Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network Operations Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

1 of 17 Information Strategy The Features of an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy The.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS4 Technical Assistance.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
© EUROCONTROL 2013 – Network Management Operations Centre (NMOC/CFMU) Integration of the Airport into the Network Benefits Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
© EUROCONTROL 2012 – Network Management Operations Centre (NMOC/CFMU) ENHANCED TACTICAL FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ETFMS) Hans Koolen EDITION 12/11/2012 WHY.
ETFMS - SYSTEM OVERVIEW
ENHANCED TACTICAL FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ETFMS)
ENHANCED TACTICAL FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ETFMS)
© EUROCONTROL 2013 – Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC/CFMU) BENEFITS OF FLIGHT ACTIVATION MONITORING Hans Koolen EDITION 16/01/2013.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
ATFM Priorities Evaluation Study Alison Hudgell QinetiQ
February 14, Help promote Plans for additional guidance materials Overview of new materials Provide feedback Agenda 2.
The RCP Health Research Support Service (HRSS) The approach to transitioning the HRSS Governance Framework : Presentation for the National Information.
Module 2 Sessions 10 & 11 Report Writing.
Civil-Military coordination in France
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Project Scope Management
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Program design overview Pre-contract to post-program year Office on Volunteerism and Community Service.
Test plans. Test Plans A test plan states: What the items to be tested are At what level they will be tested What sequence they are to be tested in How.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
1 Functional specification: data exchange standards Pre-sessional consultations on registries 2 June 2003 Bonn, Germany Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat.
Service Modelling Team (SMT#3) Topic: Service Architecture Walter Van Hamme WP8 contributor 7 May 2014.
Ensuring a 'Flexible Use of Airspace'….
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
System Testing 2  Effective March 3, 2014, new requirements for system testing were implemented  State Agencies are now required to provide to FNS:
Staff Concerns and Complaints Administrative Policy GBK Updated 07/31/
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-15/PIA 1 Improve Traffic Flow Through Runway Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-30/PIA-2 Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information.
Episode 3 Operational Concept Detailing Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Ros Eveleigh & Eliana Haugg EUROCONTROL & DFS Episode 3 Brussels,
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Course Technology Chapter 3: Project Integration Management.
International Civil Aviation Organization Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP05.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-25/PIA-2 Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Regional ATFM in Europe
3 – 4 September 2015 Delhi, India Piyawut Tantimekabut (Toon)
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
1 Key elements of a good project ECVET contact seminar October 2010 Brussels LEONARDO DA VINCI.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Capacity Development for CDM - Egypt, Second National Workshop - Phase II - Cairo, January 2004.
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Objective AOP05.
© EUROCONTROL 2016 – Network Manager Operations Centre (NMOC) Integration of Airport and the Network Benefits Hans Koolen NMOC Network Operations Services.
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Airport-ANSP Growth & Efficiency ACDM-CATFM
LSSIP Objective AOP05 Note: objective postponed 12 months in ESSIP Plan Edition 2015.
Documentation (1/4) Airport CDM Manual
RAD Evolution Workshop Network Approach to the RAD - DP/4
Documentation (1/4) Airport CDM Manual
‘BOAT CHART’ PROJECT WORKPLAN
RAD Evolution Workshop Outcome
Presentation transcript:

Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network Operations Services A-CDM – Integration of Airport into the Network Implementation Steps & Status Edition June 2012 Hans Koolen NMOC/CFMU Network Operations Services

Purpose of presentation Introduction Purpose of presentation To describe which implementation steps are applicable for Integrating a CDM airport into the Network via DPI and FUM messages. To provide the latest available planning information Target Audience Management Airport CDM Project Team All others who would like to have a global overview of the planning

AGENDA Introduction DPI/FUM Implementation Steps Last available planning info

Airport CDM Integration Plan A-CDM is implemented in phases It is a Cooperation between: At the airport: AO, handler, Airport, ATC/TWR EUROCONTROL: Airport CDM-team, NMOC/CFMU The process requires: Clear roles & responsibilities of EUROCONTROL Identification of clear & transparent criteria The process has been defined together by APT and NMOC/CFMU

