HFT project Overview and Status October 14, 2010 F.Videbaek BNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, US CMS Cost & Schedule Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer DOE/NSF Review 8 May 2001.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – September 5-6, 2011 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on review results and plans for TPC – Time Projection.
FRA’s Earned Value Management System Overview for Self Assessment Surveillance March 07-09, 2011 Dean Hoffer Head, Office of Project Management Oversight.
4 4 By: A. Shukr, M. Alnouri. Many new project managers have trouble looking at the “big picture” and want to focus on too many details. Project managers.
Optimism R&D to be resumed! Three beam tests planned at Kek, –Hybrid target (KEKB Linac) –Liquid target (ATF Linac) –Boron-Nitride Window (KEKB) –(Starting.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
S/W Project Management
Annie Griffith Infrastructure Programme Manager July 2007 UK Link Technology Refresh.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck Deputy Director (Project Management)
Dec 12-14, 2005TBM Planning and Costing Meeting DCLL R&D Evaluations Summary Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Planning and Costing Meeting Dec 12-14,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities CD-2 Planning May 8, 2007.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
Lab-Wide Earned Value Management System Project Core Team Meeting October 01, 2008 Dean A. Hoffer/Elaine McCluskey.
NOvA Project Status April 3, 2007 John Cooper Ron Ray Nancy Grossman.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam Preparations for Critical Decision 2/3a Preparations for CD2 Preparations for CD3a DECam MOUs.
1 Space Communications Cross Support Architecture WG: Charter and Work Plan October, 2009 ESTEC, The Netherlands Takahiro Yamada, JAXA/ISAS.
Ahmad Al-Ghoul. Learning Objectives Explain what a project is,, list various attributes of projects. Describe project management, discuss Who uses Project.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
October 4-5, Status of ARRA funded AIPs Electron Lens Scope, Cost, and Schedule Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010 Electron Lens.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 16 September 2004 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting, 16 Sep 2004 AGS Project Office - status of funding, comments on RSVP
HFT face-2-face F.Videbaek Brookhaven National Lab.
LBNE Working Group Meeting December 20, :00– 5:00 PM Snake Pit.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
HFT project Overview and Status May 11, 2010 F.Videbaek BNL 5/11/20101.
7/26/2006 Wyatt Merritt 1 DECam CD1 Documentation DOE Critical Decision Process Documentation Requirements.
PSCIOC-PSSDC Workplan Coordination Strategy– Draft Coordination Committee Telecon
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
Annie Griffith & Chris Fears September 2007 UK Link Technology Refresh.
TOF Preliminary Design and Safety Review Project Management Controls R. L. Brown.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
Resources - Agenda Training - In Scope Thinking ahead Envisioning an outcome Communications Basic plans Risk identification Issue Identification CAP.
DUSEL Beamline Working Group Meeting March 09, :00 AM – Snake Pit (WH2NE) By Dean Hoffer - OPMO.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 6 Jan 2005 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting 6 Jan 2005 Useful Links: RSVP Project : C-AD.
Project X Working Group Meeting January 15, :00 PM Snake Pit.
Strykowsky 1Project Review November 2, 2005 NCSX Project Review November 2, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
Update on HEP SSC WLCG MB, 6 th July 2009 Jamie Shiers Grid Support Group IT Department, CERN.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
L. Greiner1IPHC-LBNL Phone Conference 07/10/2012 STAR IPHC-LBNL Phone Conference News and updated ladder testing.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Independent Project Review (IPR) June 8-9, 2004 NCSX Project Review June 8-9, 2004 Cost, Schedule, and Project Controls Ron Strykowsky.
Lab-Wide Earned Value Management System Project Oversight Committee Meeting September 11, 2008 Dean. Hoffer / Elaine McCluskey.
Lab-Wide Earned Value Management System Project Core Team Meeting September 10, 2008 Dean A. Hoffer/Elaine McCluskey.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
HFT project Overview and Status March 10, 2010
HFT Overview Flemming Videbæk BNL 3/14/12 F2F LBNL.
Project Management W. J. Foyt
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Transition Implementation Status Reporting
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Ctclink executive leadership committee May 31, 2018
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

