principle of leadership, (management of universities and colleges ensure unity of mission, goals and direction for the development of the University)

Quality Management System c) involvement of all staff, d) process approach, e) system approach, (process integration creates conditions for synergistic use of existing resources of the University) f) continuous improvement of the educational environment and process,

Quality Management System g) decisions based on facts, arguments and feedback, h) relationships between all stakeholders (participants) of the educational process at the university (faculty). Source: [1] Principles of the QMS of Education on SUT in Bratislava, February 2006, p. 3

Implementation of QMS The sequence of steps: 1. Identify the stakeholders of the educational process. Who is the customer of university? It is possible in principle to define three types of customers: - customer is a student - customer is the labor market - customer is the State (Ministry of Education)

Implementation of QMS 2. Create a policy of quality education and formulate its quality objectives. 3. Determine the responsible persons and competencies. 4. Determine standards of education and establish criteria for quality of the educational process.

Implementation of QMS 5.Identify indicators and methods for monitoring, measuring and evaluating the quality of education. 6.Suggest content and timetable for the evaluation process and QMS and develop an evaluation scenario and procedures for faculty, departments and assessment teams. 7.Determine procedures (corrective action) for preventing and improving the quality of education.

The Organizational Structure At the university level: Rector - has the primary responsibility for the quality of education - appoints the Commission for the Quality Management System of education at the University (UC)

The Organizational Structure UK of QMS will be responsible for: ● overall concept of quality management at the University, ● coordinating the work of faculty committees for QMS, ● establish criteria of QE at university level, ● issue of the management guidelines for faculty and the review teams (internal evaluation) and ensuring the external evaluation.

The Organizational Structure At the faculty level: Dean - has the primary responsibility for the quality of education - appoints the Commission for the Quality Management System of education at the Faculty (FC)

The Organizational Structure FK of QMS will be responsible for: ● implementation of the quality management in the Faculty, ● coordinating the work of the commissions for SPs, ● support and coordinate the work of external evaluators, ● approval of the new programs.

The Organizational Structure Commission for study programs will be responsible for: ■ annual monitoring of the existing programs, ■ agreed periodic review of the existing programs, ■ preparation of materials for external evaluators,

The Organizational Structure Commission for study programs will be responsible for: ■ preparation of materials for approval of the new programs, ■ methodological instruction of departments, ■ create a database of questions for revision SPs ■ obtaining feedback and opinions from graduates, employers, etc.

The Organizational Structure The purpose of periodic internal and external evaluation of the educational process is: ● introduced in the universities and colleges usual standard and evaluation criteria of major foreign educational institutions, ● analyze whether education has the prescribed quality and encourage improvement of QE ● evaluate the students learning experiences

The Organizational Structure The purpose of periodic internal and external evaluation of the educational process is: ● exchange good practical knowledge between study programs in colleges and universities, ● publishing evaluation reports publicly available information on the quality of all grades forms of education that a university and a faculty offering.

The Organizational Structure Principles of evaluation of SPs: - is based on self-assessment, - used the most current documentation material, - is based on the existing or QMS created by the organizational structures, - is designed to guarantee objectivity and external aspects. Source: [1] Principles of the QMS of Education on SUT in Bratislava, February 2006, p. 5

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ● In 2012, Slovakia was among the first countries involved in the project AHELO, which has an ambition to compare the quality of higher education on five continents. ● In the project to quality assessment higher education AHELO have signed up 19 HEIs. Source:[2] prihlasilo-19-slovenskych-vysokych-skol /

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ● In 2012 the Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava obtained the ECTS Label - is a prestigious certificate, - credit system is compatible with European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) - enabling two-way student mobility within EU universities and the wider European area

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ● All of the study programmes provided by the Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, all exams and credits that students receive are in line with European Credit System and thus recognized abroad. ● Obtaining the ECTS Label is a signal of quality for domestic and foreign students. Source: [3]

■ Thank you very much for your attention. ■ Eva Jankovichová ■