DPI/FUM Implementation Procedure Decision Gap Analysis Completeness Assessment Elements (1 - 5) CBA DPI Message Go No Decision NMOC/CFMU Operational Evaluation Not Ready Advice Airport Interest in Airport CDM Information More Analysis Operational DPI Transmission to NMOC/CFMU Phase DPI Operational Evaluation Phase DPI Element * * The technical support for the DPI element can be implemented e ither in parallel with elements 1 5 or after their completion Local Airport CDM Operating Status CDM Airport

Five A-CDM Implementation Phases Information Phase NMOC/CFMU provides general info about DPI/FUM and NMOC/CFMU’s role in the A-CDM project Analysis Phase NMOC/CFMU does not actively participate but is ready to answer to questions if necessary. Implementation Phase NMOC/CFMU provides DPI implementation details NMOC/CFMU and Airport CDM Project team draft DPI-ICD Airport CDM platform software is updated with DPI/FUM processing NMOC/CFMU and Airport CDM Project team agree planning of the DPI Operational Evaluation Phase DPI Operational Evaluation Phase Before start: Evaluate CDM Completeness Criteria Evaluate DPI messages Put DPIs into operations

CDM Implementation Phases (1/3) Information Phase Information Collection Airport is interested in A-CDM Decision to analyse the options Gap Analysis CBA Decision to Implement A-CDM Analysis Phase Mainly Airport CDM Activities – NMOC/CFMU provides information

CDM Implementation Phases (2/3) Decision to implement Airport CDM Implement CDM Elements 1 to 5 Implement FUM (local) CDM in Operations Implement DPI CDM Completeness Assessment Not yet Ready Ready Decision to start DPI transmission to NMOC/CFMU Implementation Phase Activity managed by Airport CDM with support from NMOC/CFMU

DPI Implementation Steps First Information Exchange Development of the DPI-ICD FUM used by A-CDM Validation of Local Data accuracy and Timelines DPI Operational Evaluation Communication and Message Syntax Evaluation of Live Data ATFCM Impact Assessment Operational Trial DPIs Fully operational

DPI Implementation Steps First Information Exchange Development of DPI-ICD Validation of Local Data Accuracy and Timelines FUM used by A-CDM DPI Operational Evaluation DPIs Operational at NMOC/CFMU

First Information Exchange Purpose NMOC/CFMU provides Global Overview of DPI/FUM messages. Airport provides overview of the A-CDM project. First contact between the A-CDM project team and the NMOC/CFMU team. When After the A-CDM project has been approved The A-CDM project wants to include DPI/FUM into the project planning Duration 1 day meeting Required participants A-CDM project team (preferably a representative of each stakeholder such as Airport, ATC-TWR ATC-FMP, AO,…) NMOC/CFMU staff

Development of the DPI-ICD Purpose NMOC/CFMU provides DPI messages implementation details. NMOC/CFMU provides detailed presentation on the DPI Operational Evaluation process. NMOC/CFMU and A-CDM project team start drafting the DPI-ICD. When When the A-CDM project is approaching the implementation phase. Before the A-CDM software requirements for the DPI messages are written. Duration Start with a 1-2 day meeting Finalisation of the DPI-ICD is estimated to take 1-2 months Required participants A-CDM project team, especially TWR OPS staff, FMP representative, Software Requirements Specialist. NMOC/CFMU staff

Required participants FUM used by A-CDM Purpose NMOC/CFMU will provide FUM on request. The A-CDM team can send request to NMOC/CFMU. When After the A-CDM info sharing platform is ready to receive the FUM. Duration Provision of FUM can be arranged on short notice. Required participants A-CDM project Mgr. ODSG representative of ANSP concerned.

Validation of Local Data Accuracy and Timelines Purpose To assess accuracy of CDM Data Provision To prevent unnecessary long DPI Operational Evaluation See “CDM Completeness Criteria” in Airport CDM Manual. When After A-CDM has been put into operations. Before DPI Operational Evaluation is started. Duration Estimated duration: 1 week – 1 month. Required participants A-CDM project team to asses the Criteria. EUROCONTROL CND Airport team to discuss the Criteria.