HFT project Overview and Status October 14, 2010 F.Videbaek BNL

Meeting Structure Organization – Today: talks by sub-system Cost and Schedule Changes in scope since cd-1\ Identify uncertainties (risk, contingencies) Identify schedule drivers Walk through schedule at some detailed level (5) – i.e. major steps Manpower available for sub-system. Resource conflicts Plans/activities - reviews Technical Brief progress report – Afternoon Talks as needed – Discussion on base-lining and near term plan with solid deadlines. Monthly telecon 4pm/ tour to IR Continued discussion – Friday Coordination via e-room Continued discussion. 2HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Overview This talk Progress since Last meeting – CD-1 approval; homework – Funding status, cost status Schedule for CD-2/3 – Concerns In view of August/Sept progress Base-lining and sub-system WBS coordination – High-level considerations – Assessment of status Reporting – Monthly, quarterly, milestone status Requisites for CD 2/3 – documents 3HFT management Oct 14, 2010

CD-1 Approval follow-up items The CD-1 review was on August 31, 2010 Minutes from ESAAB review Jehanne Gillo also made the following suggestions to the Program Manager and FPD to be considered prior to CD-2: – Ensure that all recommendations resulting from prior reviews have been appropriately responded too and that there is general agreement by all parties. – Revise the Project Execution Plan (PEP) to be a more concise document—the preliminary PEP is still too detailed. The ESAAB Equivalent Board unanimously recommended approval of CD-1, and Jehanne Gillo signed the decision documentation. 4HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Funding Status Have k$2,400 at BNL SOW for LBL work through Feb has been signed; funds transferred (k$940) SOW for MIT being developed. BNL cost fairly small for that period, up to base-lining. Keep contingency and management reserve at BNL September Monthly expenditure 5HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Near Term HFT Schedule Our baseline plan from July was based on – Mid October (now) had first schedule in hand and iterated once combined – Early Dec – Vigdor/BNL review – Early Feb or Mid March DOE CD2/3 review – At earliest CD2/3 approval end March As of today we are not far enough to schedule the Nov meeting. Progress today and in coming two weeks will determine if this is feasible. My estimate we are 2-3 weeks behind where we wanted to be 6HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Base-lining and sub-system coordination High-level considerations – I: Have PXL+SSD | IST in place for run-14 i.e simmer 2013 – II: Optimize STAR installation got summer 2011 ie. run- 13 with WCS(FGT), proto OSC and ESC – III: Summer 2012 may be far enough to have new BeamPipe and MSC structure. A run-12 PXK eng run may be possible, but is not in the baseline plan – Minimize STAR openings – There are clearly other intermediate desirable goals but the high-level goals are important. 7HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Assessments of Status (Tuesday) PXL – Electric: schedule and cost in WBS. Tasks cost rolled up from cost book – Mechanical: cost book cost, manpower done; schedule from before, but not filled, durations? IST – Schedule (CD-1) and cost in WBS; Contingency analysis performed. Not adjusted to current time frame SSD – Task list and dependencies in WBS. No cost and contingency analysis performed. Integration – Status as PXL, Mechanical; Needs handover to Dana for installation scheduling. Management – Not done, but relatively simple. Allocating project people, and meeting/review schedules No dependencies across sub-systems. No sure cost books will come out in uniform way. Needs reporting tools to pull this of WBS. BOE –costbooks, other documentation. 8HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Reporting Monthly Reports – At end of month send reminder to tc-list; expect to receive ahead of 2 Thursday (telecon) 5 business days; Report to finalize around the 20’th of each month. – After this months report we have gotten into a good mode for these. A few corrective suggestions Please supply in word When referring to people give full name. Identify acronyms first time. Will build up a standard glossary at end. Monthly report goes to Lloyd Nellson BHSO, and with copy to Helmut Marsiske. The content is essentially reported at monthly telecon. 9HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Quarterly report High level report for Federal Project Director (FPD) to DOE HQ. Also associated with telecon. Usually needs to be complete on ~ 20 on the month following the end of quarter. Kerry have a draft based on model from EBIS. See next two slides on likely content. Needs financial input/summary; descriptive part will be based on previous 3 months report. 10HFT management Oct 14, 2010

11HFT management Oct 14, 2010

12HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Documents for CD-2/3 – Performance baseline (WBS,COSTbooks, BOE) – Final Design (TDR + supporting documents) – Updated risk assessment registry – Updated PEP – Updated Hazard Analysis – NEPA document (DONE) – Updated Q&A program Need to incorporate the completion of these into our near term plans. 13HFT management Oct 14, 2010

Conclusions Many open ended issues; goal for this meeting to set specific near term goals so we can meet a good cd2/3 schedule and the ultimate run- 14 installation. The need for scheduling vs. design and technical progress has to be kept in mind. 14HFT management Oct 14, 2010