Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Advertisements

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
From Research to Advocacy
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Evaluation What, How and Why Bother?.
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
Grantee Program Plan. Components of the Program Plan Goals  Objectives  Activities  Techniques & Tools  Outcomes/Change.
Monitoring and evaluation of carers’ services and projects Dr Andrea Wigfield - Associate Professor of Social Policy Centre for International Research.
Evaluating Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
PROGRAMS MONITORING AND SUPERVISION
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Abu Raihan, MD, MPH Director of Program, Asia IAPB 9th GA, Hyderabad, September 2012 Symposium 6: Challenges in Monitoring.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Improving Government Effectiveness Tracy Gallo – State of Vermont June Sweeney - Office of the State Auditor.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Developing Indicators
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Framework for Monitoring Learning & Evaluation
Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Creating a S.I.M.P.L.E. & Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Residence Life and Housing Dr. Mike Fulford Emory University Student Affairs Assessment Conference.
CHAPTERCHAPTER 8 Evaluation. Topics Covered in Chapter 8 The Purpose of Evaluation Objectives: A Prerequisite for Evaluation Current Status of Measurement.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Market Research & Product Management.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Public Relations Campaigns. _view0/part1/chapter1/multiple_choice_quiz.html
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SCS TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group #4 Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Arrive At Essential Understandings: Part 2- Asking Advancing Questions.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
The P Process Eight Key Questions 1. What is the communication problem? 2. What do we need to do? 3. What materials/interventions do we need to develop?
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
SUMMARY Macerata, 8 th April Andrea Gramillano, t33 srl.
Evaluation Nicola Bowtell. Some myths about evaluation 2Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer always involves extensive questionnaires means.
Office of Overseas Programming & Training Support (OPATS) Community Economic Development Advocacy Training Package Advocacy Implementation Plan.
Supporting community action on AIDS in developing countries ‘Evaluating HIV and AIDS-related advocacy’ Skills Building Session International.
Monitoring & Evaluation. What? Campaign monitoring is a step-by-step analysis of how the campaign is progressing against milestones previously defined.
Project monitoring and evaluation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
a New Focus for External Validity
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Today’s Training Objectives Understand different types of data and data collection techniques Be able to prepare a monitoring and evaluation framework for the advocacy campaign

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Data Collection Gathering, analyzing, and using appropriate quantitative and qualitative information to support each step of your public policy advocacy campaign.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Baseline Assessment A baseline assessment is the collection of data before an activity begins. The data are used to measure change after an activity has been implemented or during the course of implementation

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Monitoring and evaluation

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT What is M&E of a PPA work? Monitoring: is the process of routinely gathering information on all aspects of an advocacy campaign and using the information in network management and decision making. A sound monitoring and evaluation component helps an NGO track its successes and learning experiences, build credibility with donors, and motivate members to sustain momentum.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT What is M&E of a PPA work? Evaluation: Assesses the successes and failures of a PPA campaign, seeking to understand why what happened, happened. Establishes the link between advocacy activities and policy outcomes. Example: it establishes the causal relationship between a vote in Parliament and campaign activities e project at one point in time, including the successes and failures. It seeks to understand why what happened, happened If an NGO’s advocacy activities bring about a desired public policy change, the NGO will want to demonstrate a clear connection between its objectives and activities and the policy outcome.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Why monitor and evaluate your advocacy work? Evaluation involves a systematic, objective analysis of the network’s performance, efficiency, and impact in relation to its objectives. Its purpose is to: draw lessons from experience in order to improve the quality of an advocacy campaign; improve the design of future campaigns by avoiding risky situations; Identify and capitalize on opportunities, demonstrate the network’s merits to supporters, policymakers, donors, members, etc.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT What to Monitor? An essential ingredient of any advocacy strategy is an action plan, showing your inputs, outputs, outcomes and indicators: INPUTS: the resources you will be using - often simply in terms of staff and production costs OUTPUTS: the activities you will be undertaking. OUTCOMES. The impact you expect to achieve from each of your outputs INDICATORS. The evidence you will collect to show the outcome has been achieved.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT What to monitor? Monitor your target Record and observe changes in the rhetoric of your target audience. Keep a file of their statements over time. What are they saying about you and your campaign? Are they moving closer to your position, adapting to or adopting any of your language or philosophy? Monitoring your relationships Record the frequency and content of conversations with external sources and target audiences. Are you discussing new ideas? Are you becoming a confidante or a source of information or advice?

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT What to monitor? Monitoring the media Count column inches on your issue and the balance of pro and anti comment. Count the number of mentions for your organization. Analyze whether media is adopting your language. Monitoring your reputation Record the sources and numbers of inquiries that you receive as a result of your work. Are you getting to the people you wanted to get to? How and where have they heard of your work? How accurate are their pre-conceptions about you and your work? Monitoring public opinion Analyze the popular climate through telephone polling, or through commissioning surveys.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Monitoring Group Task Why would we monitor the activities in our advocacy plan? What should we monitor? Who will be responsible for collecting and analyzing monitoring information? When will monitoring take place? How will we gather the necessary information (e.g., data sources)?

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Evaluation Group Task Develop two evaluation questions for the following selected stages in the network’s advocacy strategy: Issue Goal/objective Target audience Message development Channels of Communication Data collection Monitoring and Evaluation

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Murakoze