CDM Completeness Criteria (1/2) Implement 5 Airport CDM Concept Elements Airport CDM Information Sharing Airport CDM Turn-around process – Miles Stones Approach Variable Taxi-Time (VTT) Calculation Collaborative Pre-Departure Sequence (TSAT) CDM in Adverse conditions Inclusion of the following major events in the CDM process Verification of the flight plan with the airport slot Establishment of the TOBT Issue of the TSAT Actual Off-Block Adherence to Operational Procedures CDM procedures documented in AIP and Airport Operating Instructions See Airport CDM Implementation Manual – Attachment 6

CDM Completeness Criteria (2/2) Accuracy & Coverage of the provided data DPIs received for at least 97% of the flights Accuracy of TTOT based upon TOBT <= 12min Accuracy of TTOT based upon TSAT <= 10min Accuracy of TTOT based upon AOBT <= 5min The accuracy of the provided TOTs must be for 95% of the flights during normal circumstances Adherence to ATFM Slots Must be 80% or better during the last month before the CDM Completeness Assessment Agreements MoU signed by all partners at the airport DPI-ICD with NMOC/CFMU agreed LoA with NMOC/CFMU ready

DPI Operational Evaluation Purpose To evaluate completeness and accuracy of DPI messages. See “DPI & FUM Implementation Roadmap” for details. When After local A-CDM has been put into operations. Before DPI messages are put into operations in NMOC/CFMU. Duration Estimated duration: 3-6 months. Required participants A-CDM project (OPS and ENG expertise). NMOC/CFMU (URB and OPS expertise).

CDM Implementation Phases (3/3) Decision to start DPI transmission to NMOC/CFMU DPI Operational Evaluation Phase System & Operations Improvements DPI Operational Evaluation Not yet Ready Ready Operations Activity managed by NMOC/CFMU

Required participants DPI in Operations Purpose To do the last preparations (admin). To put DPIs into operations (at NMOC/CFMU). When After successful DPI Operational Evaluation Duration Estimated duration: 1 month. Required participants A-CDM project team. NMOC/CFMU.

DPI Implementation Steps First Information Exchange Development of DPI-ICD Validation of Local Data Accuracy and Timelines FUM used by A-CDM DPI Operational Evaluation DPIs Operational at NMOC/CFMU

DPI Operational Evaluation – Major Steps Communication and Message Syntax Evaluation of Live Data ATFCM Impact Assessment Operational Trial Operations Post Operations Support

Operational Evaluation Phases 1. Communication and Message Syntax Purpose: Initial and quick verification of message syntax and connections in order to save time during testing with live data. How: transmission of copies of several DPI message types via e-mail and via AFTN. How Long: one or several e-mails and a few messages via AFTN. Report: feedback is given by NMOC/CFMU via e-mail.

Operational Evaluation Phases 2. Evaluation of Live Data Purpose: Determine accuracy and consistency of Live Data and suitability for ATFCM purposes. How: transmission of DPIs for operational traffic to the ETFMS OPS evaluation (test) system. How Long: initially 1 hour, later 24hours to several days. Report: initial feedback is given by NMOC/CFMU via e-mail. Later statistics reports will be produced and discussed with the airport concerned. Note that this phase may take several months dependent on the results of the first evaluations. It is required to have at least one long duration test of 7-14 days.

Operational Evaluation Phases 3. ATFCM Impact Assessment Purpose: Determine the impact of the provided DPIs on the ATCFM process managed by ETFMS. How: transmission of DPIs for operational traffic to the ETFMS OPS evaluation (test) system. How Long: at least 24 hours without interruption. Report: Analysis and reports will be done via the ETFMS standard HMI (count graphs, oplog query,..).

Operational Evaluation Phases 4. Operational Trial Purpose: to verify the correct working of DPI/FUM messages in a fully operational environment. How: transmission of DPIs for operational traffic to the ETFMS OPS system and FUMs to the airport OPS system. How Long: several hours on 2 different days. Report: Analysis and reports will be done via the ETFMS standard HMI (count graphs, oplog query,..) and via the airport CDM system.

Operational Evaluation Phases 5. Operations (prepare for…) Purpose: to organise a GoNoGo meeting and take the last actions for final operations How: Organise the meeting, do last actions. How Long: takes approximately 1 week. Report: Go or NoGo decision and completed action-list.

Operational Evaluation Phases 6. Post Operations Support Purpose: to learn from operations and to iron-out last problems How: Closely monitor operations and ensure the availability of Operations Support. How Long: approximately 2 weeks close monitoring and after that normal operations support. Report: Incident reports and others.

Summary - Evolutionary Approach

DPI Operational Evaluation Criteria DPI Quality Indicators DPI Completeness; i.e. DPIs for almost all flights DPI Update rate; i.e. sufficient nr of updates per flight DPI to Flight plan correlation; no DPIs for VFR/OAT flights Rejected/ignored DPIs; must be below 3% Filing time behaviour; must be as agreed in the ICD … DPI performance Indicators TOT predictability; must be better than flight plan predictability

AGENDA Implementation Phases CDM Completeness Criteria DPI Operational Evaluation Process Summary Documentation & Contacts

Summary Four main A-CDM Implementation Phases Phases 1,2 : Information & Analysis Phases (NMOC/CFMU provides info) Phase 3: (local) Implementation Phase (NMOC/CFMU provides support) Phase 4: DPI Operational Evaluation Phase (managed by NMOC/CFMU) Phase 3 ends with: CDM Completeness Assessment Determines if Airport is ready be integrated in the ATM Network Phase 4: DPI Operational Evaluation System integration testing & putting into Operations Takes 3-6 months

AGENDA Implementation Phases CDM Completeness Criteria DPI Operational Evaluation Process Summary Documentation & Contacts

Documentation (1/2) Airport CDM Manual Contains CDM Milestones approach and a general Description of DPI messages Ref: Edition 3.1, July 2010. http://www.euro-cdm.org/library/cdm_implementation_manual.pdf NM/CFMU Flight Progress Messages Document Contains DPI and FUM message syntax and semantics, general trigger events Ref: URB/USD/MSG_INTF, version 1.900, dated 01/02/2012 http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/cfmu/gallery/content/public/library/handbook_supplements/user_guides/docu_flight_progress_msg_latest.pdf DPI Implementation Guide Contains a details of DPI messages, including trigger events and processing by ETFMS Ref: URB/USD/DPI_Impl_Guide, version 1.600, dated 01/02/2012 http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/cfmu/gallery/content/public/userdocs/dpi/DPI_Impl_Guide.pdf

Documentation (2/2) FUM Implementation Guide Contains a details of FUM messages, including accuracy info and implementation guidelines Ref: URB/USD/FUM_Impl_Guide, version 1.200, dated 01/02/2012 http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/cfmu/gallery/content/public/userdocs/dpi/FUM_Impl_Guide.pdf DPI & FUM Implementation Road Map Contains description of steps for the DPI & FUM evaluation and Evaluation Criteria Ref: URB/USD/DPI_FUM_Impl_RM, version 1.400, dated 01/02/2012 http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/cfmu/gallery/content/public/userdocs/dpi/DPI_FUM_Impl_RM.pdf DPI ICD Contains the Airport specific DPI interface with the actual implementation of the DPI contents and trigger events http://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/cfmu/gallery/content/public/userdocs/dpi/DPI_ICD_template_v1450.pdf

Contacts Contacts: Hans Koolen, tel +32 2 729 9876 e-mail: johannes.koolen@eurocontrol.int Ioana Coliban, tel +32 2 729 9826 e-mail: ioana-angelica.coliban-porosnicu@eurocontrol.int

Thank you for your attention Hans Koolen Johannes.koolen@eurocontrol.int